_GOTOBOTTOM
Яusso-Soviэt Forum: WWII Soviet Armor
For discussions related to WW2 era Soviet armor.
Leningrad tanks
harrier1
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: June 09, 2005
KitMaker: 613 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 04, 2007 - 10:05 PM UTC
Hi
I have just been watching a history video (from the world at war series) about Leningrad and the narrator said that some of teh tanks made during the siege went to the frontline in bare steel without being painted. Is this true and are there any photos to prove it. Cheers. Nick
Johnston_RCR
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: April 01, 2006
KitMaker: 470 posts
Armorama: 367 posts
Posted: Monday, February 05, 2007 - 09:09 AM UTC
Not sure about that one, but another good story is the Stalingrad tanks. Some rolled out of the factory, basically right into battle. As the factories were threatened, some were actually rolled out without gunsights for the main gun. The gunner actually looked through the barrel to line up his target. It was done to save time, and get more tanks in to support operations.
SGTJKJ
#041
Visit this Community
Kobenhavn, Denmark
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 10,069 posts
Armorama: 4,677 posts
Posted: Monday, February 05, 2007 - 12:55 PM UTC
Well, I am not sure about the Leningrad myth(?) of tanks in bare metal. I have never seen any proff of this, but it could have happened.

Regarding the the fighting in Stalingrad it would seem to be at least partly true. I have seen one picture of a T-34 in Stalingrad that seems to be without any paint on the turret at all. Probably a rebuild/repaired tank. However, the turret is not a clear polished steel colour, but a more dark metallic brown/grey. I tried to think where I have seen the picture, but cannot remember.

Hope this helps a bit......
harrier1
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: June 09, 2005
KitMaker: 613 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Monday, February 05, 2007 - 01:15 PM UTC
Hi Guys
Very interesting, thank for you help, does anyone else know anything about this? Nick :-)
Drader
Visit this Community
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Monday, February 05, 2007 - 01:54 PM UTC
My recollection of the Leningrad factory which remained operational during the seige, was that it was a remzavod, where tanks were rebuilt rather than assembled from the ground up. This is why the Red Army tanks around Leningrad included many older versions, which also sported applique armour and other additions. The Kirovsky tank works was evacuated to Chelyabinsk before the Germans tightened the net.

The STZ factory in Stalingrad was evacuated before the fighting got too close, IIRC.

David
AikinutNY
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Posted: Monday, February 05, 2007 - 09:54 PM UTC
I have the same for both battles and that the workers would crew the tank as they finished their work on their last tank. If they left without being painted the body, turret and such would have been a dull dark grey and not a shiny polished metal finish. Only where there was grinding done whould you see anything shiny and that would disappear quickly.

Bore sighting the gun to a moving target would have been impossible to hit anything. Now a stationary target would be easier at close ranges.

What were the other duties for the commander of the T-34 tank? Gunner or loader?
ericadeane
Visit this Community
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Monday, February 05, 2007 - 10:38 PM UTC
Adam Wilder did two masterpiece articles in AFV Modeller depicting one of these "naked" T-34s from the Stalingrad factory. You can download pdf of the articles from their website (for $2 or somethiing)

The line about the workers crewing the last ones off the line sounds great for the propagandists. I don't know if the master die maker would have been allowed to do that. And I thought the Stalingrad factory never shut down. i could be wrong there.
harrier1
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: June 09, 2005
KitMaker: 613 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Monday, February 05, 2007 - 11:32 PM UTC
So they were bare in Stalingrad then. Does anyone have any pictures of Adam Wilders 'naked' tanks?


Quoted Text

the workers would crew the tank


Sounds like the making of an interesting dio, alhough I will have to wait a bit as I have a lot of kits to get through from Christmas!! Nick
harrier1
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: June 09, 2005
KitMaker: 613 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Monday, February 05, 2007 - 11:47 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Does anyone have any pictures of Adam Wilders 'naked' tanks?




I have found some now on missing lynx


Nick
Drader
Visit this Community
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 - 01:59 PM UTC
The story about assembly workers crewing tanks sounds a little far-fetched, however, as part of training tank crews did spend time in factories as part of the process of familiarisation with their tank. So they might have driven it off the production line.

David
SGTJKJ
#041
Visit this Community
Kobenhavn, Denmark
Joined: July 20, 2006
KitMaker: 10,069 posts
Armorama: 4,677 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 - 03:23 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The story about assembly workers crewing tanks sounds a little far-fetched, however, as part of training tank crews did spend time in factories as part of the process of familiarisation with their tank. So they might have driven it off the production line.

David



I agree. I also heard the part about the tankers spending time in Tankograd with their tanks and then driving them on to the train and moving to the front.
I think I even have some pictures in books showing workers and tankers together when the tank is leaving the factory.
harrier1
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: June 09, 2005
KitMaker: 613 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 - 07:14 PM UTC
Hi Guys
Yeah I thought it sounded quite far fetched, although I know the workers were given rifles in Leningrad, do you think it would be acceptable to do a dio depicting workers driving the tanks out of the gates or not (obviously there would be a lot of artistic license) or would it be better to just have a tank crew?
Jesper would you be able to scan those pictures and pm them or add them to this thread. Cheers, Nick :-)
Drader
Visit this Community
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 - 07:35 PM UTC
Why not make it a female driver, if you're going for a worker? IIRC some women from the tank factories ended up driving tanks in action since they had more experience of driving tanks picked up during factory work than there was time for in normal army training.

David
harrier1
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: June 09, 2005
KitMaker: 613 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 02:43 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Why not make it a female driver,


This dio is really starting to develop!!!
Nick
 _GOTOTOP