Quoted Text
Great work on the buckets. I have reservations on 4 Radios as the 1780 only has control functions for three C (Primary TX/RX), A (TX/RX) and B (RX - typically a 125 or 160. The 524 (46/47) was usually carried as the primary radio and if only one was carried it is invariably a 524.
Wayne, the hatch locking mech you show was only introduced in 1994 as a knee jerk reaction to a stolen APC (The fact it was stolen by someone with the keys to the vehicle was irrelevant.) They were an utter lady to fit and caused all sorts of problems.
Cheers
Al
Thanks for the feedback - about the only radio reference I have for Niner was that it had four aerials, and an interior shot shows sandbags on the floor in 1966, so the interior is representative, and only glimpses can be seen in any case. Looking though the top hatch, the most visible features are the sandbag fllor and seats, and the radios appear as indistinct blobs.
All of these builds are basically tests to burn up some of the accessories of varying quality I've had loitering about for the last couple of decades and learn some of the tricks needed to build a good Aussie Bucket.
I plan to build a fully detailed series of M113A1s in Somalia during Op Solace in 1993, putting in to practice what I have learned from these "basic fun" builds.
All that said, I still reckon that a sound base kit of an M113 is still sorely lacking, and I am at a loss as to why a decent representation of this common and readily accessible vehicle has not come to pass.
The Academy M113 has some nice bells and whistles, but the fuel cell is waaaay oversized, and you need to use the Tamiya top deck and engine hatch if you're going to build an "A1".
The T50 turrets are hit and miss, and the best I have used so far is the very good Aussie Armour offering, but I am yet to take a look at the Firestorm and latest Mousehouse turrets (watch for a review soonest).
To start to build a decent M113A1, you really need to "cross kit" the Tamiya and Academy kits, and I don't like the way the front lights in either is represented.
One big saving grace with the Academy kit is that you get rubber band and indy track links - the band track can be used to replace the woeful Tamiya track which is void of inner face detail, when fitting teh shrouds (the tracks are too tight, but the shrouds hide the top run), and the indy links are great for spares (the Aussie carriers in Rwanda had two lots of four on front, and a length of 10 stowed under the open cargo hatch.
Meanwhile, the Tamiya interior has a one piece engine access hatch, but the bench seats are unusable - meaning you need to use the Academy items, which aren't quite right, but better.
Regardless of which base kit you use, neither has a fuel cell that looks like anything I have ever seen! The Mousehouse replacement is a cheap, no fuss and accurate fix.
The Tamiya trim vanes are too short and unuseable. The Academy ones are spot on dimensionally, but earlier examples have detail differences.
And, yes, the driver's hatches in Rwanda and Somalia did not have the "spider lock" - I have clear evidence of this in photos. which I will scan and post sometime soon.