135
Thursday, March 31, 2016 - 01:53 PM UTC
In the announcement of Russian V-84 Tank Engine, MENG claimed the T-72/T-90 engine is designed for both TS-014 and TS-028. Well, if their TS-014 model was T-90, then the mysterious TS-028 should be... you guessed it: T-72.
TS-028 - Russian Main Battle Tank T-72B3

Not much additional info at the moment, just couple of images shared from Meng's FB page... Enjoy!
Click Star to Rate
7 readers have rated this story.
Get a daily email with links to all our latest news, reviews, and features.

Comments

ok.... but why T-72B3? Not T-72B+k5 obr 1989?
APR 01, 2016 - 11:11 AM
The Meng offering seems to be similar to the older T-72 variant of trumpeter (http://www.1999.co.jp/eng/image/10244450z18/70/18). While the new Trumpeter offering T-72B3M is slightly different especially the turret with the armor plates which should be 5 in each side for both the B3M and B4 variant.
APR 01, 2016 - 12:06 PM
How wonderfully confusing, if you're not a dyed-in-the-wool Russo-Soviet fan! Sooooo, if you're really a dedicated R-S fan, what's the solution..? Buy BOTH kits..? Buying both kits may not be a financially-feasible solution for some of us. I read in the TRUMPETER T-72B3M announcement on this site that the -B3 is really pretty much the same vehicle as the -B4..? I'm not a big R-S fan personally, so please excuse my ignorance; doesn't one kit cancel out the other? It seems to me that one would just go by preference for one manufacturer over the other, in this case. Maybe one of you guys could steer me in the right direction on this one...
APR 01, 2016 - 07:17 PM
upgraded fire control system, among other things. Sean
APR 01, 2016 - 07:40 PM
Simple trading basics, Mike : there is no way to make everybody happy... It's not that hard to work with either Meng's or Trump's plastics, it's just a matter of personal taste. But similar arguing arises between IPhone lovers and SmartPhones ones, Ford and Chevy, and so on. And in the end nobody is wrong, is just the same matter of each one's taste or preferences. For me, it is great to have so many new releases, I cannot complain if this year we end being able to choice between 8+ Abrams kits or a similar number of T-72's, f.e., even if I'm still waiting for a T-72A and M1(could not help not mentioning it) And we modelers have to complain about something, always, don't we?
APR 01, 2016 - 08:01 PM
Simple trading basics, Mike : there is no way to make everybody happy... It's not that hard to work with either Meng's or Trump's plastics, it's just a matter of personal taste. But similar arguing arises between IPhone lovers and SmartPhones ones, Ford and Chevy, and so on. And in the end nobody is wrong, is just the same matter of each one's taste or preferences. For me, it is great to have so many new releases, I cannot complain if this year we end being able to choice between 8+ Abrams kits or a similar number of T-72's, f.e., even if I'm still waiting for a T-72A and M1(could not help not mentioning it) And we modelers have to complain about something, always, don't we? [/quote] Re: The 8+ Abrams kits- Too bad most of them are of the same subject: the M1A2 SEP w/TUSK II. I wish the manufacturers would do some USMC M1A1 Heavy Common, M1A1HA (Heavy Armor), and the M1ABV (Armored Breaching Vehicle). Yes, DEF MODELS does a multi-media M1ABV Conversion kit, but this conversion retails at an average price of $150.00, + Shipping... We could also use new kits of the earlier M1s, equipped with the 105mm Gun, such as the M1-IP, M1, and M1A... I agree that we could use an all-new, plain old T-72A as well... PS- An all-new PLASTIC Ukrainian T84 "OPLOT". I don't think that the X-ACT T-84 "OPLOT" is ever going to happen...
APR 01, 2016 - 08:10 PM
I think those other variants will come. Most manufacturers now seem to maximise their investment by putting out multiple variants of a subject. It's probably just coincidence we get runs of the same version. Meng have already shown CADs for features of earlier Abrams versions, and I notice their kit's lower hull part has features molded on for earlier Abrams which get either cut off or covered up for the TUSK. Rye's Abrams has also has some early parts not used for the TUSK versions, as well as the beginnings of an interior. Trumpeter have hinted a couple of times they're working on earlier T-72s, and have announced a T-80U family which hopefully will include a T-84. So no guarantees, but the signs are good...
APR 01, 2016 - 08:46 PM
I think those other variants will come. Most manufacturers now seem to maximise their investment by putting out multiple variants of a subject. It's probably just coincidence we get runs of the same version. Meng have already shown CADs for features of earlier Abrams versions, and I notice their kit's lower hull part has features molded on for earlier Abrams which get either cut off or covered up for the TUSK. Rye's Abrams has also has some early parts not used for the TUSK versions, as well as the beginnings of an interior. Trumpeter have hinted a couple of times they're working on earlier T-72s, and have announced a T-80U family which hopefully will include a T-84. So no guarantees, but the signs are good...[/quote] Thanks, Ed! So there IS some hope, after all!
APR 01, 2016 - 09:32 PM
Hi, See preview of the meng 7-72b3 kit. LINK Kenneth
JUN 27, 2016 - 04:11 PM
THIS STORY HAS BEEN READ 11,383 TIMES.
ADVERTISEMENT

Photos
Click image to enlarge
  • move
Meng Model ReviewsMORE
Panther Zimmerit Decals In-Box Review
by Andras
Leopard 2A7+ In-Box Review
by Darren Baker
M4A3E2 Jumbo In-Box Review
by Darren Baker
Bergepanther Ausf. A In-Box Review
by Mark
JagdPanther In-Box Review
by Sebastian Schoof
Panther Ausf. D In-Box Review
by Mark
Merkava Mk.4m In-Box Review
by Benjamin M. Kahn
King Tiger Henschel Turret In-Box Review
by Talal Mashtoub
FT-17 crew and orderly Built Review
by Bob Davis
Russian Terminator In-Box Review
by Sebastian Schoof
Leopard 2A7 Built Review
by Kevin Brant
T-72B3 Built Review
by Ian Barraclough
Russian MBT T-72B3 In-Box Review
by Ian Barraclough | of 1 ratings, 0% found this helpful
M1A2 Tusk 1/Tusk 2 Built Review Video Review included
by Andrew Leeth | of 2 ratings, 50% found this helpful
Flakpanzer Gepard In-Box Review
by Michael Shackleton | of 1 ratings, 0% found this helpful

ADVERTISEMENT