_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
To "red oxide" - or not to "red oxide"?
Kuno-Von-Dodenburg
Visit this Community
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: February 20, 2007
KitMaker: 1,453 posts
Armorama: 1,319 posts
Posted: Friday, November 28, 2008 - 09:03 PM UTC
The quotes below are from George Conaway, Gerald Owens and Herbert Ackermans posting in the "Panther F camo" thread:


Quoted Text

GEORGE: I too am building a Panther F with the same scenario. If you were to strive for "accuracy," I would not use red primer (something that's way overdone IMHO) and go with overall olivgrun.



Quoted Text

HERBERT: Rot Oxid is a definite no-no.



Quoted Text

GERALD: As for red primer, this was unlikely, as, from December 1944 on, all subcontractors were supposed to paint the parts Olivgrun before delivering them to the final assembly plants.



Quoted Text

GEORGE: At the risk of provoking howls of protest again, that's a much more attractive (and realistic!) idea than the usual red barrels, red hatches, one red wheel, etc.



Ooooh .... errrrrr - do I detect the beginnings of an Armorama anti-Rotoxid rebellion along the lines of the anti-chipping sentiments that have started to come to the fore here recently?

Is the worm turning? The pendulum swinging? Have all the guys (myself included) who've added Rotoxid hatches / roadwheels / turrets / superstructures / even complete hulls etc. to builds got it completely wrong?

This is an interesting debate perhaps worthy of a separate discussion, so I thought I'd start one.

- Steve
John_O
Visit this Community
Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Joined: November 23, 2007
KitMaker: 569 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Friday, November 28, 2008 - 09:14 PM UTC
Hi Steve,

Interesting thread you start.

Today I'll spray the basecoat on my first model since I left the hobby at the age of 15; an E-100 by Trumpeter. And although I don't want to violate history too much I'm still inclined to use red oxi primer in the following stages of the painting. I guess it all depends how true to history you want to stay, but with these prototypes there's already so much room for interpretation that I would give the following advice: do it the way YOU like it. That should be the focus of our hobby anyway right?

Cheers,

John
Plasticbattle
#003
Visit this Community
Donegal, Ireland
Joined: May 14, 2002
KitMaker: 9,763 posts
Armorama: 7,444 posts
Posted: Friday, November 28, 2008 - 09:36 PM UTC

Quoted Text

do I detect the beginnings of an Armorama anti-Rotoxid rebellion


or it might just be more to do with the time frame of the panther F and for when the order for olivgrun was given????
Kuno-Von-Dodenburg
Visit this Community
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: February 20, 2007
KitMaker: 1,453 posts
Armorama: 1,319 posts
Posted: Friday, November 28, 2008 - 09:40 PM UTC

Quoted Text

it might just be more to do with the time frame of the panther F and for when the order for olivgrun was given????



That's also possible of course, Frank.

Hopefully these guys will chime in with their thoughts on the matter.

- Steve
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 29, 2008 - 12:28 AM UTC
Well, regardless of when a tank was finished and in what colors, Rot Oxid just didn't feature on any finished vehicle.

The plants doing final assembly, like Henschel, DB, MAN, MIAGG, Demag, Krauss-Maffei, MNH and others, they spraypainted the vehicles with all components fitted.

Pictures, especially color pics, shows stacks and stock of smaller fittings in Rot Oxid in the assembly plants, but that is just that, stock.

The hulls and turrets were deliverd in Rot Oxid for only a small period of time, from mid september to december 1944. In that period, orders were given to apply the camouflage colors sparingly on the Rot Oxid, and that is in the view of several people including me, the same was what was ordered for Afrika Korps vehicles, when these were finished in 2/3 basecoat with the remaining UNCOVERED 1/3 to be filled in with the secondary camo color.

The consensus about the sparingly use of camo is that upon the delivered Rot Oxid hulls and turrets, after all components were fitted and the tank virtually complete, the paint would be applied in roughly 1/3 Dunkel Gelb, 1/3 RotBraun and 1/3 Oliv Grün. And that combined covers the whole vehicle.

And Rot Oxid gun barrels is really REALLY completely wrong, as these were supplied by Krupp and such in black lacquer.
Tankleader
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 29, 2003
KitMaker: 718 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 29, 2008 - 12:35 AM UTC
Interesting thread here, since I've been guilty of both using and not using red oxide... Now how about seeing some photographic evidence that backs up either claim?

Tanks
Andy
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 29, 2008 - 12:59 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Interesting thread here, since I've been guilty of both using and not using red oxide... Now how about seeing some photographic evidence that backs up either claim?

Tanks
Andy



Very difficult, even color photographs cannot be trusted 100%. Black and white is virtually impossible to accurately determine what is what color.

That makes things rather difficult to get a definitve answer.

So, we have to take into consideration the used techniques and processes during production.
Jupiterblitz
Joined: December 30, 2007
KitMaker: 885 posts
Armorama: 796 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 29, 2008 - 02:10 AM UTC
As I am also interested in this question I wrote a mail to the Patton Museum in Fort Knox which has been answered today as follow:

"Sir:

When our Panther tank arrived at the Museum in the late 1940s it was painted just as you say. It was repainted in the 1970s and the original paint scheme was lost. I have attached one of the few color photographs that exist of the original camouflage (taken in the early 1960s) The stenciling on the front slope was applied in Germany and is the original US shipping markings. I hope that this is of some use.

Charles Lemons
Curator, Patton Museum"


Many thanks to Mister Charles Lemons!

And here is the photo he sent me

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" TARGET="_blank">Panther


(That was the question I asked: "Dear Sirs,

most probably you have been asked this question very often:

Were red oxid primer (RAL 8013) applied/used as some kind of camo scheme on German Panther tanks?

I have read that you (have) exhibit(ed) a Panther with green stripes on red oxid (the so called "Stachus Panther").

Any kind of response is very appreciated.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards

Marco Sari"
)
Damraska
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: October 06, 2006
KitMaker: 580 posts
Armorama: 499 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 29, 2008 - 08:01 AM UTC
Herbert accurately sums up current thinking on the red oxide primer question. I believe Jentz and Doyle still contend red oxide was used as a camouflage color in some instances (not on barrels). I also believe the contention rests on a single order that can reasonably be interpreted either way. I personally agree with the "no primer left showing" interpretation of that order, in part because no definitive picture exists proving otherwise. However, there ARE pictures that hint at the possibility of primer camouflage and an intelligent argument can be made for it.


Quoted Text

As I am also interested in this question I wrote a mail to the Patton Museum in Fort Knox who has been answered today as follow:



The photograph from the Patton Museum is very interesting and extremely frustrating at the same time. In my opinion, the right front road wheel is the only thing on the tank that looks even close to olive green. The inner road wheels may be dark yellow. The rest of the tank is a mess for interpreting colors. The Panzer in the background looks equally bad. The photograph was taken at least 15 years after the war so the paint may have worn off, chemically reacted with the undercoat, or differentially faded--probably all three.

Now for the kicker--SHOULD you paint your Panther red oxide? Over the last three years I have invested quite a bit of money in books on armored vehicles, especially those used by Germany in WWII. I have spent countless hours exploring the archives of Missing Lynx and other sites looking for answers to questions like this one. Did the Germans use red oxide primer as camouflage in WWII? Very probably not. But even knowing that I built a Panther with red oxide camouflage because it looks cool and the possibility is interesting and worth representation in my model collection. If you feel the same way, go for it! On the other hand, if you are driven to pursue the most accurate interpretation possible, do not use it! Do what is right for YOU.

-Doug
404NotFound
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Joined: March 08, 2007
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Monday, December 01, 2008 - 10:14 AM UTC
If we go with the notion that red oxide primer was not used as part of camo painting, where does that leave the famous photo of the IR Panther in the ambush scheme? What then is the overall dark base color? Olivgrun? Rotbraun? Any thoughts?

I wonder about this especially after seeing the color photos of a retrieved Panther schurzen on another forum that appears to be a base of Rotbraun with Dunkelgelb and Olivgrun sprayed over it.

All that said, I am in agreement that the notion of red oxide components or paint schemes is very likely inaccurate (as much as I might wish otherwise). That said, it seems a contentious and emotional topic for some with no small amount of "You can't prove it didn't happen, so that proves it did happen" sort of "logic" surrounding it. [ducking] Me, I'm merely interested in getting at the truth, no matter what it might be.
bill_c
Staff MemberCampaigns Administrator
MODEL SHIPWRIGHTS
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Monday, December 01, 2008 - 11:59 AM UTC
At the risk of provoking wrath, let me use a term that I employ on the Civil War side of material culture questions: is it PEC (plain, everyday, common).

I can appreciate those who like the unusual, and it might be fun to have a tank with Rot Oxid primer as part of its camo scheme. But THOUSANDS of vehicles were shipped painted, and Herbert has pretty exhaustively (to my mind) shown how the Germans were painting everything right up to the end. No jokes about anal-retentive Krauts, either, their practices are evident even in the intricate design work of their components.

So my thinking is, until someone turns up a color photo with unmistakable red oxide camo (as opposed to one taken 15 years later of a vehicle that maybe sat out in the elements and is rusted), or a reference in a period diary ("our Tiger B arrived today and they didn't have enough paint to finish the camoflage, it's part red oxide"), we should stop speculating and trying to find a needle in a haystack.
404NotFound
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Joined: March 08, 2007
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 05:28 AM UTC
No one has any thoughts about the coloring of this IR Panther?

IR Panther

Not the best quality jpeg, but one can still see the uniform dark color finish/base coat on the wheels.
bill_c
Staff MemberCampaigns Administrator
MODEL SHIPWRIGHTS
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 06:40 AM UTC

Quoted Text

... one can still see the uniform dark color finish/base coat on the wheels.


Ummm, are we sure that's not oil or mud or some other discoloration?
404NotFound
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Joined: March 08, 2007
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 06:52 AM UTC
I'm sure. In better high-res photos, it's extremely clear that it's a single dark color. Check the cover and page 186 of Panzertracts 5-3.
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 11:09 AM UTC

Quoted Text

If we go with the notion that red oxide primer was not used as part of camo painting, where does that leave the famous photo of the IR Panther in the ambush scheme? What then is the overall dark base color? Olivgrun? Rotbraun? Any thoughts?

I wonder about this especially after seeing the color photos of a retrieved Panther schurzen on another forum that appears to be a base of Rotbraun with Dunkelgelb and Olivgrun sprayed over it.

All that said, I am in agreement that the notion of red oxide components or paint schemes is very likely inaccurate (as much as I might wish otherwise). That said, it seems a contentious and emotional topic for some with no small amount of "You can't prove it didn't happen, so that proves it did happen" sort of "logic" surrounding it. [ducking] Me, I'm merely interested in getting at the truth, no matter what it might be.



You mean this one?



According to the orders given at the time this particular vehicle was completed, around 13 september 1944, coincides with the date for the order in which assembly plants were ordered to start applying the paint sparingly on the Rot Oxid primer.

Now, looking at this Panther, it to me shows only 3 camouflage colors, not 4.

Another nice candidate for this timestamp is the Fgst. Nr. 121052, completed around 22 september 1944, which is one of the Panther Ausf. G with steel wheels, this one is photographed with one side without and the other side with the Schürzen mounted.

On that picture of the right side, the second and third Schürzen appear to incorrectly mounted as they seem to belong to the LEFT side.

The way Schürzen are mounted on a Panther Ausf. G is that the trailing edge of the prior Schürze is placed OVER the leading edge of the next one.

These 2 Schürzen show a definite Dunkel Gelb demarkation on their trailing edge, the width of it exactly matching the overlap from a Schürze mounted with the trailing edge OVER the leading edge.

Now, what does this say? That this particular Panther-G, completed around 22 September 1944 was first basecoated in Dunkel Gelb, after which 2 camo colors were sprayed.

The lightest color on this Panther shows in the demarkated area on these 2 Schürzen, not a darker color which Rot Oxid would undeniable show up as on a B/W picture.

This to me, in my humble opinion, clearly disproves the "leaving Rot Oxid exposed after camouflage added" idea.
CMOT
Staff MemberEditor-in-Chief
ARMORAMA
Visit this Community
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 14, 2006
KitMaker: 10,954 posts
Armorama: 8,571 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 01:41 PM UTC
Herbert you I suspect have looked over more pics than most, have you ever come across a completed German WW2 AFV showing anything that could be the red oxide layer. I ask not to be a pain, but because nothing seems definate when it comes to German AFV's. Or failing that do you believe it could have occured in some of those very last vehicles to rumble off the factory floor.
taylgr
Visit this Community
Australia
Joined: March 15, 2008
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 127 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 02:52 PM UTC

Quoted Text

As I am also interested in this question I wrote a mail to the Patton Museum in Fort Knox which has been answered today as follow:

"Sir:

When our Panther tank arrived at the Museum in the late 1940s it was painted just as you say. It was repainted in the 1970s and the original paint scheme was lost. I have attached one of the few color photographs that exist of the original camouflage (taken in the early 1960s) The stenciling on the front slope was applied in Germany and is the original US shipping markings. I hope that this is of some use.

Charles Lemons
Curator, Patton Museum"


Many thanks to Mister Charles Lemons!

And here is the photo he sent me


(That was the question I asked: "Dear Sirs,

most probably you have been asked this question very often:

Were red oxid primer (RAL 8013) applied/used as some kind of camo scheme on German Panther tanks?

I have read that you (have) exhibit(ed) a Panther with green stripes on red oxid (the so called "Stachus Panther").

Any kind of response is very appreciated.

Thank you in advance.

Best regards

Marco Sari"
)



Great photo Marco, and good on you for making the effort to contact the museum

This all seems a bit of a "beat up" to me - we've got Jentz telling us that camo colours were to be added "sparingly" over the red oxide on tigerII's from Sept '44



and Marco's response from The Patton Museum that tells us that the pictured chassis was in fact red primer and green, and whilst I always harboured some doubts - Marco's picture certainly does help me make sense of this '45 pic from Munich



I reckon that this gives some creedence to the idea that there was a fair chance that primer was used (at least for a while) as part of the camo finish on at least some chassis'

Greg


Clarification:
"This posting contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available to the members of this forum for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.

I believe this is not an infringement of copyright and constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law."
CB1000h
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: March 01, 2006
KitMaker: 358 posts
Armorama: 304 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 03:29 PM UTC
Gentlemen
I like to look at it this way. Our hobby is an art some of that is based on factual evidence and some on artistic interpitation and some on just plain creativity.
I have seen some outstanding works on this site as well as at shows where and odd road wheel, fender or barrel is shown in primer and also primer in the camo scheme and they are just that outstanding works of art
We all like to be as acurate as possible but lets face it life is short and we should build what we think looks interseting as well as acurate, is going to be a mix.
Who knows what some bleary eyed over worked, under paid, factory worker let roll out of the factory on any given day and the shame of it all, no one took a photo, darnn! nobody will ever know
"Smile for the birdy Hanns, oh and did you forget to paint the toilet paper holders green again"
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 11:33 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Gentlemen
I like to look at it this way. Our hobby is an art some of that is based on factual evidence and some on artistic interpitation and some on just plain creativity.
I have seen some outstanding works on this site as well as at shows where and odd road wheel, fender or barrel is shown in primer and also primer in the camo scheme and they are just that outstanding works of art
We all like to be as acurate as possible but lets face it life is short and we should build what we think looks interseting as well as acurate, is going to be a mix.
Who knows what some bleary eyed over worked, under paid, factory worker let roll out of the factory on any given day and the shame of it all, no one took a photo, darnn! nobody will ever know
"Smile for the birdy Hanns, oh and did you forget to paint the toilet paper holders green again"



Well, perhaps that is one way to approach it, but my very personal belief is, that it greatly undermines the basis of what our hobby is about.

When one does no longer care about being accurate, one does no longer care to put the effort into a model, and one will always take the easiest road.

Therefore, just doing what one likes, will quickly erode this great hobby into one where the most stupid of stupid ideas must be heralded as great work, only on basis of the techniques used.

A superbly finised pink painted Sherman? A Panther with a Tiger-B turret? Oow why bother with understanding anything than?

It is my opinion in this, taking the easy option, is what will bring this hobby down.

Kit manufacturers have catered us with improving accuracy and offering more and more options, details and what would we do? Spit them in the face and screw up their costly researched product by "just doing what we like".

I REJECT THAT!

Model kit building is making a miniature representation of what was, is or will be. And I personally will not ever take the easier road when I know it isn't accurate. PERIOD.

Is that a harsh stand? Yes, because I am getting sick and tired of seeing models being drooled over ONLY because the techniques used are great, and accuracy is getting less and less attention these days.

And that applies to either putting the wrong things on kits in parts not used on such a vehicle, and excessive weathering as if the tank was dragged through a swamp, or sandblasted or left out to burn.
Jupiterblitz
Joined: December 30, 2007
KitMaker: 885 posts
Armorama: 796 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 12:03 AM UTC


I am really excited who takes your bait...
jimbrae
Visit this Community
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 01:32 AM UTC
At the danger of getting shot at by those whose library and knowledge is (much) greater than my own, here are a couple of personal observations.

IMO, chipping on German vehicles (certainly those such as those which were German produced - Panthers, Tigers etc.) is pretty suspect due to the fact that Red-Oxide was more than just a base color, it was in fact a sealant to protect from corrosion etc. It was, as I understand it, pretty sophisticated material. As to chipping on AFVs such as 'Beute-Panzers' it MAY be more appropriate - unless those were taken-in, sand blasted and primed like 'Home-Produced' vehicles. I've got my doubts about that scenario suspecting that they would be re-painted at Divisional level - in-theater.

I have never, seen much conclusive evidence of chipping - neither on German or Allied vehicles. Nor am I convinced that to 'be scale' its necessary to reproduce the painting process an actual vehicle went thru. It is, IMO, self-defeating although with a red-oxide base, you MIGHT get a better color depth on Dunkelgelb?

Great thread and yes, my personal 'Jury' is still very much out....
CB1000h
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: March 01, 2006
KitMaker: 358 posts
Armorama: 304 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 01:43 AM UTC
"I am really excited who takes your bait..."




Like a shark in bloody waters
Cue theme music
Well I didnt quite say we sould just go willy nilly now did I. I believe I said it was a mix, a well proportioned balance of several diciplines to achive a work of art.
PLease even the manufactures dont have a perfect model, yet people still build them out of the box with some very stunning effect. Not everyone wants to spend the entire life tring to determine whether the jack placement on a perticuler Tiger I vehicle was horizontal or verticle. Why would you want to over research that. Dont get me wrong if the facts are readilly avialable then I think one should attempt to the best of thier ability to try to be acurate, but like someone posted above, if someone has a time dated diary or something of the sorts then no one is apsolutly positivly correct unless you were there. "Where you"
Of corse if you have nothing better to do in life than ponder over some minute aspect of your model than go ahead no one in this thread is telling you not to.
I would use some of my time here on earth time to smell the roses as well as build some build models that are fairly acurate again ist all about the balance.. I dont know about you other old farts but I am still young enough to get off my butt before it becomes molded in the shape of my chair. Just build them oh and try to encourage some young people to get into this hobbie. The shows are starting to look like bingo night at the old folks home

Yumm Yumm that was tasty
404NotFound
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Joined: March 08, 2007
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 01:49 AM UTC
Invariably, in these types of threads, sooner or later the "Who cares?" or "It's your model," or "I don't concern myself with such details" or "This is all interpretative art," or my favorite, "You can't prove it didn't happen, so that proves it did" etc. type comments are made.

But the topic here is that a serious discussion is being undertaken concerning the use of certain schemes and colors. The topic is not whether or not the discussion itself is merited or should even be broached.

So we already know that there are you guys that have a freer approach to issues of research, historical accuracy and so on. We know that some view this as useless pedantry. We understand that. That's why I'm hoping that this thread won't be steered into the usual rough terrain that we seen these threads head for in the past.

Now getting back to the topic at hand: I'd like to hear thoughts about the single base coat color used on the wheels of the IR Panther shown above. It's quite dark and as many of us know, is depicted as red oxide primer in Jentz' and Doyle's Osprey Panther Variants book.

Of course, Jentz also conveniently has backed away and disavowed color plates in his books in the past as "figments of someone's imagination" and with no explanation as to how such "figments" got into his books, who advised the artists to interpret photos in such a manner and so on. So when someone such as this refutes his own work, we're left with a bit of a mystery.
CB1000h
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: March 01, 2006
KitMaker: 358 posts
Armorama: 304 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 02:13 AM UTC
It is always good to have a diplomat amoung us
You are correct I was off topic sorry for the rant everyone
Can I ask? Is there a real answer to this question being discussed or just opinions (which are fine)
I am presently building Dragons late Tiger I (great kit) and was actually thinking of using the red oxide in areas of the paint scheme as missed matched parts added to repair damaged parts but not paited in camo colors. So would that be ok to do ir reguards to this discussion?
John_O
Visit this Community
Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Joined: November 23, 2007
KitMaker: 569 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 02:38 AM UTC
An appeal to those fortunate enough to posess the specialized literature on the German vehicles and their production details: What about collecting the appropriate quotes concerning this topic in a single document? That way the information doesn't get spread out over a zillion posts in between discussions about the relevancy of the topic? And it could serve to answer future questions about the same topic... And instigate more discussion probably.

Just an idea....

J
 _GOTOTOP