Here is a Cromwell with a Churchill turret:
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Tanks with alternative turrets and guns
JSSVIII
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 02:55 PM UTC
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 03:11 PM UTC
M60A1 chassis + new turret fitted with the 152 mm XM150 long-barreled gun-launcher from the MBT-70 = Chrysler K tank :
H.P.
H.P.
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 03:17 PM UTC
Puma with Luchs turret:
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 03:40 PM UTC
SOMEone's been playing a LITtle too much of world of FANtasy tanks, methinx
JSSVIII
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 03:48 PM UTC
Quoted Text
SOMEone's been playing a LITtle too much of world of FANtasy tanks, methinx
Not me, don't play video games, takes time away from modelling!
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 03:52 PM UTC
Prototype Multiple .50 caliber Gun Motor Carriage T77 on M24 Chaffee tank chassis :
T77E1 variant :
More pics here
H.P.
T77E1 variant :
More pics here
H.P.
JSSVIII
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 03:55 PM UTC
I just noticed, that's SIX .50 cal MGs in that mount, OUCH!
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 04:12 PM UTC
Sherman M4A4 hull + 90mm AA gun = T53E1 :
T31 Demolition Tank :
T33 :
H.P.
T31 Demolition Tank :
T33 :
H.P.
Gore_X
Hessen, Germany
Joined: September 15, 2015
KitMaker: 64 posts
Armorama: 62 posts
Joined: September 15, 2015
KitMaker: 64 posts
Armorama: 62 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 11:42 PM UTC
Hmmm...that brings me back to a build log of a T-34 with the BS-3 Fieldcannon in the turret,that a friend of mine did a few years ago.
It was such a beautiful piece of work...
http://www.dmmb.info/t10825f370-T.html
This thread inspires me to do such a mix as well.
It was such a beautiful piece of work...
http://www.dmmb.info/t10825f370-T.html
This thread inspires me to do such a mix as well.
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 11:58 PM UTC
Trisaw
California, United States
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 01:12 AM UTC
The AAV7 with 30mm remote weapons station looks very interesting.
I usually thought that the turret with .50cal and 40mm MK-19 were both too weak in firepower for today's threat environments.
Does anyone have additional information on this concept and why it didn't go through?
I usually thought that the turret with .50cal and 40mm MK-19 were both too weak in firepower for today's threat environments.
Does anyone have additional information on this concept and why it didn't go through?
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 02:15 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Super M48 (Private venture upgrade. 105mm L7 cannon + Diesel engine) :
H.P.
The M48 already used a diesel and the M68 which was copy of the L7
JSSVIII
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 04:11 AM UTC
This is one of my favorites, the love child of a Conqueror and a Centurion,
Caernarvon:
Caernarvon:
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 10:30 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The M48 already used a diesel and the M68 which was copy of the L7
I should have written "a new Diesel engine":
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/super_m48.htm
H.P.
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 12:38 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Super M48 (Private venture upgrade. 105mm L7 cannon + Diesel engine) :
H.P.
No, the super M48 was a follow-on to the M48A2GA2 which had retained the gas engine of the M48A2, though you are right about the main gun. I remember this one as I had just transitioned from M48A5 to M60A3 so all things M48 was of interest.
---
I know it's not a tank but how come no AEC armored cars with Valentine and Crusader turrets?
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 02:17 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
Super M48 (Private venture upgrade. 105mm L7 cannon + Diesel engine) :
H.P.
The M48 already used a diesel and the M68 which was copy of the L7
It's all a question of timing
The Super M48 was intended as a more affordable way of converting existing M48's to very near M60 standard to make it comparable to modern tanks.
But, the end of the Cold War came in the way, why buy an upgrade to my tired old M48 when I can get M60's, Leopards and other stuff almost for free ....
M48's in some armies had diesels, but maybe not in all armies ...
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/super_m48.htm
"A privately-funded project, the Super M48 was intended to offer users of the M48 Patton an upgrade, which would allow vehicles already in their inventories to compete with more modern MBTs. Though a potentially attractive product for nations unable or unwilling to purchase newer-model MBTs, the timing of the Super M48's arrival onto the market in the mid-1990s could not have been worse. The market was suddenly choked with literally tens-of-thousands of used tanks built in the Cold War, many of which were new and/or well-maintained. Wealthier M48 users could afford to purchase used, reduced cost M1 Abrams', Leopard 2s, and Challenger 1s, while customers with smaller budgets now had access to a flood of T-62s, T-72s, AMX-30s, M60 Pattons, Leopard 1s, and other tanks, that were not only an improvement over M48s, but were also often sold at scrap value (some were even outright given-away to favored clients for free). In this market environment, the Super M48 project was effectively doomed."
Everything needs to be judged in the same "light" as when it originated. Why buy a T-Ford when there are Teslas ? Because Elon Musk hadn't been born yet 100 years ago ...
/ Robin
Edit: Why stick a M1 Abrams look-a-like turret on an M60?
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/120s.htm
or the Super M60:
http://www.military-today.com/tanks/super_m60.htm
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 02:33 PM UTC
Removed by original poster on 08/22/17 - 12:00:12 (GMT).
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 05:24 PM UTC
Have we had this one already?
130 mm type 59-1 gun on Iraqi T-55 (or maybe the MEK "guerilla" operating against Iran in the Iran-Iraq war)
http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/Iraq/T-55-130SPG
Huh!??
North Korean Koksan (also used by Iran?)
130 mm type 59-1 gun on Iraqi T-55 (or maybe the MEK "guerilla" operating against Iran in the Iran-Iraq war)
http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/modern/Iraq/T-55-130SPG
Huh!??
North Korean Koksan (also used by Iran?)
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 05:32 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Have we had this one already?
Yes but your picture is better than the one I've posted
The XM246 General Dynamics competitor to the M247 Sergeant York in the DIVAD project, based on a M48 chassis, like all the competitors :
Full size
The Sperry one :
and the General Electric one (fitted with a GAU-8 30mm Gatling-type autocannon) :
I'm still looking for a picture of the Raython entrant that used a modified Gepard turret...
Here's an older forerunner, the Canadian Skink :
H.P.
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 06:41 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The AAV7 with 30mm remote weapons station looks very interesting.
I usually thought that the turret with .50cal and 40mm MK-19 were both too weak in firepower for today's threat environments.
Does anyone have additional information on this concept and why it didn't go through?
Not sure why the project didn’t get fielded. Could be cost? Or loss of some utility? Turret mounted directly atop vehicle which meant loss of use of cargo hatches. Would of made a huge improvement over the UGWS though.
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Monday, August 21, 2017 - 07:39 PM UTC
John, that's not a Churchill turret on the A27 hull but a Vauxhall cast turret design for a Cromwell. The roof layout matches the A27 rather than Churchill. Prototype only though, as far as I know.
Removed by original poster on 08/22/17 - 15:23:14 (GMT).
firstcircle
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: November 19, 2008
KitMaker: 2,249 posts
Armorama: 2,007 posts
Joined: November 19, 2008
KitMaker: 2,249 posts
Armorama: 2,007 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 - 03:18 AM UTC
Another that's been kitted by Hobby Boss:
JSSVIII
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 - 03:35 AM UTC
Quoted Text
John, that's not a Churchill turret on the A27 hull but a Vauxhall cast turret design for a Cromwell. The roof layout matches the A27 rather than Churchill. Prototype only though, as far as I know.
Thank you for correcting me on that one Robert, I had no Idea. I'll have a new search to do now to see if I can find any more info.