Tank Destroyer and SPG geeks,
I don’t know how some of you people manage the time to post updates just about everyday? I’m envious! Anyhow here is my latest update. As I had mentioned on my last posting this won’t be a step-by-step build but I will point out deficiencies with this kit as I move along hopefully to help anyone else interested in putting one of these kits together. I somehow managed one of those wild brain farts and forgot to mention Rick ‘CLOVIS899’ Cooper’s excellent and inspiring review of this kit. You can click on the
LINKY here if you’re interested in checking out the review. Well, here’s where I’m at on the kit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad297/ad2971c01d6f743002fa3f8a053922e369c69c56" alt=""
I had forgotten to mention on my last posting that step 4 in the assembly instructions will have you remove all of the muffler brackets and guide pins (circled in red), don’t even think about doing that! Just leave this part (V33) as it comes in the box and fix it to your model. As Matt ‘BigSmitty’ Smith, mentions that you won’t be able to shoehorn the rear idler shaft assemblies on the model if you fix this part to the hull first. He is correct if you do happen to fix all of the rear idler shaft parts together and are building your kit as per the steps. You could however fit this part to the hull first, as I have done, provided the idler shaft assemblies are still unassembled.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df48/1df48e6fa5156906f58f5271daef3a68d70f6473" alt=""
I did run into a bit of a scuffle when I went to test fit the fenders to the hull. I had previously fixed both parts (V38 & V39) from step 3 to the hull and discovered that the fenders already had a similar set molded to them; I think these fenders came from a Stug III kit? Anyhow, the photograph pretty much covers what I did to remedy that issue. There are also wrong part number call-outs for the fenders on the assembly instructions; I have here included the correct part number call-outs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42cac/42cacbdaaa90b2671a48a82cc15025e7e59627b7" alt=""
Oh me, oh my! When I went to test fit the casemate housing (T21) and front casemate armor plate (T3) to the fenders and hull I discovered that two of the four locating dowel pins needed to be removed on the front casemate armor plate and one of them fixed to a new location. I had previously drilled out the location holes on the fenders for the casemate as per step 8 and again to my surprise, or not, the locating dowel pins on the casemate could only mate up to either the right or left fender but not both at the same time (hope this is making sense).
Long story short (no such thing when trying to explain Dragon instructions) , two of the four dowel pins on the front casemate armor plate were removed (red arrows at bottom of photograph). When I fitted the casemate over the left fender (B25) the casemate sat asymmetrical on the chassis and when fitted to the right fender (B26) the casemate sat symmetrical over the chassis. To determine how the casemate is actually suppose to sit I needed to test fit part T16 (see proceeding photograph) to the hull to check where the front armor plates large location flat peg rested on part T16. After seeing that the casemate is suppose to be symmetrical to the chassis I went ahead and used the left fender as a template for relocating the left large dowel pin on the front casemate armor plate (red circle on inset photograph). I also needed to file material away from the bottom of the front casemate armor plate (red arrows on inset photograph) to get the casemate to come down even without any gaps on the fenders and part T16. A small pin vise and drill were used to open the Driver’s periscope holes on the front casemate armor plate (red circle on small inset photograph).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/517f9/517f9eff6f617dbdd1f3394ccddb0fdd1b3dac52" alt=""
Part T16 didn’t actually sit flat enough on the front transmission housing and I needed to do some sanding (red arrows) in that area to keep from removing more material from the casemates front armor plate (sort of like sharing and dishing out some pain to both parts – yeah that’s it!). I also had a rather conspicuous gap (red arrow on inset photograph) to contend with and I filled that with some thin super glue. Using a small drill bit as a file, the same diameter as the holes on the fenders for receiving the casemates dowel pins, I elongated the openings just enough to accept the casemate. Problem solved! Of course you could just skip the drama and remove all of the dowel pins and glue the casemate directly down to the fenders and Part 16. But would anyone want to run the risk of destroying the fine detail on the fenders with soft or liquid cement if you didn’t have too!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a393b/a393b238ad6b3dec5f69f94a17ce9013fbc9a2ec" alt=""
Rear view of the major parts fitted together. The casemate and rear deck are just sitting in place for the photographs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70406/7040698d45676a9d2069c32f816e81daccae6e0c" alt=""
Front view. Now that I have all of the major parts fixed together and test fitted I can move on to the smaller detailed parts. Lets see how much stuff I can install without running into more assembly issues? Don’t get me wrong this is really a nice detailed kit, all it needs is a little tender loving care.
@Hangelafette – Nathan, thanks for the tip on the DEF Model photo-etch, hadn’t heard of them before. Looking forward to seeing how the Academy kit builds up!
@BigSmitty – Matt, I’m following your build as the lower hull on my kit is very similar to yours kits hull and suspension. Nice catch on the forged or casting seam on the swing arms, they could easily be mistaken for heavy casting flash.
@Tailor – Guido, from the looks of your avatar you may actually have some experience with Acetone, or have you been moonlighting with some Braille scale builds like me?
@Nito – John, I think I have you beat on the slow building part, but you do have a nice start. Should there not be another cable for the front lamp too?
@jkb_sprint – John, good to see you’ll still be here participating in this campaign, good on you for not allowing something beyond your control to get the better of you! Will be most interesting to see how the Zaveda PanzerJager – 1 will build up.
@Tojo72 – Anthony, thanks for the welcome. I hope to see some of your work here too! I’m just here to have fun and hopefully kick-start myself back to the workbench.
@WARDUKWNZ – Phill, that is one big fellow with a big gun to boot and already for paint, nice commander too. Are those the kit supplied tracks or what? Holy-molly dude, you actually already put together that brass PE set on the half-track, lets see some close ups!!!
@Itb073 – Sal, your camouflage is nice and bright just right for the weathering process which will tone it down a lot. Good progress on your build.
@1721Lancers – Paul, that is an awesome looking beasty!!! I like the camouflage pattern and added furniture, good idea on the fuel drum, these things probably ate enough fuel for a whole platoon of Panthers or a complete company of Panzer I’s – LOL! You sure wouldn’t catch one of these idling at a fast food port to grab a burrito! Paul, back when Dragon first released the s.IG 33 I wanted to get one but my LHS was always short in supply and I just didn’t bother with trying to get a copy, besides it looked kind’a dumb too, I mean why would anyone in their right mind want to climb aboard a vehicle that advertises such a wonderful target opportunity from any angle or range. But that guns destructiveness is most impressive against erected structures. Personally would not want to be on the receiving end of that gun, there’s no ‘I almost got you’ about it!
@Dragon164 – Rob, you look like you’ve got quite a few projects on the workbench all going at the same time, terrific! Good progress on the SU-100, nice clean PE work too!
@PantherF – Jeff, thanks for posting that photograph depicting the Emil at the museum. Seriously that is one ugly looking vehicle but that gun and manlet just dwarfs the Ferdinand’s menacing 88 and that places this one on the top of my list! Opposing crews facing that weapon probably felt like they were in a paper tank.
@SHAKY962 – Jose, excellent build, thanks for sharing. I like the added tarp on the rear of the vehicle and water bucket, good track sag too.
~ Eddy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6d05/c6d05c07767c7d2a40f981f753febded4baaed0e" alt=""