Armor/AFV: Axis - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Axis forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Tiger Evolution
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Monday, February 07, 2011 - 02:21 AM UTC
The cupola didn't have the supports for the umbrella, so you should remove the molded-on tabs.

David
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Monday, February 07, 2011 - 03:46 AM UTC
Hi David! I will do - thanks for the tip.

So - here is WIP VK 45.01 (H)







I have straightened the horn.

Any support or comments would be more than appreciated!

Cheers.


Bill
Abydos
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: August 11, 2005
KitMaker: 231 posts
Armorama: 225 posts
Posted: Monday, February 07, 2011 - 10:32 AM UTC
Hey Bill, i have a silly question , what is the point of high lighting the serial numbers, when they just get painted over and weathered anyway? i am just curious, thats all. still waiting here for those detailing brass parts from china, its taking them alomost a month so far, i recieved my mac in a quicker time frame and that came from there also "laughing" hey your doing a awesome job on this blog, i will post some pics when i get a chance for you ok. i never knew they had a horn before? i learned something, hey that snorkel wont fit inside, for it enters on an angle from the upper back deck, but i did try to make it functiional "laughing" you know it would be cool to make a boneyard with a bunch of tigers, all at different stages of repair like the one shown for the 503 on that website.i beleive it had some panthers "d" there too as well
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 - 12:08 AM UTC
Casting numbers on. I have made these up, but enjoyed applying them.



Catch you later!


Bill
barkmann424
Visit this Community
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: November 23, 2008
KitMaker: 357 posts
Armorama: 353 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 - 11:12 AM UTC
Evening Bill!
Well it had to start somewhere... The casting marks that is! Looks like this is going to be a very in depth build, I was pondering over the interior you have in mind... And was thinking about the level of interior that would have been included in such an early derivation prior to combat. Possibly very little, or maybe the whole kit and caboodle? It would have had a mechanism for the deployment of the 'Vor' bit... David?
Have you got Feist and Culver's "Tiger 50th Anniversary" Tome published by Ryton? This has a nice crisp image of this particular beast, with less of the grainy tones of other copies of the above image. The book also contains a lot of clear interior shots of the two captured Tunisian Tigers.

Keep the faith, fellow Tiger tamer!

Cheers Phil.
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 - 02:08 AM UTC
Hiya Phil!

I might have changed my mind about an interior...he he.

Assembling the fantastic resin MasterClub tracks & preparing the MR Models Vorpanzer;



Catch you later!
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 - 08:46 AM UTC
Vorpanzer on;



Now awaiting tracks & hubcaps. This has been a nice fast build.


Bill
Braille
#135
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: August 05, 2007
KitMaker: 1,501 posts
Armorama: 1,485 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 10, 2011 - 02:47 AM UTC
Bill,

Looks good. I had noticed that you cast a hubcap for these drive sprockets and had also posted a pic of the original drive sprockets. The drive sprocket hubcaps that you cast are a newer casting found on Tigers sent to Africa. Although both are used on the initial Tiger production vehicles the newer ones are seen in photos on the later production patches. You have a separate set of hubcaps for the drive sprockets in the new 6600 Initial Production Tiger I kit that you could cast and use on this build?

Phil, thanks for the headups on the title by Feist and Culver's "Tiger 50th Anniversary" I ordered a new copy.

Keep it coming!
-Eddy
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 10, 2011 - 06:38 AM UTC
Hi Eddy; I will have had a good look at the hubcap style you mention - I see what you mean; do have a DML 6600 in the stash & might be able to use those, yes.

Progress so far;









Just waiting for the hubcaps - what a coincidence!

Whilst I am waiting I think I will have a tinker with Fgst 250014, October 1942's version. Funnily enough they have the 'fatter' Academy-style hubcaps & I was going to use them for 250014, so I will do a straight swop.

Cool - thanks again for the heads-up Eddy!

Bill
Abydos
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: August 11, 2005
KitMaker: 231 posts
Armorama: 225 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 10, 2011 - 12:34 PM UTC
Looking good Bill, looks kinda odd with the extra plate on the front, but i realize you doing the one from the factory the was presented to Hitler. hey did you know that the snorkle, goes on the the other side, instead of the drivers side, i just found that out by looking at some photos from 131 at the bovington museum. oh well hey just about finished and ready to start painting it. i tryed to post some photos the other day, but it said that i didnt have enough space, so i have to delete some of the older ones before i upload them.
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 10, 2011 - 11:50 PM UTC
Whilst I am waiting for the resin sprocket hubs I will crack on with the modelling; for the fifth & final incarnation of DML 6252 I intend to create Fgst 250014; rolling off the production line in October 1942 and onto flatbed rail transport to North Africa via Italy. I have four reference photos from Trojca's Tiger 1942-1943 Vol 1 and some excellent TD's from Jentz & Doyle's DW to Tiger 1.

The build will include;

DML 6252
Tiger Model Designs Tiger mantlet #1
Voyager Model Tiger 1 hubs for removing outer road wheels
Tank Workshop Tiger 1 early muzzle brake w/canvas cover
Friul Tiger 1 transport tracks
Voyager Model Tiger 1 Initial PE35346





Should be a fun build.
trex10
Visit this Community
Upper Austria, Austria
Joined: January 17, 2011
KitMaker: 70 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2011 - 07:13 PM UTC
Hi Bill,

Thanks for your DAK model advice. I catched a Tamiya DAK Tiger from spruebrohters... here its out of production and hard to find and then expensive.

A (probably) stupid question: Why are you using DRAGON Tiger 6252 and not the new 6600 as basic.
Is 6252 more suitable or because you have them in enough amount in your "private storage " ?
Actually 6252 is sold in German/Austrian ebay at 50-55 €, the new 6600, I get from my local dealer for 43€ and as I heard is more accurate than the 6252.

Erich
GewoonWouter
Visit this Community
Antwerpen, Belgium
Joined: March 31, 2010
KitMaker: 227 posts
Armorama: 123 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2011 - 08:09 PM UTC
Erich: I just think Bill got hold of whole hidden stash of 6252

Strange that you pay a lot for Tamiya's DAK Tiger...although it might be out of production, I bought it last year for around 30 €

Billbo...I'll be following you here as well buddy :-D

cheers
Byrden
Visit this Community
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 12, 2011 - 12:24 AM UTC

Quoted Text

the new 6600, I get from my local dealer for 43€ and as I heard is more accurate than the 6252.

Erich



6252 has individual track links, 6600 has DS tracks and it covers both handed and standard types.

6600 has a number of small detail improvements, including a better rear turret bin and rear wall tool storage.

David
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 12, 2011 - 02:30 AM UTC
Intrigue!

Hi Erich, Wouter & David.

When I built December 1942; Fgst 250053 I sourced a relatively rare Tamiya DAK from China for £24. Shortly after building that one suddenly Tamiya re-released their DAK kit & it is in most LHS's I go into nowadays.

Why am I building DML 6252 for this one? Well; I have one each of DML 6252 & DML 6600 left in the stash - the hull top is more generic from DML 6600, whereas the hull top for DML 6252 has more defined options (fewer) without scratching & filling. Further; it'll be the last time I use the all-in-one turret for an Initial as I will be using the two-piece turret from a Fehrmann Tiger with DML 6600 to create a December/January build; either Tiger 323 from sPzAbt 503 or else Tiger 411 of LAH; I can't quite decide, but have researched 323 extensively & have a superb unit-specific Gepack Kasten from Voyager Model. Each DML 6252 I bought along the way paying no more than £40 for (the last was £32). I think DML 6600 is an excellent kit, but for my purposes neither kit offers me the tracks that I want to use. I suppose 6252 has the edge on extras, but I find the only one I really use now is the brass spare antenna rod, however, 6600 does offer the reticular engine mesh screens, so that is good - along with adjustable sprocket hub options, which 6252 does not offer. The additional 6600 was picked up for £30 from my LHS 2 weeks ago in a sale. Further; the turret from DML 6252 offers mirror MP Klappen, which Fgst 250014 has, so just in case I need the option of a twin-left handed Initial turret, I will keep the DML 6600 turret shell in the spares box after building 323/411.

One more thing to say about DML 6600; the turret roof has an option for the loaders periscope, whereas DML 6252 does not; because of this reason, the more generic hull top, the reversible right-side MP Klappe, the in-box PE mesh screens and the options for the sprocket wheels DML 6600 is a better kit IMHO.

PS David; can you confirm my thoughts on Tigers 323 & 411 - were they both late December 1942/January 1943 Tigers?

Thanks for looking!


Bill

PS the AM line-up for Fgst 250014 has changed slightly. I will let you know what I intend to do once I have factored in the alternatives.
Braille
#135
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: August 05, 2007
KitMaker: 1,501 posts
Armorama: 1,485 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 12, 2011 - 10:41 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi Eddy!

Than you for your technical inpout - your help is truly appreciated. I would really like it if you stuck around on the next few builds - it looks like you are a fountain of knowledge!


Bill




Bill,

I will stick around, however, I know very little if anything about the Tiger passed the initial production vehicles and stand to learn a great deal from you, Phil, Grant and David both here and from his informative and extremely helpful Tiger I website. I am however honored that you have asked me to stick around and that I will do. Being that you have endeavored your builds per say ‘Tiger Evolution’, I was wondering if you would not be including the origins leading up to the Tiger – VK3001(H), VK36.01 and the VK45.01(P)?

Just some thoughts?
-Eddy
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 12, 2011 - 11:12 AM UTC
Hi Eddy!

Funny you should mention that - have a look at this - VK 3001 (H). I did fancy doing the later Tiger ancestor, but I think I will stick with the programme...



For another shot & the background on the build - have a look here;

VK 3001 (H)


Bill
trex10
Visit this Community
Upper Austria, Austria
Joined: January 17, 2011
KitMaker: 70 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 12, 2011 - 10:05 PM UTC
Hi Bill and David,
Thanks for your infos, now I know how to go on for the Tunisian Tigers.

Only as Info:
You can buy on German ebay actually a Cyber-Hobby Tunisian Tiger either for 499,99 € or 399,00 € (no comma mistake, they wants fourhoundred Euro) what you prefer.
So for this amount, I can invest a lot in DML 6600´s and aftermarket additional parts..

Erich
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 - 08:39 AM UTC
Hi Guys



Because I have become a bit fuddled with the time-line on this uber-blog I have intended for some while to create a web-database of the Tiger Evolution; I have now managed to start the ball rolling on a blogspot, similar to Panzers In Scale, which has been a great deal of fun to create. I have linked these new web pages on Panzers In Scale & it is called "Tiger Werkstätte".

If you would like to watch this database grow over the coming years, please feel free to pop in once in a while - it will contain clear, concise data and photographs of the completed Tiger Evolution models before paint, then primed and finally the fully painted projects, each one clearly linked by a time-line index.

Please follow this link if you are interested;

Tiger Werkstätte

All the best & thanks for taking the time to have a dekko.


Bill
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 - 08:43 AM UTC
Initial Tiger 1, Fahrgestell 250014

This is an October 1942 production Tiger and I have sourced four photgraphs of it in Jentz & Doyle DW to Tiger 1 and Trojca Tiger 1 1942-1943, vol 1. It was photographed in-transit to the sPzAbt 501, and was to be deployed in North Africa. It was shipped to North Africa via Reggio di Callabria, but photographs show it before it reached its destination, or the Werkstätte, which would have converted it to a Tunisian or DAK Tiger 1.

The identifying points of this production are;

• This Tiger had OVM tools in an early configuration, the jack being stowed vertically on the rear plate
• KFF2 periscopic sights for the driver above the driver’s visor
• It had wing-nuts for fording gear on the MG ball
• This Tiger had a Henschel-style mantlet
• The MP Klappen were symmetrical
• There were no S-mine launchers or smoke-launchers on this Tiger 1
• There were bent narrow lightweight front mudguards and a hole drilled for ‘lorry camouflage’ on the glacis plate
• The sprocket wheel hub was the later DAK style
• This Tiger had transport tracks in the photographs I have seen
• There were rain cover posts on the cupola
• The forward sections of the hull had holes for tow shackles
• The turret roof extraction fan had an armoured cover applied
• There were hatch hooks on the rear hull deck grates and the engine hatch
• There was an oblique early-style crank starter plate
• There was towing apparatus on the lower hull rear plate
• The engine hatch a rectangular air intake aperture in the forward position
• The exhausts had no shrouds, but did have flappers, which were symmetrically orientated facing inwards
• The rear mudguards were standard for the Initial Tiger 1
• This Tiger had a circular convoy light
• As with all production Tigers, Fgst 250014 had armoured guards around the final drives
• This Tiger had blanking plate at the site of the (now defunct) metal antenna base at the upper right of the rear plate; it did have a rubber antenna mount on the right side of the hull roof
• There is also a small reflector mounted to the lower left side of the hulls rear plate
• This Tiger was painted RAL8020
• Tiger 1 early 88mm barrel
• Initial style gun mantlet
• Low-sling Panzer III-style turret bin
• No spare track carriage
• Reverse tow cable stowage
• Initial style crank starter mount
• No Feifel apparatus
• Hull-mounted twin Bosch lights
• Circular armoured wiring hubs for the hull light wiring points
• No side fenders
• No mounted tool box
• Mounting points on the rear plate for Feifel
• Smoke dischargers on each side of the turret
• Two longer cleaning rods on the upper left hull and three longer cleaning rods on the right, total five cleaning rods
• A fire extinguisher was deployed on the engine deck
• There were no rectangular flanges around the engine deck filler caps
• The crowbar was the shorter version, which was deployed in a parallel fashion on the left upper hull
• There were no locking fillets on the hull sides
• DAK-style track changing cable on the hull side


This project used the following items;

• Dragon PzKpfwVI Ausf E SdKfz 181, Tiger 1 Initial Production, ref 6252
• Friul Tiger 1 transport tracks
• Voyager Model Tiger 1 Initial Type PE set, ref PE35346
• Voyager Model DAK Tiger 1 PE set
• Voyager Model Tiger 1 barrel & mantlet
• Academy Tiger 1 cast resin hubs on Dragon sprocket wheels
Major-Hazard
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: July 14, 2008
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 - 08:45 AM UTC
Progress;





Detailing and running gear to come!
trex10
Visit this Community
Upper Austria, Austria
Joined: January 17, 2011
KitMaker: 70 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 - 06:59 PM UTC
Hi Bill,

Because as you (and cour build blog) have infected me with the Tiger virus, I have spent over the last week´s lot of time to analyze pic. of Tunisian Tigers.
I even bought Trojca´s Tiger 1942-43 Vol 1 (which is by the way a wonderfull one)
I am especially interested in the used colours of the Tunisian Tiger´s.
Analyzing the very clear pics. about transportation and loading of 250014 and 250012 on/off in Italy and Tunisia, I come to the heretic conclusion that this Tiger`s was not painted in RAL8020 as Trojca write.
The colour shade is to dark for 8020, so it must have been RAL8000.
As I have pointed out here https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/168231&page=1
I was travelling around 20 years trough the Sahara with 2 different trucks in RAL8000 matt. So I have lot of colour photos showing them in different Desert conditons, even in Tunisia.
Furthermore, I have a company demo truck painted in RAL8020 for military presentations (Note: The colour was remixed from a german paint producer, specialized even in Wehrmacht colour tones, by using an original RAL-chart from 1942 for the RAL8020)



If you make this picture simply b/w, it looks like this



RAL8020 is much brighter than the photos in Trojca`s book shows the colour of the Tiger´s.
For comparison, pictures of my U404 painted in RAL8000, photographed 22 years ago in an hungarian off-roaf area and in Tunisia March/April 1989, so in the same period as the Tigers has fought there.
Original colour ones:





and even this, made in March/April 1989 some kilometers south of Sbeitla



and here the b/w version for comparison:







Note: all the pic. from the U404 are made always with the same camera and the same film (Fuji 200 21DIN/100 ASA) and has been simply scanned in by myself some days ago. The b/w version was only made by change of the colour in IRFANVIEW and not overworked.

If you compare this RAL8000 b/w photos with the photos in Trojcas´s book, the colour tone has the same “grey” and is much darker than RAL8020 will be in reality, if you look at my demo-truck photo for comparison.
On b/w photos RAL8020 is very close to the “Dunkelgelb” RAL7028, for which you have even some interesting photo-shades in Trojca´s book, from different units, supplied with new Tigers, painted in RAL7028

Erich
Bratushka
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: May 09, 2008
KitMaker: 1,019 posts
Armorama: 657 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 24, 2011 - 12:24 AM UTC
Oh no! Not the paint analysis from from old B&W and color photos again! This thread is far too interesting and informative to go down that divergent, rocky, boulder strewn path again!

Please no!!!!!!!

It has several looooong threads of its own already! Please, not again!
trex10
Visit this Community
Upper Austria, Austria
Joined: January 17, 2011
KitMaker: 70 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 24, 2011 - 12:30 AM UTC
Sorry Jim,

I have not known about this dicussions in the past and I dont want to be boring.
So maybe the moderators can cancell my thread asap.

Erich
Bratushka
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: May 09, 2008
KitMaker: 1,019 posts
Armorama: 657 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 24, 2011 - 03:50 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Sorry Jim,

I have not known about this dicussions in the past and I dont want to be boring.
So maybe the moderators can cancell my thread asap.

Erich



No, no! My comments were offered with a wink and a nod! There have been several debates here about what photos do/don't show. The discussions have been long, lively, and intense with much passion on every side. It's
one of those things that can go waaaaaay off the topic!

Great pictures by the way!