Would this kit work for a Modern weapons for OIF, and would you experts on OIF Recommened this kit for a M1A1HC's crew?
Here's the Web sit that I found it on.
http://www.granddadshobbyshop.com/DML03801.jpg
Hosted by Darren Baker
M-16 / AR-15 Family, by: Dragon Models Limite
Thrashergklm
Kentucky, United States
Joined: August 06, 2005
KitMaker: 179 posts
Armorama: 166 posts
Joined: August 06, 2005
KitMaker: 179 posts
Armorama: 166 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - 02:16 PM UTC
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - 04:52 PM UTC
Some of the weapons from it would work. The M16A2s and M16A2 Carbine (M4s, kinda, close enough) would work. The set also includes a bunch of obsolete weapons, not good for OIF, but fine for Vietnam timeframe, such as the M16A1, CAR 15, etc. The rest wer never really widely used.
I have also been told USMC tankers did not have any M4s during the initial invasion, so only the M16A2 would be correct.
I have also been told USMC tankers did not have any M4s during the initial invasion, so only the M16A2 would be correct.
Thrashergklm
Kentucky, United States
Joined: August 06, 2005
KitMaker: 179 posts
Armorama: 166 posts
Joined: August 06, 2005
KitMaker: 179 posts
Armorama: 166 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - 05:08 PM UTC
Gino
Thank you so very much for the advice, I can all ways count on your wisdom on such things.
Thank you so very much for the advice, I can all ways count on your wisdom on such things.
spooky6
Sri Lanka
Joined: May 05, 2005
KitMaker: 2,174 posts
Armorama: 582 posts
Joined: May 05, 2005
KitMaker: 2,174 posts
Armorama: 582 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 - 05:09 PM UTC
Don't the M-16A2s in that pic appear a bit stubby in comarison to to the A1? As far as I know the A2 is as long as the A1 (or even a cm or two longer). Looks more like a carbine in that pic
USArmy2534
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 29, 2005 - 04:11 AM UTC
The M16s in the set are pretty good. The flash suppressor is a little thick and the barrel, incredible thin (a good thing) is thus very fragile. But I agree, really only the M16, M4(ish), and M16/M203 (which is actually an M16A1 with M203) would work. For the A1/203, you'd need to do a little work to make is look like an A2.
Jeff
Jeff
Posted: Thursday, September 29, 2005 - 10:42 AM UTC
When I was there in March 2003 through July 2004 I saw several armor crews with assorted variations of AK-47's as well.
M1A2sep1CD
Texas, United States
Joined: August 01, 2005
KitMaker: 87 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: August 01, 2005
KitMaker: 87 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 29, 2005 - 11:44 AM UTC
the tankers carrying ak's and the pistol grip only version, i cant remember the real nae just an ak with no buttstock, are because if we take our weapons on the tank the get disgustingly dirty, and the armys .223/5.56 choice for them sucks in iraq, and the ak family is 7.62mm and shoots fast and accurate with a good operator, and they double as "plant me weapons"