AFV CLUB [ MORE REVIEWS ] [ WEBSITE ] [ NEW STORIES ]

In-Box Review
135
M1130 Stryker CV/TACP
M1130 Stryker Command Vehicle/CV TACP
  • AF35130_M1130_STRYKER_CV_TACP

by: Robert Burik [ BURIK ]

AFV Club has followed up their ICV offering with this very nice M1130 command version. The CV is not as numerous as the other variants, but its choice by AFV Club makes sense since it is an easy conversion. The CV's hull is just about the same, except for another power entry hatch on the right side which is really a signal entry panel for antennas and whatnot. The roof has the many additional antennas that make the CV (Command Vehicle) and CV TACV (Command Vehicle Tactical Air Control Party). All of this is covered with the new N Sprue. Not to rest just there, AFV Club decided to include a resin Blue Force Tracker in the the intitial production kits.

THE KIT

Since I covered the AFV Club ICV kit in my earlier review, I will not waste too much space here going over the same ground again, other than to note that the basic kit is excellent in fit and detail. The detail is crisp, and a joy to work with. The only drawback both in the ICV kit and this follow-up kit is the lack of non-slip coating on the upper surfaces. There are a number of different ways to represent this, including Cast-A-Coat, and Rust All spray, so all hope is not lost. Yes, we still need to be modelers and not just assemblers. But, many will not see the need to even add this detail since it is not so obvious to many. The excellently represented tires are vinyl, and the jury is still out on this choice of material. Some modelers have a difficult time keeping paint from chipping off vinyl tires, and others complain vinyl deteriorates over time.

The instructions are very busy and they should be studied before diving in. For those who built the ICV note that in step 7 the first new ground is covered. AFV Club listened to us and provided the correct perforated strut guards in PE. The wheel step rings are not in PE, but it would not be difficult to thin these by placing them over top of a cone shaped Dremel Took bur and spin it over some sandpaper. Step 11 has some CV specific additions as well, and then the fun really starts on step 16. For those who have the excellent WWP book by Ralph Zwilling there is a nice chapter on the CV to help double check the different details.

Before deciding on step 34 (yes 34 steps!) decide if you want to use the included Duke anti-IED system, which is part N32. I do not see this covered in the instructions, but the Duke is there, and it is mounted on the antenna mounting bracket that goes over the winch cover. If the Duke is mounted I do not believe the other antennas mentioned in the instructions would go there as a result. Also, for those who mount the Duke, most of the time crews add wires from top to bottom (check references) to help guide low hanging wires up and over the Duke.

The large new PE set als includes many footman loops left out of the original ICV kit. The kit already has some plastic ones represented on the engine cover, but now we can place them where we want, including the rear roof (to tie down the water and fuel cans), and hull sides for the many straps that are seen there. The rear door has lots of PE to help with some detail not covered in the ICV (but both are correct - the version represented here is much more common). Oddly, the jerrycan racks do not get the PE option and could benefit with such an update, but still one can thin the plastic parts before gluing them together, thus getting the correct scale effect.

All the new fancy antennas/antenna bases appear accurate. Good luck attaching all those thin antennas to their mounts!

DECALS

Only three vehicle marking options are provided, and all are of the same Stryker Brigade - 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment - from Germany. As I write this 2nd Cav (really just like any other Stryker Bde and thus a cav unit in name only) is deployed to Iraq. For those who have the WWP book all of the Strykers there are from this Stryker Brigade, so some of the cool markings can seen there. One excellent addition to this decal sheet not provided in the ICV kit is the inclusion of fire warning decals for the fuel cans. Still, they are on the thick side and will require some extra work to try and make them disappear once placed.

CONCLUSIONS

Highs: AFV Club stepped-upped and fixed some fo the shortcomings of the ICV kit. Now we get footman loops, perforated strut guards, and even some extras that can be used on other variants like the Blue Force Tracker and Duke. The RWS remains a super little kit in of itself. Note it still can be detailed with some prominent cables.

Lows: The kit is still missing the non-slip surface, but this would be difficult to fix without all new tooling of the hull part. Also, there is no interior for this kit or any other Stryker kit; not even any basic items to use as a start. Hopefully, the aftermarket companies will come to our rescue. I think most modelers would want to leave the ramp down and top hatches open. Finally, some dimensions are off as it relates to the hull, but this is not evident without measuring. It most definitely looks like a Stryker by using the Mk I eyeball.

I highly recommend this kit. The details are astonishing. In my view to make the kit perfect it would need non-slip coating and measure out perfectly. The other shortcomings are subjective.

PERSONAL NOTE

No slat armor is provided in either kit - or any other kit for that matter. To depict the vehicle in Iraq one needs to have slat mounted, so the remaining choice would be to depict the vehicle at home station or on a training exercise at say, the National Training Center at Ft Irwin or the Joint Readiness Training Center at Ft Polk. These options would require the addition of MILES gear. Still, vehicles are seen at home station without all the MILES mounted, but they normally at least have the MILES Velcro tape on the hull.

The reference photos attached here do not have Velcro tape since this vehicle was just off the truck from the General Dynamics plant. It had not been assigned to a unit yet.
SUMMARY
Highs: AFV Club stepped-upped and fixed some fo the shortcomings of the ICV kit. Now we get footman loops, perforated strut guards, and even some extras that can be used on other variants like the Blue Force Tracker and Duke.
Lows: The kit is still missing the non-slip surface, but this would be difficult to fix without all new tooling of the hull part. Also, there is no interior for this kit or any other Stryker kit; not even any basic items to use as a start.
Verdict: I highly recommend this kit. The details are astonishing. In my view to make the kit perfect it would need non-slip coating and measure out perfectly. The other shortcomings are subjective.
Percentage Rating
95%
  Scale: 1:35
  Mfg. ID: AF35130
  PUBLISHED: Oct 25, 2007
  NATIONALITY: United States
NETWORK-WIDE AVERAGE RATINGS
  THIS REVIEWER: 90.00%
  MAKER/PUBLISHER: 89.68%

Our Thanks to AFV Club!
This item was provided by them for the purpose of having it reviewed on this KitMaker Network site. If you would like your kit, book, or product reviewed, please contact us.

View Vendor Homepage  |  More Reviews  

About Robert Burik (Burik)
FROM: NEW JERSEY, UNITED STATES

We recently moved to New Jersey from Oregon. Being from Pittsburgh, we are very happy to be back on the east coast, although I will miss the Northwest - it is quite beautiful. I have been modeling since my teens, and have been lucky enough to have written a couple of books and a handful of artic...

Copyright ©2021 text by Robert Burik [ BURIK ]. All rights reserved.



Comments

Has anyone compaired the AFV and Trumpeter Stryker kits with each other? I just got both kits and noticed a lot of differences between the two. The Trumpeter kit is wider, the hatches are diferent sizes, wheels and tires are not even close to being the same size. Any ideas why this is?
OCT 25, 2007 - 05:04 AM
Jerry Perth Military Modeling did a comparison between the two... Stryker And a review index... Stryker review index Also Robert Burik did a review of the AFV 1126 Stryker, also through out the fourm boards there are many questions and answers on the two subjects.
OCT 25, 2007 - 05:55 AM
Thanks for the review Rob Is this kit a better buy thans the standard version, as you have more options with it do you think? cheers keith
OCT 25, 2007 - 05:57 AM
Without being able to check at the moment I am pretty sure all the parts from the ICV are there plus those needed for the CV. So, the CV is the better value and those that wish can really make an ICV out of it instead. And you get that extra stuff that can be used on either version - Duke, strut guards, footman loops... Even though the hull for the CV has that hatch opening on the right side the ICV right side piece will cover it over. Bob
OCT 25, 2007 - 01:51 PM
Mine arrived today Like Bob said you get the parts to do the ICV along with the kits parts. One will be a ICV while the other a CV. I was going to buy the AFV M1126 kit but decided on this kit for the extra PE. There is a sticker on the box top..." Special Parts first edition only " will these parts no longer be with the first run of kits...any ideas Bob. Joe
OCT 25, 2007 - 03:23 PM
Joe, I have no connections w/ AFV Club so I can only suppose their words are true - future CV kits will not have the resin BFT item. I also suppose to do an ICV out of the CV kit you MIGHT need a different decal sheet other than which comes with the CV kit. Two of the three options are HQ units. Would an ICV be in a HQ unit? Maybe, but I am not sure. The third option actually has blacked out bumper codes, so I suppose an ICV can have these bumper codes too.
OCT 25, 2007 - 03:44 PM
Hi the top deck of the CV is not the same as the ICV ,Is decal (40) for the HFCoupler???.The extra decal (22) is for the lower Left front of the vehicle
OCT 27, 2007 - 09:40 AM
True...not all that hard to remove and fill a few antenna base's and the top area will be filled up with gear. The reason I got an extra CV kit was that it came with the extra PE. Bob...yeah I'll have to make up my own markings for one of the units. Joe
OCT 27, 2007 - 11:42 AM
Yes. If one were not going to fill that portion of the roof with gear as Joe plans on doing, you could not do an ICV. YOu can see the differences in the photos of the roofs in the two different reviews and determine for yourself if it is worth the effort to remove/fill the CV differences to make an ICV. Bob
OCT 27, 2007 - 01:15 PM
   
ADVERTISEMENT


Photos
Click image to enlarge
  • Stryker-CV-018
  • Stryker-CV-020
  • Stryker-CV-011
  • Stryker-CV-013
  • Stryker-CV-007
  • Stryker-CV-002
  • Stryker-CV-006
  • Stryker-CV-009
  • Stryker-CV-005
  • Stryker-CV-004
  • Stryker-CV-010
  • Stryker-CV-008
  • Stryker-CV-014
  • Stryker-CV-017
  • Stryker_ICV_Ft_Lewis_07_020
  • Stryker_ICV_Ft_Lewis_07_001
  • Stryker_ICV_Ft_Lewis_07_015
  • Stryker_ICV_Ft_Lewis_07_068
ADVERTISEMENT