Some interesting (not to mention confusing!!) pictures there. Everyone has made some good points about the whys and why nots of T-64 deployment by the Russians. They could be Ukranian tanks on the way out of Crimea of course. But would the Russians really be willing to help send tanks back to the Ukraine with the prospect they could be used against them at some point, hopefully not obviously, but still it has to be a consideration. Why would they help send them back if there was even a slight possibility they could be used against them?
As for Andre's theory about a Marine/Naval Infantry unit I have to say I personally lean towards that- as you also pointed out Andre there is an anchor like symbol in the Luna light. The last known users of the T-64 in the Russian military I read about were the Naval Infantry- and there likely would be some Marines in Crimea even before this crisis. Those tanks could very well be Russian Naval Infantry.
I personally wouldn't rule out any particular scenario- they could very well be Ukranian or some other branch of the Russian military. Like I said, confusing and interesting.
Яusso-Soviэt Forum
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Jacques Duquette
Vehicles in Crimea (Russian/Ukrainian army)
Posted: Friday, March 28, 2014 - 11:25 PM UTC
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Friday, March 28, 2014 - 11:42 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextQuoted Text
I hope this whole conflict doesn't turn into any major military action
We all hope for that !
SLAVA YKPAIHA!!
SLAVA YKPAIHA, INDEED!!! Being of Ukrainian descent, I've got a good mind to get rid of any and all of my SOVIET & RUSSIAN 1/35 and 1/48 stuff. Why can't the Russians leave us alone..?
todorovicandreas
Austria
Joined: May 01, 2007
KitMaker: 608 posts
Armorama: 593 posts
Joined: May 01, 2007
KitMaker: 608 posts
Armorama: 593 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2014 - 12:45 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextQuoted TextQuoted Text
I hope this whole conflict doesn't turn into any major military action
We all hope for that !
SLAVA YKPAIHA!!
SLAVA YKPAIHA, INDEED!!! Being of Ukrainian descent, I've got a good mind to get rid of any and all of my SOVIET & RUSSIAN 1/35 and 1/48 stuff. Why can't the Russians leave us alone..?
Then send all your stuff to me Dennis, I would give them a good home. i know I broke that rule once myself, but no one here wants to start political debates. There are at least two stories to each conflict. If you want to debate with me thats fine, write me a PM. If not, thats even finer.
André, good point about the T-64's
All the best,
Andreas
RECON22
Queensland, Australia
Joined: February 10, 2012
KitMaker: 665 posts
Armorama: 652 posts
Joined: February 10, 2012
KitMaker: 665 posts
Armorama: 652 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2014 - 01:23 AM UTC
Thanks Andreas.....greatly appreciated.
Jason.
Jason.
hugohuertas
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Joined: January 26, 2007
KitMaker: 1,024 posts
Armorama: 1,013 posts
Joined: January 26, 2007
KitMaker: 1,024 posts
Armorama: 1,013 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2014 - 03:28 AM UTC
About those T-64's pics, until new evidence/references arise, we might consider the caption of one of the pictures at militaryphotos site -even when once in a while the captions there are not the most accurate- :
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?236632-This-Week-s-Photos-Sunday-March-23rd-Saturday-March-29th-2014/page4
Caption clearly says: "A Russian soldier (L) guides a Ukrainian tank, which is to be loaded onto a train, in northern Crimea March 27, 2014. (photo by Yannis Behrakis)"
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?236632-This-Week-s-Photos-Sunday-March-23rd-Saturday-March-29th-2014/page4
Caption clearly says: "A Russian soldier (L) guides a Ukrainian tank, which is to be loaded onto a train, in northern Crimea March 27, 2014. (photo by Yannis Behrakis)"
Blucop
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: January 03, 2005
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 262 posts
Joined: January 03, 2005
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 262 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2014 - 05:48 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi Everybody;
Another Option you could possibly consider, that they are Ukraine T-64 that are being incorporated into the Crimean Russian Federation. Or Liberated if you can Believe That.
CHEERS; MIKE.
This
ruzzaa
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 17, 2007
KitMaker: 197 posts
Armorama: 189 posts
Joined: October 17, 2007
KitMaker: 197 posts
Armorama: 189 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2014 - 11:03 PM UTC
The tanks are Ukrainian tanks,Russia is returning them back the
Ukraine.
Russia is only keeping some Ukrainian Navy ships
Net Photo
Ukraine.
Russia is only keeping some Ukrainian Navy ships
Net Photo
PantherF
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 01:29 AM UTC
I have truly enjoyed these images of this newly developed conflict!
Does anyone have the 2008 Georgian thread? I lost all that when I switched out PC's.
Jeff
Does anyone have the 2008 Georgian thread? I lost all that when I switched out PC's.
Jeff
billwinkes
Alabama, United States
Joined: March 20, 2009
KitMaker: 33 posts
Armorama: 28 posts
Joined: March 20, 2009
KitMaker: 33 posts
Armorama: 28 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 06:37 AM UTC
Sven
Thanks so much for the photos. They may inspire many a BTR and BMP build.
Also, makes me anticipate Trumpeter's forthcoming T--64BV as a basis for a Ukranian tank.
Bill Winkes
Thanks so much for the photos. They may inspire many a BTR and BMP build.
Also, makes me anticipate Trumpeter's forthcoming T--64BV as a basis for a Ukranian tank.
Bill Winkes
jvazquez
New Jersey, United States
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 07:50 AM UTC
These pics have definitley inspired me in my GAZ Tiger build!
Okpik031
Quebec, Canada
Joined: February 12, 2013
KitMaker: 72 posts
Armorama: 62 posts
Joined: February 12, 2013
KitMaker: 72 posts
Armorama: 62 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 08:00 AM UTC
The cows are not looking very disturbed are they However it does give ideas for displays
Okpik031
Quebec, Canada
Joined: February 12, 2013
KitMaker: 72 posts
Armorama: 62 posts
Joined: February 12, 2013
KitMaker: 72 posts
Armorama: 62 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 08:16 AM UTC
Thats pretty nice of them does Russia not have enough ships of their own. Or are the ones they want more advanced and newer than their Own ships. In some way I do understand their fear of losing their big Black Sea base but they could have come up with a better deal than a out right take over but be sure they are betting on a bunch of fist waving and little else from the West? Sorry if its a little off topic I just donot understand taking ships while returning Armour!
jvazquez
New Jersey, United States
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 08:45 AM UTC
When I hit the lotto jackpot I'm definitely importing a Tiger here to the states!
Modelfreak04
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 08:49 AM UTC
After looking at the pictures in the link posted in militar net (they have beter definition), one thing became obvious to me: the tanks being transported by train and the ones loaded on buses are from different units and seem to have nothing to do with each other.
The tanks loaded on buses (being driven by Russian soldiers) have a 3 tone camuflage (including blue) and the luna projector shows a unit symbol with na anchor(that symbol is probably the key to determine to whom the tanks belong).
The tanks loaded on the train are monocolor and have a number in the luna projector.
I keep thinking that the tanks in three colour camuflage are Russian (already explained why and I'm not going to reapeat the arguments again)and I doubt that the Russian's would allow the Ukrainians to extricate their militar assets from the Krimea, specially at a time the tension is going high between the two countries.
Further more, the Russians didn't just took a few vessels from the Ukranians, they took all vessels they could take (officially through the self-defense forces) including Ukrania's only submarime (as far as I know it was the only one).
I will still add a few more comments that I think are relevant to the discution.
On what concerns the captions on the site, probably anyone that had to research some piece of news of international repercussion found out that the diferente news agencies tend to repeat the same news with the same imprecisions.
That doesn't happen by accident, contrary to popular believe most news agencies don't have the means to have reporters on the spot (and when they have, often reporters know nothing about what they are reporteing: that's why they weren't able to ascertain that the uniformed men were Russian Federation troops and not a local militia) and some news are just repeated by everyone else after being circulated by just one source of information.
Then Russia is going to huge efforts to disguize its intervention in the Krimea, even sending troops without unit badges and with faces covered to have enough deniability to say that it was just the work os a self defense krimean militia.
So, I think it is quite plausible that the captions to the pictures have little to do with the reallity they are supposed to discribe, specially if they show Russian troops entering Krimea.
Then I think that some of us are just resisting the idea of the tanks being Russian because of some assumptions, not sound knowledge of real confirmed info/intel, but just assumptions: the assumption that Russians already scrapped their T-64; the assumption that Russian's don't use Ukrainian material; the assumption that there is some sort of nationalistic complex that was responsible for Russian to just start using "Russian".
We should keep a open mind about this.
For the moment I stick to the hypotesis (just an hypotesis; I don't hold a definitive truth) that those tanks belong to the Russian black berets and that they have been in assigned with them for long.
If anyone has some peace of relevant information to share (namely the identification of the badge on the luna projectors), please do.
Best regards,
The tanks loaded on buses (being driven by Russian soldiers) have a 3 tone camuflage (including blue) and the luna projector shows a unit symbol with na anchor(that symbol is probably the key to determine to whom the tanks belong).
The tanks loaded on the train are monocolor and have a number in the luna projector.
I keep thinking that the tanks in three colour camuflage are Russian (already explained why and I'm not going to reapeat the arguments again)and I doubt that the Russian's would allow the Ukrainians to extricate their militar assets from the Krimea, specially at a time the tension is going high between the two countries.
Further more, the Russians didn't just took a few vessels from the Ukranians, they took all vessels they could take (officially through the self-defense forces) including Ukrania's only submarime (as far as I know it was the only one).
I will still add a few more comments that I think are relevant to the discution.
On what concerns the captions on the site, probably anyone that had to research some piece of news of international repercussion found out that the diferente news agencies tend to repeat the same news with the same imprecisions.
That doesn't happen by accident, contrary to popular believe most news agencies don't have the means to have reporters on the spot (and when they have, often reporters know nothing about what they are reporteing: that's why they weren't able to ascertain that the uniformed men were Russian Federation troops and not a local militia) and some news are just repeated by everyone else after being circulated by just one source of information.
Then Russia is going to huge efforts to disguize its intervention in the Krimea, even sending troops without unit badges and with faces covered to have enough deniability to say that it was just the work os a self defense krimean militia.
So, I think it is quite plausible that the captions to the pictures have little to do with the reallity they are supposed to discribe, specially if they show Russian troops entering Krimea.
Then I think that some of us are just resisting the idea of the tanks being Russian because of some assumptions, not sound knowledge of real confirmed info/intel, but just assumptions: the assumption that Russians already scrapped their T-64; the assumption that Russian's don't use Ukrainian material; the assumption that there is some sort of nationalistic complex that was responsible for Russian to just start using "Russian".
We should keep a open mind about this.
For the moment I stick to the hypotesis (just an hypotesis; I don't hold a definitive truth) that those tanks belong to the Russian black berets and that they have been in assigned with them for long.
If anyone has some peace of relevant information to share (namely the identification of the badge on the luna projectors), please do.
Best regards,
ruzzaa
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 17, 2007
KitMaker: 197 posts
Armorama: 189 posts
Joined: October 17, 2007
KitMaker: 197 posts
Armorama: 189 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 09:20 PM UTC
ukrainian naval infantry
Net Photo
Net Photo
Reiter960
California, United States
Joined: June 24, 2007
KitMaker: 503 posts
Armorama: 500 posts
Joined: June 24, 2007
KitMaker: 503 posts
Armorama: 500 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2014 - 10:20 PM UTC
Quoted Text
André thanks for the Info. But then I suppose those are units along the boarder with ukraine but on the russian side and not on crimea, right? Very interesting to see russians using the T-64!
I second that, If anyone has more Info about the Units and locations, please Let us know.
Best regards,
Andreas
They aren't using those. Modern day Russian tankies have almost allergic reaction to Kharkov and Leningrad tank designs. These are T-64BVs from 64th Separate Armor Battalion whose entire staff pledged allegiance to separatist Crimean and then Russian regime in early March. If media is to be trusted, they are in really bad shape, many have failed rangefinders and other vital components. These tanks are being returned to Ukraine proper, the unit is apparently getting re-equipped with T-72BA3s after they finish retraining. Info from militaryphotos.net.
Quoted Text
The tanks are Ukrainian tanks,Russia is returning them back the
Ukraine.
Russia is only keeping some Ukrainian Navy ships
Net Photo
The decision to return most of the boats has been made. They will give back that old Foxtrot sub and few minesweepers. Raptucha class landing vessels will be sent to St.Petersburg for refits and absorbed by Black Sea Fleet.
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2014 - 04:07 AM UTC
Thank you George.
It is hard to get the idea across how much animosity that is between Russia and Ukraine about tanks. Russia's decision for the T-90 is partly political with Ukraine, and T-62/T-72's are cheap/easy to use in anything but the most modern military encounter.
Ukrainian navy was never in very good shape, they had no money to run it properly, so whatever the Russians got, it will not be in great shape.
T-64's back to Ukraine? Why not? Russians see them as inferior junk (true or not) and will be quite happy to "deposit" them in Ukraines new doorstep, and it is a slap in Kharkov's face as well.
It is hard to get the idea across how much animosity that is between Russia and Ukraine about tanks. Russia's decision for the T-90 is partly political with Ukraine, and T-62/T-72's are cheap/easy to use in anything but the most modern military encounter.
Ukrainian navy was never in very good shape, they had no money to run it properly, so whatever the Russians got, it will not be in great shape.
T-64's back to Ukraine? Why not? Russians see them as inferior junk (true or not) and will be quite happy to "deposit" them in Ukraines new doorstep, and it is a slap in Kharkov's face as well.
Modelfreak04
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2014 - 07:03 AM UTC
Hello!
Geof, could you please provide more info about that shield?
I'm not saying that that isn't the symbol of the Ukrainian marines, but the symbol I know is completely different (an anchor with a sword over it, not a Griffon).
I know there is a site that has all symbols of Russian, Ukrainian and Bielorussian militar units (I downloaded a file with them ages ago, but lost it when I changed computer). Anyone knows this site? I can't find it now.
The questions raised here made me check the Ukrainian naval ORBAT -- probably that would be the most inteligente thing to do in the first place -- after doing it all I can say is that I found no tanks in their companies.
Maybe the data I accessed is not correct, but couldn't find any tanks assigned to them.
Best regards,
Geof, could you please provide more info about that shield?
I'm not saying that that isn't the symbol of the Ukrainian marines, but the symbol I know is completely different (an anchor with a sword over it, not a Griffon).
I know there is a site that has all symbols of Russian, Ukrainian and Bielorussian militar units (I downloaded a file with them ages ago, but lost it when I changed computer). Anyone knows this site? I can't find it now.
The questions raised here made me check the Ukrainian naval ORBAT -- probably that would be the most inteligente thing to do in the first place -- after doing it all I can say is that I found no tanks in their companies.
Maybe the data I accessed is not correct, but couldn't find any tanks assigned to them.
Best regards,
jvazquez
New Jersey, United States
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2014 - 07:29 AM UTC
George and Jaques, great information! Thank you
Modelfreak04
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2014 - 07:31 AM UTC
On what concerns allergic reactions of Russians towards Ukrainian tank designs truth is that I never saw that.
As far as I know, the primary reason that led to Russia taking the T-80's from active service (they weren't sold out, nor scrapped) had to do with the motorization of these tanks (the turbine motors generate a high fuel comsumption, are difficult to mantain, need a lot of mantainance and have a very low service life) and the fact that its licence of production belongs to Kharkov.
The Ukrainians are still producing the T-80 as the Oplot and, in fact, they just started delievers to Thailand.
From what I read and hear the tank is quite good.
As for the T-64 I'm not sure that Russians scrapped all their tanks or that those tanks are all in a preety bad shape.
The tanks in the photos are tanks that not only are well mantained (and believe me I saw my share of poorly mantained millitary hardware) but have been updated.
And I wouldn't be so sure that the Russian marines (I will check their ORBAT as soon as possible) won't use them.
In fact, the T-64 is a tank that could still find its use with a marine unit: it's smaller and lighter than a T-72, it has fording capabilities, it has enough firepower to give support to infantry ... and probably it is available in huge numbers and if you use it, you will not have to take better more reliable tanks from units that need them more.
Honestely, til now I haven't seen a piece of evidence that shows that those tanks aren't deploying with Russian troops.
It doesn't seem believable that Russia, who just augmented its millitary presence in the fronteer of the Ukrain and is trying to impose the federalization of that country would allow the Ukrainians to take their tanks to the mainland and even less that they would do the favor of transporting them.
Also don't think that the Russian troops photographed in the field near the tank, where just looking for "griby" and "klubniki" and just by accident, found a modernized T-64.
Lets keep bringing the info we can find.
All the best,
As far as I know, the primary reason that led to Russia taking the T-80's from active service (they weren't sold out, nor scrapped) had to do with the motorization of these tanks (the turbine motors generate a high fuel comsumption, are difficult to mantain, need a lot of mantainance and have a very low service life) and the fact that its licence of production belongs to Kharkov.
The Ukrainians are still producing the T-80 as the Oplot and, in fact, they just started delievers to Thailand.
From what I read and hear the tank is quite good.
As for the T-64 I'm not sure that Russians scrapped all their tanks or that those tanks are all in a preety bad shape.
The tanks in the photos are tanks that not only are well mantained (and believe me I saw my share of poorly mantained millitary hardware) but have been updated.
And I wouldn't be so sure that the Russian marines (I will check their ORBAT as soon as possible) won't use them.
In fact, the T-64 is a tank that could still find its use with a marine unit: it's smaller and lighter than a T-72, it has fording capabilities, it has enough firepower to give support to infantry ... and probably it is available in huge numbers and if you use it, you will not have to take better more reliable tanks from units that need them more.
Honestely, til now I haven't seen a piece of evidence that shows that those tanks aren't deploying with Russian troops.
It doesn't seem believable that Russia, who just augmented its millitary presence in the fronteer of the Ukrain and is trying to impose the federalization of that country would allow the Ukrainians to take their tanks to the mainland and even less that they would do the favor of transporting them.
Also don't think that the Russian troops photographed in the field near the tank, where just looking for "griby" and "klubniki" and just by accident, found a modernized T-64.
Lets keep bringing the info we can find.
All the best,
todorovicandreas
Austria
Joined: May 01, 2007
KitMaker: 608 posts
Armorama: 593 posts
Joined: May 01, 2007
KitMaker: 608 posts
Armorama: 593 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2014 - 08:15 AM UTC
Hello guys,
George, interesting Info. André, you probably mean tridentmilitary.com? Try this for ukrainian patches:
http://www.tridentmilitary.com/Ukrainianmilitaria/Ukrainianpatches.html
But honestly I too beliebe now that those are ukrainian Tanks. Why? Just focus on the background were the Griffon is on, 3 white corners and the upper left in blue-yellow, exactly how ukraines Navy uses it. Look here:
http://www.tridentmilitary.com/new-photos21/udt15.jpg
Or here with different symbol
http://www.tridentmilitary.com/new-photos21/udt16.jpg
The Griffon remains my Mystery.
As for returning ukrainian Tanks - thats maybe some sort of de-escalation?
Anyway, I really appreciate this discussion.
Andreas
George, interesting Info. André, you probably mean tridentmilitary.com? Try this for ukrainian patches:
http://www.tridentmilitary.com/Ukrainianmilitaria/Ukrainianpatches.html
But honestly I too beliebe now that those are ukrainian Tanks. Why? Just focus on the background were the Griffon is on, 3 white corners and the upper left in blue-yellow, exactly how ukraines Navy uses it. Look here:
http://www.tridentmilitary.com/new-photos21/udt15.jpg
Or here with different symbol
http://www.tridentmilitary.com/new-photos21/udt16.jpg
The Griffon remains my Mystery.
As for returning ukrainian Tanks - thats maybe some sort of de-escalation?
Anyway, I really appreciate this discussion.
Andreas
SHarjacek
Croatia Hrvatska
Joined: January 29, 2011
KitMaker: 977 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Joined: January 29, 2011
KitMaker: 977 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2014 - 08:17 AM UTC
Hi Guys, don't have enough time to read all the comments and be a part of the discussion unfortunately.
However I found another interesting video by TV Zvezda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ShAMkMeOAo
However I found another interesting video by TV Zvezda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ShAMkMeOAo
Modelfreak04
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2014 - 09:18 AM UTC
Hey!
Sven and Andreeas,
Thank you for the links you posted.
Andreeas, I still didn't check the links you send me, since I went straight for the vídeo. It may be the site I was looking for.
The vídeo was a real pleasure for the clear images of the T-64 tank. The best vídeo on this tank I've ever seen.
My Russian is still very poor, but as far as I understood, this are Ukrainian tanks, but I didn't understod if they are being delievered back to the Ukrainians or not.
I can have a translation of this vídeo by tomorrow night and I will post here more precise data.
I confess that I find weird that they may be returning the tanks, even more when all news indicate that Russia just augmented the number of troops in the Ukrainian border.
But hard evidence is hard evidence!
Sven and Andreeas,
Thank you for the links you posted.
Andreeas, I still didn't check the links you send me, since I went straight for the vídeo. It may be the site I was looking for.
The vídeo was a real pleasure for the clear images of the T-64 tank. The best vídeo on this tank I've ever seen.
My Russian is still very poor, but as far as I understood, this are Ukrainian tanks, but I didn't understod if they are being delievered back to the Ukrainians or not.
I can have a translation of this vídeo by tomorrow night and I will post here more precise data.
I confess that I find weird that they may be returning the tanks, even more when all news indicate that Russia just augmented the number of troops in the Ukrainian border.
But hard evidence is hard evidence!
Modelfreak04
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Joined: November 10, 2013
KitMaker: 54 posts
Armorama: 54 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2014 - 09:26 AM UTC
Andreas,
Thank you for the links.
The site I was refering isn't this.
It didn't offer anything for sale and it had the pictures of the diferente units shields on the right of the screen.
If I manage to find it again, I will post the link here.
Best,
Thank you for the links.
The site I was refering isn't this.
It didn't offer anything for sale and it had the pictures of the diferente units shields on the right of the screen.
If I manage to find it again, I will post the link here.
Best,
ruzzaa
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 17, 2007
KitMaker: 197 posts
Armorama: 189 posts
Joined: October 17, 2007
KitMaker: 197 posts
Armorama: 189 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2014 - 07:32 PM UTC
André Silva, You Think Right is Wrong.
If you don't believe the tanks are Ukrainian that's Ok, but
STOP trying to discredit the facts to suit your on ideas.
May be it's time to move on from this.
If you don't believe the tanks are Ukrainian that's Ok, but
STOP trying to discredit the facts to suit your on ideas.
May be it's time to move on from this.