Hi guys, I'm trying to decide on whether or not to add some stowage items to my long going build. Maybe a couple of rolled up tarps, or a couple of small sections of wood chained down for traction purposes.
Do you think that these things would be a nice eye catching, and realistic addition to the model, or would it come off "tacky and too busy looking"?
I saw an early model Panzer build where someone had chained a couple of small logs on the top side of one of the fenders, and I thought it looked great. Evidently, he had found a picture of that series where the crew had done that to be able to use them for traction to get the machine out of a mud bog sometime during a tricky situation.
Just wondering... if,.. and what,.. you boys that are in "the know" could tell me...what would work in the stowage aspect for an IV J and look really good, and still be within reason.
Thanks, Greg
Hosted by Darren Baker
Stowage Items On WWII Tanks
gkedwards
United States
Joined: August 02, 2013
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 95 posts
Joined: August 02, 2013
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 95 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 10:02 AM UTC
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 10:14 AM UTC
It really depends on what theatre you model your tank in.
If you model your tank in a theatre that had it's supply lines stretched to the limit like in North Africa or the Soviet Union you could literally find anything on the backdecks of tanks. In Africa the two keythings were Petrol and water so these tanks usually carried quite big numbers of Jerrycans with both fluids. In soviet Russia you could find everything From jerrycans and rolled up tarps to Oildrums and even salvaged panzer III storage bins. The wood logs was also a very common sight on Armor rolling around in Russia during WW2 especially with the muddy conditions of Spring and Fall.Do a google search on Black and white images of Panzers in Russia and you will be amazed if you see what panzer crews carried with them.
If you model your tank in a theatre that had it's supply lines stretched to the limit like in North Africa or the Soviet Union you could literally find anything on the backdecks of tanks. In Africa the two keythings were Petrol and water so these tanks usually carried quite big numbers of Jerrycans with both fluids. In soviet Russia you could find everything From jerrycans and rolled up tarps to Oildrums and even salvaged panzer III storage bins. The wood logs was also a very common sight on Armor rolling around in Russia during WW2 especially with the muddy conditions of Spring and Fall.Do a google search on Black and white images of Panzers in Russia and you will be amazed if you see what panzer crews carried with them.
Lonewolf7usa
Michigan, United States
Joined: March 24, 2009
KitMaker: 312 posts
Armorama: 296 posts
Joined: March 24, 2009
KitMaker: 312 posts
Armorama: 296 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 10:16 AM UTC
Ok stowage is all about personal preference. Some tanks and crew had stowage all over the place but then again some tanks had very little or none. So it really depends on the vehicle, the time frame, or a photo you have seen. It's really how far you want to go!! Have Fun!!!!!
PantherF
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 10:31 AM UTC
No chains, just use scale rope as what the crews did back then on US tanks.
Jeff
Jeff
panzerbob01
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 12:15 PM UTC
Greg;
Hi!
Stowage on panzers...
It varied all over the place - unditching beams, gas-cans, barrels, tarps, boxes, personal gear, spare parts, ammo-cans, dining room chairs, rolled carpets, what-have-you! LOTS of stuff appears in pictures throughout WWII and across all theaters.
There ARE some vague patterns by panzer type, time-period, and theater... Poland and the Blitz in France mostly had less stuff - and much less "gas and water" - than did Russia or north Africa campaigns. Earlier tanks often had square-hewn wooden unditching timbers - often with iron fittings. Later, these "formal" things seemed to have mostly disappeared and mid-war tanks sometimes had logs (mostly in Russia...) - increasingly rare as the war went on. Advancing AFV in Russia and in north Africa carried EVERYTHING with them - so were often really loaded. Later in the war, fuel baggage slowed down and many tanks in the east ended up carrying both military and civilian refugees and baggage.
Type matters. Early war small tanks (I and II) generally had less junk. 38(t), III and IV in Russia were beasts of burden, as were any type in Africa. Big tanks - Tigers and Panthers and KT - mostly did not seem to have tons of crap. Tiger I had logs on occasion - Panthers and KT - only very rarely that I know of. Late-war IV - the J is of course a later-war beast - had camo and cans and junk and personal gear. Logs or beams were, at best, very rare on late war IV.
But we German modelers (and others, too) LOVE our clutter! Here's a couple of "early war" pieces from my stable as examples. I tried to capture some of the ambiance of advancers in the Blitz (relatively light-loaded and fresher small tanks) and Op Barbarossa - where beams were IN and fuel precious.
Go look at pics of your type in your chosen period and get a feel for what was common and seen.
Cheers!
Bob
Hi!
Stowage on panzers...
It varied all over the place - unditching beams, gas-cans, barrels, tarps, boxes, personal gear, spare parts, ammo-cans, dining room chairs, rolled carpets, what-have-you! LOTS of stuff appears in pictures throughout WWII and across all theaters.
There ARE some vague patterns by panzer type, time-period, and theater... Poland and the Blitz in France mostly had less stuff - and much less "gas and water" - than did Russia or north Africa campaigns. Earlier tanks often had square-hewn wooden unditching timbers - often with iron fittings. Later, these "formal" things seemed to have mostly disappeared and mid-war tanks sometimes had logs (mostly in Russia...) - increasingly rare as the war went on. Advancing AFV in Russia and in north Africa carried EVERYTHING with them - so were often really loaded. Later in the war, fuel baggage slowed down and many tanks in the east ended up carrying both military and civilian refugees and baggage.
Type matters. Early war small tanks (I and II) generally had less junk. 38(t), III and IV in Russia were beasts of burden, as were any type in Africa. Big tanks - Tigers and Panthers and KT - mostly did not seem to have tons of crap. Tiger I had logs on occasion - Panthers and KT - only very rarely that I know of. Late-war IV - the J is of course a later-war beast - had camo and cans and junk and personal gear. Logs or beams were, at best, very rare on late war IV.
But we German modelers (and others, too) LOVE our clutter! Here's a couple of "early war" pieces from my stable as examples. I tried to capture some of the ambiance of advancers in the Blitz (relatively light-loaded and fresher small tanks) and Op Barbarossa - where beams were IN and fuel precious.
Go look at pics of your type in your chosen period and get a feel for what was common and seen.
Cheers!
Bob
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 12:49 PM UTC
Stowage is good but HUGE mistakes by many modelers are as follows:
1) watch clogging air intakes or vents. No vehicle crew would jeopardize the coolant system of its engine. The same goes for flammable materials near the exhaust.
2) don't block the upper edges of the glacis or the turret. Crew periscopes need the angle to see. Several aftermarket resin sand bag sets would have you blind the driver. Stupid oversight.
3) Don't have anything that if knocked off, would jam the turret traverse. Deadly consequences.
4) tie things down. Imagine going to work in the morning and placing your bag/purse/lunch on your trunk. How many turns would it take you before it disappeared. Many modelers act as if they have no sense of the undulations and violent actions that AFVs actually do.
5) consider physics. The #1 violation are 55 gallon barrels. Yes, some Germans strapped them on for long trips -- but these were removed before combat. Loaded, they'd be in excess of 500 lbs. Yet I've seen modelers strap them to fenders. And crews don't store loose rounds on the engine deck either.
6) personal/valuable goods. everyone steals. No souvenir Luger pistols lying around the Sherman tank.
7) interiors and open topped models. keep the floor clear. These were highly integrated systems which allowed a trained crew to fight and maneuver. A gas mask canister or mess tin or empty shell wouldn't be on the floor -- to roll around and injure the crew.
8) no loose chains! There is no value to them. too dangerous -- clog the suspension. They would be bagged, if needed. Tanks use cables (besides early French and Soviet AFVs). How many dangling chains do you see hanging off of construction equipment on the side of the highway?
Basically, use common sense. Would an actual crew man stow item X at location Y. Is there a better place to put it. Would it be concealed? If you look hard enough, you'll see violations of this common sense in many situations. HTH
1) watch clogging air intakes or vents. No vehicle crew would jeopardize the coolant system of its engine. The same goes for flammable materials near the exhaust.
2) don't block the upper edges of the glacis or the turret. Crew periscopes need the angle to see. Several aftermarket resin sand bag sets would have you blind the driver. Stupid oversight.
3) Don't have anything that if knocked off, would jam the turret traverse. Deadly consequences.
4) tie things down. Imagine going to work in the morning and placing your bag/purse/lunch on your trunk. How many turns would it take you before it disappeared. Many modelers act as if they have no sense of the undulations and violent actions that AFVs actually do.
5) consider physics. The #1 violation are 55 gallon barrels. Yes, some Germans strapped them on for long trips -- but these were removed before combat. Loaded, they'd be in excess of 500 lbs. Yet I've seen modelers strap them to fenders. And crews don't store loose rounds on the engine deck either.
6) personal/valuable goods. everyone steals. No souvenir Luger pistols lying around the Sherman tank.
7) interiors and open topped models. keep the floor clear. These were highly integrated systems which allowed a trained crew to fight and maneuver. A gas mask canister or mess tin or empty shell wouldn't be on the floor -- to roll around and injure the crew.
8) no loose chains! There is no value to them. too dangerous -- clog the suspension. They would be bagged, if needed. Tanks use cables (besides early French and Soviet AFVs). How many dangling chains do you see hanging off of construction equipment on the side of the highway?
Basically, use common sense. Would an actual crew man stow item X at location Y. Is there a better place to put it. Would it be concealed? If you look hard enough, you'll see violations of this common sense in many situations. HTH
gkedwards
United States
Joined: August 02, 2013
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 95 posts
Joined: August 02, 2013
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 95 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 01:11 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Greg;
Hi!
Stowage on panzers...
It varied all over the place - unditching beams, gas-cans, barrels, tarps, boxes, personal gear, spare parts, ammo-cans, dining room chairs, rolled carpets, what-have-you! LOTS of stuff appears in pictures throughout WWII and across all theaters.
There ARE some vague patterns by panzer type, time-period, and theater... Poland and the Blitz in France mostly had less stuff - and much less "gas and water" - than did Russia or north Africa campaigns. Earlier tanks often had square-hewn wooden unditching timbers - often with iron fittings. Later, these "formal" things seemed to have mostly disappeared and mid-war tanks sometimes had logs (mostly in Russia...) - increasingly rare as the war went on. Advancing AFV in Russia and in north Africa carried EVERYTHING with them - so were often really loaded. Later in the war, fuel baggage slowed down and many tanks in the east ended up carrying both military and civilian refugees and baggage.
Type matters. Early war small tanks (I and II) generally had less junk. 38(t), III and IV in Russia were beasts of burden, as were any type in Africa. Big tanks - Tigers and Panthers and KT - mostly did not seem to have tons of crap. Tiger I had logs on occasion - Panthers and KT - only very rarely that I know of. Late-war IV - the J is of course a later-war beast - had camo and cans and junk and personal gear. Logs or beams were, at best, very rare on late war IV.
But we German modelers (and others, too) LOVE our clutter! Here's a couple of "early war" pieces from my stable as examples. I tried to capture some of the ambiance of advancers in the Blitz (relatively light-loaded and fresher small tanks) and Op Barbarossa - where beams were IN and fuel precious.
Go look at pics of your type in your chosen period and get a feel for what was common and seen.
Cheers!
Bob
Hello Bob, Nice effects! and beeutiful weathering too. Glad you pulled them out of their stalls and shared them with me. The effect that I am after is during the period of around October through late December 1944 on the Western front, the Saar Moselle triangle.
I'll do some more research on the web, and try to get a better idea of actual photos during this time frame.
Thanks again, and pretty work
Greg
gkedwards
United States
Joined: August 02, 2013
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 95 posts
Joined: August 02, 2013
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 95 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 01:31 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Stowage is good but HUGE mistakes by many modelers are as follows:
1) watch clogging air intakes or vents. No vehicle crew would jeopardize the coolant system of its engine. The same goes for flammable materials near the exhaust.
2) don't block the upper edges of the glacis or the turret. Crew periscopes need the angle to see. Several aftermarket resin sand bag sets would have you blind the driver. Stupid oversight.
3) Don't have anything that if knocked off, would jam the turret traverse. Deadly consequences.
4) tie things down. Imagine going to work in the morning and placing your bag/purse/lunch on your trunk. How many turns would it take you before it disappeared. Many modelers act as if they have no sense of the undulations and violent actions that AFVs actually do.
5) consider physics. The #1 violation are 55 gallon barrels. Yes, some Germans strapped them on for long trips -- but these were removed before combat. Loaded, they'd be in excess of 500 lbs. Yet I've seen modelers strap them to fenders. And crews don't store loose rounds on the engine deck either.
6) personal/valuable goods. everyone steals. No souvenir Luger pistols lying around the Sherman tank.
7) interiors and open topped models. keep the floor clear. These were highly integrated systems which allowed a trained crew to fight and maneuver. A gas mask canister or mess tin or empty shell wouldn't be on the floor -- to roll around and injure the crew.
8) no loose chains! There is no value to them. too dangerous -- clog the suspension. They would be bagged, if needed. Tanks use cables (besides early French and Soviet AFVs). How many dangling chains do you see hanging off of construction equipment on the side of the highway?
Basically, use common sense. Would an actual crew man stow item X at location Y. Is there a better place to put it. Would it be concealed? If you look hard enough, you'll see violations of this common sense in many situations. HTH
Thanks for the reply Roy. And I know that Schurzen was probably effective for protecting the machine from side attacks. But, I do declare that the mounting brackets and assemblies for those side panels are the messiest, and most dangerous looking obsticles for a crew to have to manuver and walk in and around. I can only imagine how many men cut their legs up trying to weave in and out of all that mess.
Not to mention the items that you have mentioned above. I had thought about those things as well. If I do add anything, it wont be much.
Thanks for your advice sir.
Greg
panzerbob01
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 04:45 PM UTC
@Greg;
Thanks for the kind words I posted these in the spirit of showing what a beam could look like and at least a little take on how things could get placed on a build.
Roy C. did indeed identify several good points about "rules" pertaining to stowage - among them avoiding blocking cooling vents and occluding the turret and, in general, obeying real laws of gravity and physics!
Do keep in mind that tanks existed in many different detailed circumstances during their lives in the unit and at the front - "Rules" of prudent and safe stowage and things like blocking turret movement were frequently voided and vacated during unit road marches - crew piled crap on tanks for road-marches which would certainly have been rapidly put off whenever the tank actually went into combat (assuming that the unit was not, for instance, caught out on a road by some advancing enemy unit...). Many pictures attest to tanks piled high with supplies and kit while in convoy. The much rarer "in combat" photos often depict or catch tanks more as we might expect them to have been when fighting - less crap and stuff.
And these "detailed circumstances" are of course available to us modelers to exploit. IF you are seeking to depict that 38(t) moving forward in a road column on the way to the front... it could indeed have a lot of crap and even really be seriously impaired as a fighting machine. IF your Pz.IV is moving forward in a planned assault... maybe it would be fair to leave the fuel drum behind. And no, I agree with Roy entirely that there were unlikely to be any loose rounds lying on the rear deck at almost any time! (Which, IMO, is a real pity... seeing as we can now-a-days find such really nice-looking brass rounds, it's all too enticing an idea to have a couple of these beauts parked on that rear deck!)
The inspirations for the 38(t) gas-can-in-box-by-muffler (talk about looking at first glance like RISKY behavior!) came from the interesting pics of 38(t) with jerrycans stashed in re-used grouser boxes on the rear deck... right up against the muffler!
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-277-0825-31,_Russland,_Panzer_38%28t%29.jpg
PS: and this other... sporting two cans in the box by the muffler...! (But I only had one can available!)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-213-0267-13%2C_Russland-Nord%2C_Panzer_38%28t%29_und_Infanterie.jpg
and another with the crap-load and the beam...!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-265-0037-10,_Russland,_Panzer_38t.jpg
Cheers!
Bob
Thanks for the kind words I posted these in the spirit of showing what a beam could look like and at least a little take on how things could get placed on a build.
Roy C. did indeed identify several good points about "rules" pertaining to stowage - among them avoiding blocking cooling vents and occluding the turret and, in general, obeying real laws of gravity and physics!
Do keep in mind that tanks existed in many different detailed circumstances during their lives in the unit and at the front - "Rules" of prudent and safe stowage and things like blocking turret movement were frequently voided and vacated during unit road marches - crew piled crap on tanks for road-marches which would certainly have been rapidly put off whenever the tank actually went into combat (assuming that the unit was not, for instance, caught out on a road by some advancing enemy unit...). Many pictures attest to tanks piled high with supplies and kit while in convoy. The much rarer "in combat" photos often depict or catch tanks more as we might expect them to have been when fighting - less crap and stuff.
And these "detailed circumstances" are of course available to us modelers to exploit. IF you are seeking to depict that 38(t) moving forward in a road column on the way to the front... it could indeed have a lot of crap and even really be seriously impaired as a fighting machine. IF your Pz.IV is moving forward in a planned assault... maybe it would be fair to leave the fuel drum behind. And no, I agree with Roy entirely that there were unlikely to be any loose rounds lying on the rear deck at almost any time! (Which, IMO, is a real pity... seeing as we can now-a-days find such really nice-looking brass rounds, it's all too enticing an idea to have a couple of these beauts parked on that rear deck!)
The inspirations for the 38(t) gas-can-in-box-by-muffler (talk about looking at first glance like RISKY behavior!) came from the interesting pics of 38(t) with jerrycans stashed in re-used grouser boxes on the rear deck... right up against the muffler!
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-277-0825-31,_Russland,_Panzer_38%28t%29.jpg
PS: and this other... sporting two cans in the box by the muffler...! (But I only had one can available!)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-213-0267-13%2C_Russland-Nord%2C_Panzer_38%28t%29_und_Infanterie.jpg
and another with the crap-load and the beam...!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-265-0037-10,_Russland,_Panzer_38t.jpg
Cheers!
Bob
AFVFan
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 05:32 PM UTC
If you haven't figured them out, here are the corrected links from Bob's previous post.
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-277-0825-31,_Russland,_Panzer_38%28t%29.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-265-0037-10,_Russland,_Panzer_38t.jpg
As for the cans near the mufflers, they could be holding water, not gas. In fact, in colder weather I wouldn't be surprised to see a water can right on the muffler. What better way to have hot water at the end of a road march or patrol?
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-277-0825-31,_Russland,_Panzer_38%28t%29.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-265-0037-10,_Russland,_Panzer_38t.jpg
As for the cans near the mufflers, they could be holding water, not gas. In fact, in colder weather I wouldn't be surprised to see a water can right on the muffler. What better way to have hot water at the end of a road march or patrol?
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 29, 2013 - 10:54 PM UTC
Quoted Text
But, I do declare that the mounting brackets and assemblies for those side panels are the messiest, and most dangerous looking obsticles for a crew to have to manuver and walk in and around. I can only imagine how many men cut their legs up trying to weave in and out of all that mess.
Greg
Hi Greg: I've read how German tank crews CONSTANTLY drilled how to exit the tank in an emergency. If you think about it, it's a life and death exercise. If a brew up was impending, the crew had seconds to exit.
Thus, it even goes further to the case to not obscure certain egress points of the tank. And crews had to know how to do this in pitch darkness as well.
It was highlighted in an interview I did with a German tank commander who said his tanks' crow bars and sledge hammers were ALWAYS in their prescribed places because of the constant need to fix a broken track pin-- even in the dark, by any member of the crew.
Posted: Monday, September 30, 2013 - 12:17 AM UTC
With the quality in modern kits, loads of etch is not needed anymore, and in most cases is not even seen when the model is painted up and weathered. On the other hand, adding some strategic stowage adds so much more to the finished model. There are some great points lifted above like in Roys case, the no-no´s for stowage and as Robert mentioned the supply lines should be considered before your decision on what stowage should/could be used.
I always consider the artistic view point as well. Stowage can add life and scale to your model, and also colour which adds contrast and helps break up a monotonous and monotone colour scheme. The market has also realised this and there are some fantastic stowage sets available today from Black Dog, Blast and Legends Productions, to name a few. Many of these sets are vehicle specific. Others do individual stowage items for the same purpose ... Verlinden, Value Gear details, Plus Models, etc.
These items make your model look more natural, lived in and even add some character. On a competition table theres nothing worse than looking down at 30 or 40 green models and none of them standing out or locking the viewers eye. Stowage can make the difference. See Lester Plaskitt and Andy Taylors T55 that took gold at this years Euromilitaire for a perfect example of what I mean.
Direct Link
I always consider the artistic view point as well. Stowage can add life and scale to your model, and also colour which adds contrast and helps break up a monotonous and monotone colour scheme. The market has also realised this and there are some fantastic stowage sets available today from Black Dog, Blast and Legends Productions, to name a few. Many of these sets are vehicle specific. Others do individual stowage items for the same purpose ... Verlinden, Value Gear details, Plus Models, etc.
These items make your model look more natural, lived in and even add some character. On a competition table theres nothing worse than looking down at 30 or 40 green models and none of them standing out or locking the viewers eye. Stowage can make the difference. See Lester Plaskitt and Andy Taylors T55 that took gold at this years Euromilitaire for a perfect example of what I mean.
Direct Link
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Monday, September 30, 2013 - 12:31 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I always consider the artistic view point as well
A VERY important point not to be missed. Sometimes, we strive to mimic what's seen in a photo ("It's real life so it's legitimate, right?") but sometimes end up trying to model something that's not aesthetically pleasing. Obviously, it's a personal choice but when I research stuff, sometimes what appears to be a very interesting model subject ends up being plain, butt-ugly if accurately portrayed -- something that I wouldn't enjoy looking at sitting on my shelf. Then it's time to re-orient and look for another photo or subject.
panzerbob01
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Monday, September 30, 2013 - 01:52 AM UTC
Quoted Text
If you haven't figured them out, here are the corrected links from Bob's previous post.
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-277-0825-31,_Russland,_Panzer_38%28t%29.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-265-0037-10,_Russland,_Panzer_38t.jpg
As for the cans near the mufflers, they could be holding water, not gas. In fact, in colder weather I wouldn't be surprised to see a water can right on the muffler. What better way to have hot water at the end of a road march or patrol?
THANKS! for the fix on the links, Bob! I was caught up in doing 3 things at once and all wanted to get done BEFORE each other! But now we have them.
As to the cans in boxes... Yes - they COULD have been full of water. And I love that idea of putting a water can near to the muffler to warm it a bit (done that many times over the years!). But I take the conservative approach with jerry-cans on German tanks; I generally assume that those with water in them were - as frequently seen in pics and constantly argued-for by modelers - clearly marked with white bands, crosses, white W, or even painted all-white. The Germans were extremely compulsive about many things related to crew safety and vehicle survival - among these being to boldly label any jerry-can which contained water. The German jerry-can came with a lining which allowed the same can to be used for any liquid - gasoline, kerosine, diesel fuel, and water all being OK. The potential for fatal confusion was certain. Troopies needed to be able to tell right away if that can contained water or fuel in the dark. This of course does NOT rule out that those un-marked cans seen in the pics could have been "stealth" water-cans, but I think it unlikely. I WOULD, however, be willing to put money on them NOT being empty gas-cans full of vapors - those are really risky!
PS: US jerry-cans, unlike those "one type holds all liquids" German items, came in two models - those made for fuel came with a round screw-lid and a spout which you screwed on, while those made for water had a wide-mouth flip-top cap.
Not to hi-jack this thread, but as we are looking at the stowage issue and the 38(t) as one type-example... This does raise what I think is an interesting question, both for any stowage-safety discussion and to us modelers as we seek to portray conditions and effects in builds! "How HOT was that muffler?"
There are a couple of things that loom "pretty constant" in the pic record: some types of tanks (Pz I and II, Hotchkiss H-3x and Renault R-35, various Japanese machines, etc. come to mind) routinely came with heat-shields on the muffler. Other types - Pz III and IV and derivatives, Panthers, Tigers - all types reputed to run hot and to have "glowing exhaust pipes" - had the exhaust(s) placed behind the tank and out of the way of folks standing or sitting or placing stuff on them. In contrast, 38(t) did not have a shield and was "available". Heat shields on mufflers are to keep people and stuff off the presumably hot item...
I would expect that the Germans - noted even in this thread for being careful about crew and vehicle safety - would have outfitted these with shields were they really hot.
Bob
Posted: Monday, September 30, 2013 - 02:08 AM UTC
Bob,
Your Barbarossa tanks are super! Love the gouges in the rubber road wheels.
Your Barbarossa tanks are super! Love the gouges in the rubber road wheels.
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 - 02:38 AM UTC
Lots of Panzers had home-made racks welded on the rear decks made from steel bar and/or wood planks.
recceboy
Alberta, Canada
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 706 posts
Armorama: 665 posts
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 706 posts
Armorama: 665 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 - 04:39 AM UTC
On my tank in the sandbox, everything was secured down. Nothing to obstruct the turret traverse, nothing to obstruct any intake or grills. Nothing loose or hanging down. Any outside kit was nice and tightly attached to the outside.
Anthony
Anthony
AFVFan
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 - 05:01 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I would expect that the Germans - noted even in this thread for being careful about crew and vehicle safety - would have outfitted these with shields were they really hot.
While some engines run cooler than others due to better design and cooling systems, the exhaust temperatures would be relatively similar on all of them. The main factor for muffler temperature would primarily be how far it is away from the engine. I doubt the muffler on a Pz38 was noticeably cooler than any other vehicle with a similar set up.
gkedwards
United States
Joined: August 02, 2013
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 95 posts
Joined: August 02, 2013
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 95 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 - 01:56 PM UTC
Quoted Text
With the quality in modern kits, loads of etch is not needed anymore, and in most cases is not even seen when the model is painted up and weathered. On the other hand, adding some strategic stowage adds so much more to the finished model. There are some great points lifted above like in Roys case, the no-no´s for stowage and as Robert mentioned the supply lines should be considered before your decision on what stowage should/could be used.
I always consider the artistic view point as well. Stowage can add life and scale to your model, and also colour which adds contrast and helps break up a monotonous and monotone colour scheme. The market has also realised this and there are some fantastic stowage sets available today from Black Dog, Blast and Legends Productions, to name a few. Many of these sets are vehicle specific. Others do individual stowage items for the same purpose ... Verlinden, Value Gear details, Plus Models, etc.
These items make your model look more natural, lived in and even add some character. On a competition table theres nothing worse than looking down at 30 or 40 green models and none of them standing out or locking the viewers eye. Stowage can make the difference. See Lester Plaskitt and Andy Taylors T55 that took gold at this years Euromilitaire for a perfect example of what I mean.
Direct Link
Thanks for the advice, and the example of the T55 is spot on the money, right down to the gear lube soaking into the mud around the axle housings. He really did a fine job on this one.
I can only imagine how many weeks, or months it took to get this kit to the finished product that is in the pictures.