Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
I simply love DS-tracks from Dragon
RobinNilsson
Staff MemberTOS Moderator
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 04:47 AM UTC

Quoted Text

...

But PLEASE don't tell me that you'll buy the mix with crappy frosting just because it says Dunkin Hines on it!

Bob



Išll buy it.
The inlaws are coming for dinner and I promised to bake them a cake
RobinNilsson
Staff MemberTOS Moderator
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 04:49 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I have wondered if Dragon changed the formula for the DS tracks along the way? I have kits with DS tracks that I bought in 07,08 and the tracks look okay, no oily residue in the package and some I got in the last couple of years that show signs of deterioration. Its a shame that they dont last, as I do like them.



Maybe it is a combination effect with the plastic in the little bags they seal the tracks in?
I checked a few of my kits and the plastic bags feel slightly different to the touch. The ones that feel crispy don't seem to have deteriorating DS-tracks
cabasner
Visit this Community
Nevada, United States
Joined: February 12, 2012
KitMaker: 1,083 posts
Armorama: 1,014 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 05:47 AM UTC
Oddly enough, I just found that EXACT situation with the tracks in an unbuilt Dragon M1A2 SEP kit I looked at this week. Scary stuff that liquified plastic!
27-1025
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 06:35 AM UTC
This thread intrigued me, so I went and checked through some of my Dragon stash. So to be fair I looked at three Dragon Tiger I', a StuG IV and a Panzer IVH and a Sherman III, all of which have the DS tracks and all of them were okay, in good shape. Most of my kits are stored in an outbuilding with limited climate control so they experience a pretty wide range of temps. Hard to speculate what might have occurred with your tracks.
panzerbob01
Visit this Community
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 07:57 AM UTC

Quoted Text

This thread intrigued me, so I went and checked through some of my Dragon stash. So to be fair I looked at three Dragon Tiger I', a StuG IV and a Panzer IVH and a Sherman III, all of which have the DS tracks and all of them were okay, in good shape. Most of my kits are stored in an outbuilding with limited climate control so they experience a pretty wide range of temps. Hard to speculate what might have occurred with your tracks.



The really useful "operative word" is "SPECULATE".

There are those whose DS tracks have remained fine for the decade+ that they may have been around - either in a stored kit or on a build. Other's experience has run far different.

NOBODY here actually KNOWS exactly what set of environmental conditions lead to better longevity and stability versus worse. IF you / we did KNOW this, we could all presumably attain "success" with the DS tracks.

But WAIT... There is another UNKNOWN tossed into this swamp of technical ignorance leading to "my special case" reporting and SPECULATION about what is actually happening... As raised by at least one poster here, there is that other question of "Has Dragon CHANGED the DS formula over the years?". That possibility just further muddies these waters!

IF there was but ONE formula, it is conceivable that folks could arrive at a sort of understanding about what set of temp, air-quality, gas-and-vapor exposure, contact exposure with other materials, light, etc. (the environmental factors that can affect a chemical compound) lead to best DS survival - if enough people punted forth their detailed observations and results. But IF the formula has actually CHANGED... all of that previous becomes just a mess of "my special case and experience", and sussing out any useful pattern is, at best, super difficult.

So, we are all just zooming around reporting our "special cases" and experience, as if our case was the definitive one. It ISN'T. The FACT that many folks have had bad experiences is the critical TELL. We don't KNOW WHY, nor what exactly created or drove their bad experiences. The COMMONALITY is the DS - in some formula or another.

I feel glad for all whose DS hasn't "gone south". Lucky you! I feel greatly for those whose DS HAS died. And I'm glad that I have largely avoided getting any into my stash!

Cheers! Bob
Kevlar06
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 08:22 AM UTC

Quoted Text



...NOBODY here actually KNOWS exactly what set of environmental conditions lead to better longevity and stability versus worse. IF you / we did KNOW this, we could all presumably attain "success" with the DS tracks.

But WAIT... There is another UNKNOWN tossed into this swamp of technical ignorance leading to "my special case" reporting and SPECULATION about what is actually happening... As raised by at least one poster here, there is that other question of "Has Dragon CHANGED the DS formula over the years?". That possibility just further muddies these waters!

IF there was but ONE formula, it is conceivable that folks could arrive at a sort of understanding about what set of temp, air-quality, gas-and-vapor exposure, contact exposure with other materials, light, etc. (the environmental factors that can affect a chemical compound) lead to best DS survival...



There has been no change of formula. Dragon has acknowledged they have had "bad batches" of DS plastic in their kits (I used to work in a LHS, and their sales staff did acknowledge this to us on more than one occasion.) The problem is, you don't know what "batches" you are getting in any kit, since the DS process is done separately from the rest of the kit. The problem is due to the chemical makeup of the DS plastic at the factory (the mixture is wrong in some batches), and not due to environmental factors. If you trust Dragon, they've stated they've corrected the problem in their "newer" kits.

But the consumer's problem is knowing where in the product line history their kit lies. The issue is partly Dragons replacement policy as well. Here's what I know-- depending on where you bought your kit (Dragon USA, Dragon EU or Dragon Asia) they may or may not be able to help you with replacements, because they keep limited stock on hand-- and for folks who think they go out and pop new sprues to replace your kit part, that's simply not true for any manufacturer, including Dragon-- what they do is rob complete kits for sprues/parts you report as defective or missing. When the product line is exhausted at the distributor, that's the end of replacements (until they make a subsequent run of kits). Dragon is notorious for keeping very few kits in reserve--there are reasons for this, Dragon's excellent QC program at the factory is just one reason. if you bought one of the kits they "retired" you may be completely out of luck.
VR, Russ
Robbd01
#323
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: February 13, 2013
KitMaker: 791 posts
Armorama: 344 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 08:50 AM UTC
I take it that reaching out to Dragon/DML customer service for replacements is just as bad as posting this thread on their Facebook page?

Cheers
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 09:04 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

...

But PLEASE don't tell me that you'll buy the mix with crappy frosting just because it says Dunkin Hines on it!

Bob



Išll buy it.
The inlaws are coming for dinner and I promised to bake them a cake





And with ALL of the above posts, I hope that this debate may yet be resolved, but it will probably continue. Maybe not in this particular thread, but in some future capacity.

Now as to MORE US/Allied Armor and Figures...


PS- I've just checked my emails, and found that DRAGON has sent me a new pair of fliers. (I have two DRAGON "Wallets" going). There are some sales going on, but nothing to the effect of the "$80.00 Tiger I for $24.95" kind-of-thing. It will STILL pay some of you guys to take a look...
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 09:21 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I take it that reaching out to Dragon/DML customer service for replacements is just as bad as posting this thread on their Facebook page?

Cheers



Hi, Robbie!

Nahhh, I wouldn't even bother with their "Customer Non-Service"... I'll still keep on buying some of their 1/35 kits though, as the need(?) arises...
Scarred
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 11:34 AM UTC
I wonder if it could be a reaction to the mold release agent. I've built one DS track kit a PZ. III and it wasn't an enjoyable experience. I used the old square bottle testors liquid and the few links I glued came apart like yours. Obviously too hot so I went to micro weld which did the job, barely.
nsjohn
Visit this Community
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: July 26, 2018
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 265 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 01:43 PM UTC
After reading this thread I decided to check my stash. I have 9 Dragon kits (one of which as it happens I am currently building). 3 of them are older Orange box kits which have Magic tracks, but the others have DS tracks, 5 of which are Okay, but one set appears to have bonded to the plastic bag, and simply cracked when I flexed it. This is a Firefly 1C which was bought last year, and is not an "old" kit having first been produced in 2012 so it cannot be more than 7 years old. Not impressed, especially since I have recently built some old Tamiya kits which were bought by me in the 1990s with no such difficulties. Anyone know were I can get a set of marketable (non-Dragon) Tracks for the Sherman?
TankManNick
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 01, 2010
KitMaker: 551 posts
Armorama: 543 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 03:34 PM UTC
Had to check! Out of 2 Shermans, 1 Sexton, 1 Priest, 1 Tiger and an M1A2 SEP V2, the Priest tracks were "sweating oil" in their plastic bag and had no flex at all - broke up when I flexed them.

So far the Shermans, Sexton and Tiger still look flexible and the plastic bags are "bright".

The M1A2 track, though still flexible, may be going south. The plastic bag wrapper appears slightly hazy like the oil may just be starting to "sweat" but doesn't yet form noticeable drops. Make sense? Also - though it may be my imagination at this point - the tracks don't quite feel right, like they might be starting to harden.

The strange one is the M4A1 76 (Russian version) which has flexible tracks which are not DS.

Just reinforces the distrust of DS. Based on my entirely non-statistically valid survey I have a 1 in 6 (possibly 1 in 3) chance of bad tracks right now, with possibly worse odds in the future.
Kevlar06
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 05:14 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I wonder if it could be a reaction to the mold release agent. I've built one DS track kit a PZ. III and it wasn't an enjoyable experience. I used the old square bottle testors liquid and the few links I glued came apart like yours. Obviously too hot so I went to micro weld which did the job, barely.




According to what the sales staff had told us, and what I've about read further, the problem is in a chemical stabilizer used to make the DS products soft yet glueable with styrene cements. Too much of this chemical or too little in the mixture either causes hardening or complete breakdown. The problem affects more than just tracks-- the Cybermodel line of ME109Es uses a DS plastic insert in the wheel wells, the Soyuz spacecraft in the Apollo-Soyuz kit is one solid hunk of DS. Some of the accessories in a number of their armor kits are also DS. And some of the components in the Dragon 1/32 aircraft line are also DS.

To be fair, I believe Dragon when they say they have caught the problem, and have checked their QC. But, it doesn't help you folks who have already put those kits in your stash with these problems. For me, I steer clear of Dragon (other than the few kits I already have). But not just because of DS. It's a compilation of issues-- their announcement about concentrating on their toy line (at the expense of the hobby lines), their spotty record of customer service, their pricing policies, and their recent lapses in kit accuracy, have put them in a position where they don't compete well against other companies.

All this is a shame, as they used to be great. They still have some of the greatest kits out there, sadly, many of their recent releases are overpriced and some inexcusable innaccuracies (M106, Hawk, Lance, M48 series, etc.). And they don't seem too concerned about it.
VR, Russ
Scarred
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 07:00 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I wonder if it could be a reaction to the mold release agent. I've built one DS track kit a PZ. III and it wasn't an enjoyable experience. I used the old square bottle testors liquid and the few links I glued came apart like yours. Obviously too hot so I went to micro weld which did the job, barely.




According to what the sales staff had told us, and what I've about read further, the problem is in a chemical stabilizer used to make the DS products soft yet glueable with styrene cements. Too much of this chemical or too little in the mixture either causes hardening or complete breakdown. The problem affects more than just tracks-- the Cybermodel line of ME109Es uses a DS plastic insert in the wheel wells, the Soyuz spacecraft in the Apollo-Soyuz kit is one solid hunk of DS. Some of the accessories in a number of their armor kits are also DS. And some of the components in the Dragon 1/32 aircraft line are also DS.

To be fair, I believe Dragon when they say they have caught the problem, and have checked their QC. But, it doesn't help you folks who have already put those kits in your stash with these problems. For me, I steer clear of Dragon (other than the few kits I already have). But not just because of DS. It's a compilation of issues-- their announcement about concentrating on their toy line (at the expense of the hobby lines), their spotty record of customer service, their pricing policies, and their recent lapses in kit accuracy, have put them in a position where they don't compete well against other companies.

All this is a shame, as they used to be great. They still have some of the greatest kits out there, sadly, many of their recent releases are overpriced and some inexcusable innaccuracies (M106, Hawk, Lance, M48 series, etc.). And they don't seem too concerned about it.
VR, Russ



That's good to know, thanks.

So do you think newer DS should be more stable than older?
panzerbob01
Visit this Community
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 07:30 PM UTC
Russ:

Whether Dragon tells its sales-force or reps "we did" or "did not" ever change the DS formula is pretty much besides the point. Having "problems with some batches" has exactly the same outcome as doing an official change-in-formula, when it comes to chemistry. It creates chemical variation among batches. And chemical variation leads to variation in product performance.

And the "performance" of DS plastic is affected by interactions between samples of DS (track-sets, other DS parts) and their immediate surrounding chemical and physical conditions - their ENVIRONMENT. Temp, air-quality and composition, radiation, contact with other substances and materials - these compose the environment, and these affect how much and how fast the DS sample degrades and decomposes.

So what we modelers get from all of this is what amounts to a matrix of possible amounts of degradation over some period of time. Each kit provides a sample of DS. Some are surely pretty much "exactly" the same as some others (all came from some one batch) - these will all probably react about the same way to the same set of chemical and physical conditions - the "exact" same environment. Every OTHER batch is chemically DIFFERENT. And it will react DIFFERENTLY to some or all of those environmental conditions.

Because NOBODY actually KNOWS which exact batch with what exact actual formula they get in each kit, NOBODY has any way of actually EFFECTIVELY PREDICTING what will happen to their DS tracks! All you can do is GUESS and HOPE.

And NO, I wouldn't begin to buy that Dragon has actually IDENTIFIED exactly what the chemical problem(s) are, beyond finding that some batch(es) appear to have excess amounts of one ingredient or another. How could they do that? They can try to "clean up" their chemistry (meaning better QC and less variation in batches and between batches of DS), but even if they attained a "perfect" QC and all batches came out "exactly the same"... This still doesn't solve any problems for modelers! NOBODY KNOWS what actual combination of environmental factors will apply to every kit! (And rest assured, all kits are NOT handled "equally".)

IF everyone stored and handled their DS from these hypothetical "exactly the same" batches in "exactly" the same way (same air chem, same temp regimes, same air-pressure, same electro-magnetic radiation exposure, etc.), one could predict that "all" of those DS samples (track sets) would last equally long and degrade in the same way at the same rate. Right! GOOD LUCK with that!

It doesn't matter what Dragon says about its DS chemistry. People don't all handle their DS exactly the same way, and D's DS batches aren't actually all "exactly" the same... So what will happen with your sample of DS is pretty unpredictable. It MAY last a long time! Or it may melt down tomorrow. And that is what we are seeing across the many reports here and elsewhere concerning people's experiences with DS.

Cheers! Bob
brekinapez
Visit this Community
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 11:40 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The problem affects more than just tracks-- the Cybermodel line of ME109Es uses a DS plastic insert in the wheel wells...



I suffered an insert loss. One broke into 3 stiff chunks while the other stiffened some but held together.

I have a tank with 'sweaty bag' syndrome but the rest seem ok for now. Fortunately the bulk of my Dragon are old indy link releases or have MT.
jdelicce
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: September 02, 2017
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 7 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 24, 2019 - 10:37 AM UTC
I built a Dragon m-48a3 with DS tracks last summer and placed it on a glass shelf.
Upon reading about this problem, I checked all dragon kits that I have.
I found that when i lifted the M48, there was an oily residue left on the glass.
I wonder if the gun mantle covers will melt away too. Same stuff.
panzerbob01
Visit this Community
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 24, 2019 - 01:13 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I built a Dragon m-48a3 with DS tracks last summer and placed it on a glass shelf.
Upon reading about this problem, I checked all dragon kits that I have.
I found that when i lifted the M48, there was an oily residue left on the glass.
I wonder if the gun mantle covers will melt away too. Same stuff.



Only time will tell . IF you already have some possible break-down evidence after less than a year, your sample of DS may, sad to say, be headed south sooner then some others. Again, NOBODY KNOWS - NOBODY can actually say when and what will happen with any specific sample (kit and DS parts) being stored under any particular set of conditions.

My heart goes out to all who are seeing their builds decomposing. There's not a lot anyone can probably do to forestall or stop the decay. Perhaps, if you can remove and replace the suspect part(s) before they turn into goo or otherwise blow apart, you may be able to save the rest of the build.

Bob
LSY_42
Visit this Community
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: February 19, 2017
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 4 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 24, 2019 - 05:06 PM UTC
I had a similar problem with DS tracks when I was working with dragon 1/72 2 years ago. The tracks that mostly likely to have problems are the M4A3 76mm gun as 3 sets of mine came off as sticky even before paint was applied to it. After black spray had been applied to it, the tracks are extremely sticky and colour would not stay. I have emailed dragon care with photos attached but no reply or action ever came from them. The ones that cracked even before I started on work on them are the fireflies all brand new mint in box.
I suggest those that have some problems with 1/72 DS should change to OKB resin tracks.
DS tracks are ok for the moment for german panzers and Japanese tanks with no signs of deterioration.
As for 1/35 dragon should stick back to the link and length tracks, magic tracks or buy the fruii metal tracks. I have since replaced all DS tracks with either AFV club, bronco, trumpeter or the kit/'s original link and length tracks.
brekinapez
Visit this Community
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 24, 2019 - 06:16 PM UTC
Bob,

It's no surprise to me that chemistry is likely to blame for this; I binned an old Italeri kit because the vinyl tires ate into two sprues under them. Really you see this in other plastic/vinyl products over time as well, as they all eventually break down. You can't be hard and flexible at the same time without paying a price.
RobinNilsson
Staff MemberTOS Moderator
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 24, 2019 - 09:58 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Bob,

It's no surprise to me that chemistry is likely to blame for this; I binned an old Italeri kit because the vinyl tires ate into two sprues under them. Really you see this in other plastic/vinyl products over time as well, as they all eventually break down. You can't be hard and flexible at the same time without paying a price.



Go hard
or
Go bust
/ Robin
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Monday, March 25, 2019 - 12:52 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Bob,

It's no surprise to me that chemistry is likely to blame for this; I binned an old Italeri kit because the vinyl tires ate into two sprues under them. Really you see this in other plastic/vinyl products over time as well, as they all eventually break down. You can't be hard and flexible at the same time without paying a price.



Go hard
or
Go bust
/ Robin



I was hoping that the complaining about the "DS Tracks" could be "put to bed", but I see that that is not going to happen.

FOUR WHOLE PAGES OF RAMBLING BELLY-ACHING!!!

If you guys have problems with "DS Tracks", FIX THE PROBLEMS BY BUYING SOME A/M TRACKS, FOR PETE'S SAKES!!!
sgtreef
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Posted: Monday, March 25, 2019 - 01:25 AM UTC
Bummer all, I have built a few kits with DS tracks a few Sherman's and an M1A2. All good so far,was there not a deal a few years back about having to apply a coat of acrylic flat to seal the DS material,same thing happened to their 1/6 scale stuff the tires melted to the rims, and getting a set of Resin replacement wheels cost more then the damn kit does. As their QC sucks A$$ big times, one never knows what one will get.Case in point latest factory Explosion, of a chemical plant
But back to 1/6 scale stuff the problem is in the Kubelwagan and Swimmwagen kits, lucky I caught the fix at 1/6 scale division and saved my Kublewagen tires with a coat of acrylic, Swimmwagen's are toast, So another QC issue. And glad I picked up that last kit for $24.99 and not $125.00.
Scarred
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Monday, March 25, 2019 - 02:17 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Bob,

It's no surprise to me that chemistry is likely to blame for this; I binned an old Italeri kit because the vinyl tires ate into two sprues under them. Really you see this in other plastic/vinyl products over time as well, as they all eventually break down. You can't be hard and flexible at the same time without paying a price.



Go hard
or
Go bust
/ Robin



I was hoping that the complaining about the "DS Tracks" could be "put to bed", but I see that that is not going to happen.

FOUR WHOLE PAGES OF RAMBLING BELLY-ACHING!!!

If you guys have problems with "DS Tracks", FIX THE PROBLEMS BY BUYING SOME A/M TRACKS, FOR PETE'S SAKES!!!



That's not the solution. The problem is that Dragon knows there is a problem with DS, they should fix the problem, replace the parts or stop using DS in any of their kits. So if a DS non-track part, say a wheel, turns to crap where are you going to find a replacement wheel? Or as another posted the Dragon Apollo/Soyuz? Where are you going to find AM parts for that? Why should you have to fork over MORE money to replace a defective part when, as has been noted, Dragon knows there is an issue yet still foists this stuff on loyal customers?
Kevlar06
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Posted: Monday, March 25, 2019 - 02:51 AM UTC
Patrick,
Again, Dragon knows, but doesn't care. They also don't care much about kit accuracy in many of their newer kits. But they do care about their toy market and their high kit pricing. It's they reason I personally avoid Dragon kits. Folks can say what they want about them ignoring the wishes of their "customer base",but eventually their reputation and their competition will catch up to them. While Dennis is right about us all going on about this, the underlying anger shows there's more to the 4 pages of posts here than just DS tracks. It's easy to say "just replace it"-- but when you discover you have 4-5 kits you haven't even started in the 'stash with junk for parts, you start thinking about where your money went, --or will go in the future.
VR, Russ

P.S. The history of commercial marketing has shown that when stuff is not "built to last"--most successful manufacturers adjust or die. I think what we are seeing with Dragon is the slow marginalizing of their hobby market base, in favor of toys, which are generally more disposable than models. That's what they care about.