135
Monday, December 14, 2015 - 09:36 PM UTC
Dragon Models has announced that they will be releasing an M60 Patton in 1/35th scale as a smart kit.
Dragon is going down an exciting avenue by offering its first M60 main battle tank (MBT) in its 1/35 scale range of modern fighting vehicle kits. The M60 family of tanks was to become the USA’s primary MBT during the Cold War after its introduction into military service in 1960. Fitted with a bore-evacuated 105mm M68 main gun, it was an improved successor to the incumbent M48, which boasted only a 90mm gun. The M60 series went on to serve for more than four decades with the USA, and it still remains operational with a number of foreign purchasers.

Powered by a 750hp Continental V12 air-cooled and twin-turbocharged engine, the M60’s range and fuel consumption were an improvement over the M48’s. More than 15,000 variants of the M60 were eventually manufactured.

The foundational M60 MBT bears a strong resemblance to the M48 tank. However, this 1/35 scale kit depicts all the key features of the M60 – it has a 105mm gun, wedge-shaped hull, three return rollers each side, and the kit portrays the newer tank’s road wheels. Although some early-production examples did not have the commander’s cupola, Dragon has supplied this important component. This kit is expertly researched and accurately engineered. The complex and rounded shapes of the turret and commander’s cupola are particularly well done, for example the upper hull is made of one piece thanks to slide molds, providing a suitable foundation for all the numerous details to be added. This M60 MBT is an exciting new kit from Dragon, and a welcome addition to the modern 1/35 series.Dragon is going down an exciting avenue by offering its first M60 main battle tank (MBT) in its 1/35 scale range of modern fighting vehicle kits. The M60 family of tanks was to become the USA’s primary MBT during the Cold War after its introduction into military service in 1960. Fitted with a bore-evacuated 105mm M68 main gun, it was an improved successor to the incumbent M48, which boasted only a 90mm gun. The M60 series went on to serve for more than four decades with the USA, and it still remains operational with a number of foreign purchasers.

Powered by a 750hp Continental V12 air-cooled and twin-turbocharged engine, the M60’s range and fuel consumption were an improvement over the M48’s. More than 15,000 variants of the M60 were eventually manufactured.

The foundational M60 MBT bears a strong resemblance to the M48 tank. However, this 1/35 scale kit depicts all the key features of the M60 – it has a 105mm gun, wedge-shaped hull, three return rollers each side, and the kit portrays the newer tank’s road wheels. Although some early-production examples did not have the commander’s cupola, Dragon has supplied this important component.
Click Star to Rate
5 readers have rated this story.
Get a daily email with links to all our latest news, reviews, and features.

Comments

I don't even know if that's supposed to be good or bad But the response is funny. ... Complacently complaining.... Complacently... But on a side note, another kit to save my money for! But... If I do that I'll have no money left to get any other models... Quite a dilemma hath been imposed upon my wallet.
DEC 16, 2015 - 02:41 AM
Is there really some magic circle of modellers which decides what manufacturers will produce? As opposed to the manufacturers deciding that themselves, of course. Even when model companies hire (I use the term advisedly, as I don't think any of them gets rich doing it) consultants to advise on projects, they don't always go along with what those consultants tell them, so it doesn't sound as though those individuals exercise any power. Just read some of Tom Cockle's posts on ML for evidence of that. I'm not sure why Kurt would hate the fact that you sent Meng some info and they acted on it, as it's somewhat unclear how he might be disadvantaged by that. Still, that's for him to say - I don't think it's appropriate for me to attribute thoughts to other individuals when they can express their own opinions. As noted above, we could do well to keep a sense of proportion here - this is not the most important thing in the world, particularly as everyone I know in this hobby is not exactly short of projects they could do if no more kits were ever released. And there is always scratchbuilding....
DEC 16, 2015 - 03:36 AM
My observation of the recent market developments lead me to suggest that a kind of "separation" among kit manufactures has proceeded along with a shift forward in the history timeline. On the one hand you have the "Establishment" like TAMIYA being pressured years back when DRAGON, the first major Chinese company emerged, in production numbers. The input of new design & production technologies enabling AM companies to take a "slice of cake" and expanding their own supplemental market segment. With the increasing growth of Chinas economy a whole new range of companies like MENG, TAKOM, TRUMPETER etc. went into the market, but with a different approach than the companies already established. Moving away from the WW2 theme and responding to a newer/ younger generation of modelers being much more familia with recent/current military events and everything that comes with it. The supply of print/visual media on post WW2 events has also significantly increased supporting the kits now being offered. Is anybody really interested in DRAGON lastest Panzer IV, V and VI's ? Or has their M1A1, the M48s and M103s caused more attention ? TRUMPETER is constantly expanding their range of modern Russian AFVs, MENG always good for a surprise .... and who stared all the WW1 stuff ? Now Tiger-Models is dropping all the modern French goodies on us ... and some models are offered by more than just one manufacturer like the Leo1s, Chieftain's or the M60s etc. I do believe that some manufactures do listen to their customers to some extend ... see Chieftain, M60 .... but also exploit new market segments like the M9 or the D9, AMX-13 and all the SCUD stuff .... concluding that a all new M113 will be out shortly. But to achieve the high expectations in detail now in demand .... just look what you guys did to DRAGONs poor M103 .... making producers to rely on the input of "consultants" (if you want) to reduce their risks of failing on the one hand and keeping the upper hand over their competitors at the same time. Depending on which project the influence of the "consultants" might appear more stronger than they actually is. So don't kid yourselves ... all these companies are only in for the money and all the sophisticated input either by "consultants" or "enthusiast" is just one useful and cheap vehicle/tool to lead the whole project to success.. For myself I don't need to bust my brain on how a good kit came together, hell I don't even care who is to credit or not .... I'm just happy to have to choose from all the variety picking "the" kit which suits me the best .... and I can't see why any company should "owe" us something ... it's just business. Cheers Christopher
DEC 16, 2015 - 06:49 AM
Some obvious questions: - Who should model companies listen to to insure that they don't lose money? The 322 people in the world who respond to their polls and surveys? The guys who post on websites or Facebook that "If someone came out with X, I'd buy ten of 'em!" but end up not buying any because "It's the wrong version", ""It has too many parts", "It doesn't have an interior", "It has band tracks", and "I hear Y is coming out with one - I'll wait for theirs." - Do you have any evidence that DML hasn't made money with their Tigers? Do you know for sure how Rye Field Models is doing with their Tigers? If these companies are making money off these kits, isn't that proof that they made the right decision and listened to the right folks? - If I'm not mistaken, neither of the other two kits you've mentioned has been released yet. What makes you so certain Meng and Takom won't lose their butt on them? Wishful thinking or financial data? What is this "circle"? Who belongs to it? If you respond to nothing else in this thread, please tell us more about this! I want to hear all the details: The power they wield, the companies that are under their sway, the kits that weren't made because The Circle gave them a thumbs down, everything! Please, spare no detail and don't be afraid to name names. This is bound to be good stuff and it's utterly fascinating. I presume you are directing this toward the people who said AFV Club "out-and-out screwed us" because they announced a kit and didn't release it. A question, if I may: Do The Powers That Be include the members of The Circle, or do you have to be in The Circle to become a Power? Hopefully the above meets your expectations. KL
DEC 16, 2015 - 06:53 AM
DEC 16, 2015 - 07:03 AM
Yes, sadly, that has been my experience. KL
DEC 16, 2015 - 07:08 AM
Now that's funny! Who has five separate consecutive posts in this thread alone!? Jim
DEC 16, 2015 - 09:01 AM
Now that's funny! Who has five separate consecutive posts in this thread alone!? Jim [/quote] Gotta get that post count up Jimbaloo. Only way to promotion in the Armorama Army Corps is by posting lots!
DEC 16, 2015 - 09:43 AM
What do you mean, "lately"? I'm quite tolerant of others' opinions. I am intolerant of those who cannot express their opinions sensibly because it affects the whole process of giving and seeking opinions, reviews, impressions, and whatnot regarding models. Do a little experiment Dennis: Think of the best kit you ever bought and built. Now think back, weren't there some things that were not perfect, or not accurate? Of course, every kit has them. But they were small and compared to everything else in the kit they didn't diminish the good experience. Now suppose that someone posted about that kit and listed the very imperfections you recognized and said "Look at all these problems! How can a company make mistakes like these? This kit is junk, garbage, and filth and anyone who buys it is an idiot!" Would you say to yourself, "Oh well, he's just expressing his opinion, and his opinion is as valid as mine, so it wouldn't be right to challenge him." That's what happened here. "Out-and-out screwed" has a meaning as a phrase. To the gang reading this site I'm sure they are thinking of a deliberate, malicious act by someone to take your money or deprive you of something. Is that really what AFV Club did? More importantly, if I read your original post, I have to wonder, if he goes that far off the wall about literally nothing, how can I put any value in the other stuff he writes? It doesn't seem he can tell black from white from gray, or at least, express the fact that he can tell. KL [/quote] Kurt- These are your impressions, and I HAVE read the remarks of others' thoughts in this thread, which don't necessarily agree with yours. Think whatever you like about whether any of my other posts may give someone pause to my knowledge and/or experience. I've NEVER called YOU on the carpet for ANYTHING whatsoever. My opinions are MINE, and you have no right to publicly pillory me because you don't agree with some things that I say. If you disagree with things that I've written here, just say so. But DON'T put words in my mouth that I've never uttered. I did say that AFV CLUB "out-and-out screwed us", referring to the M8 HMC that they sent into limbo. Quite a few US/Allied fans that I've conversed with, not necessarily on this site, shared my opinion. And it's just an OPINION, that's all. DRAGON did much the same thing when they never released the M3 Lee/Grant that they advertised for over a year as "Coming Soon..." Do you just enjoy ripping other modellers to shreds publicly when they express opinions that don't coincide with yours, or is there some other deep-seated thing that drives you to spout your kind of derisive and malicious talk? As far as trying your little "experiment" goes, I have REPEATEDLY written on this site that, "No matter how good a kit may be, there is always something that will need 'correcting', 'replacement', or 'scratch-building' as far as one's personal standards require..." Your inference that I'm imbalanced and can't be trusted is as unwarranted as it is unfair. But that's just your OPINION, and my guess is that you'll rebut what I've just written here with more of your pointed vitriol. Don't expect another answer from me. In future, I will just ignore you...
DEC 19, 2015 - 09:04 AM
THIS STORY HAS BEEN READ 10,271 TIMES.
ADVERTISEMENT

Photos
Click image to enlarge
  • move
  • move
  • move
Dragon Models ReviewsMORE
Panzer IV Ausf G. In-Box Review
by Cody K
Bergepanther mit Aufgesetztem Built Review
by Andrew Jerome
IJA Type 97 In-Box Review
by Russ Amott
M3 Halftrack Built Review
by Pete Becerra | of 2 ratings, 100% found this helpful
Sd.Kfz 251/1D Built Review
by Jesse
IDF Magach 3 w/ ERA In-Box Review
by Sebastian Schoof
StuG.III Ausf.F Built Review
by Matthew Lenton
M67A2 In-Box Review
by Federico Collada
King Tiger with Zimmerit 1/35t Built Review
by Karl Flavell
Sdkfz 250/4 mit zwilling MG34 In-Box Review
by Karl Flavell
M752 LANCE Missile Launcher In-Box Review
by Jon Arnold
Sd.Kfz 250/7 In-Box Review
by DJ Judge
T54E1 Build In-Box Review
by Shawn | of 1 ratings, 100% found this helpful
Vollkettenaufklärer 38(t) Built Review
by Talal Mashtoub
Jagdpanzer IV A-0 Built Review
by Adam Mann

ADVERTISEMENT