_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
The Cnadian LAV III build - Complete
bison126
Visit this Community
Correze, France
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Posted: Monday, June 11, 2007 - 07:41 AM UTC
OK Charles I can't see what to add to all the above laudatory (and deserved) comments.
I got one question about the way you did the license plate. It is looking darn real !!

Olivier
ti
Visit this Community
Dalarnas, Sweden
Joined: May 08, 2002
KitMaker: 2,264 posts
Armorama: 1,763 posts
Posted: Monday, June 11, 2007 - 08:02 AM UTC
More LAV III pics. Thanks Jim

Olivier, the license plate is from Archer transfer. I rubbed it on a piece of styrene and then cut around the edges carefully and then weathered it after I glued it on the back hull. That's it Hope it helps.
MARPAT
Visit this Community
Northern Territory, Australia
Joined: April 14, 2007
KitMaker: 206 posts
Armorama: 39 posts
Posted: Monday, June 11, 2007 - 12:03 PM UTC
I really like nicely done! Good job Weathering. Please post more pictures. I really like the License Plate by the by.
ti
Visit this Community
Dalarnas, Sweden
Joined: May 08, 2002
KitMaker: 2,264 posts
Armorama: 1,763 posts
Posted: Monday, June 11, 2007 - 10:30 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I really like nicely done! Good job Weathering. Please post more pictures. I really like the License Plate by the by.



Glad you like it. You said you would like to see more pics. More pics of the model I suppose. Just the whole thing, all sides???
HKCW
Visit this Community
Hong Kong S.A.R. / 繁體
Joined: October 23, 2005
KitMaker: 17 posts
Armorama: 14 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 - 03:46 AM UTC
Very well done on the LAV III.

I belive 'Voyager' from China have the German type smoke dischargers made in barss with resin mounts.

Give me your address and I will try to send you a send to compliment your outstanding LAV III.

Alan
junglejim
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: February 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,728 posts
Armorama: 1,629 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 - 07:24 AM UTC
Hello Alan!
Nice to see you post here. Can you e-mail me at [email protected] , I seem to have lost your e-mail address.

Jim
jasondiggs
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: December 13, 2004
KitMaker: 120 posts
Armorama: 108 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 09:23 AM UTC
Thanks for the clarification Jim. One question. Why then would you need the extra armor put on for those lavs that end up in Afganistan, for instance and none for other countries? Isn't it better to put armor on all? or is this to save money.
LeoCmdr
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 09:48 AM UTC
The add-on armour is applied based on the possible enemy threat assessment and mission to be conducted.

The add-on armour was attached to the Canadian LAV IIIs in both Afghanistan and Bosnia but not the UN mission in Eritrea.

The LAV IIIs in Afghanistan are involved in combat so the need for maximum armour. No need to attach it for training in Canada.
jasondiggs
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: December 13, 2004
KitMaker: 120 posts
Armorama: 108 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 10:42 AM UTC
Okay, thanks Jason.
It seems both the trumpeter kit and AFV club do not have this extra armor, right?
junglejim
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: February 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,728 posts
Armorama: 1,629 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 02:28 PM UTC
No, it's molded on both. Here's a pic of the AFV-Club lower hull showing the plates of applique armour. The unarmoured/plain ones just have threaded mounting lugs, no obviuos plates.


Jim
jasondiggs
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: December 13, 2004
KitMaker: 120 posts
Armorama: 108 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 02:39 PM UTC
Alright, I'm confused now. Jason just told charles that the lav he built could not be one that was active in Afganistan because charles model did not have the add-on armor. If the trumpeter kit does have it then why did he say it didn't? Or is he referring to something completely different? Just trying to understand this thing a little better. Thanks again.
LeoCmdr
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 03:15 PM UTC
I'll clarify....as posted in Jim's comparison images of the real vehicles....there is no add-on armour added to the turret of Charles' LAV III...it is on the hull.

So, it's kind of a hybrid in that the add-on armour is on the hull but not the turret. I don't think this would used operationally...it would be all or nothing.
ti
Visit this Community
Dalarnas, Sweden
Joined: May 08, 2002
KitMaker: 2,264 posts
Armorama: 1,763 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 10:19 PM UTC
Hey Jason, you're right. Thanks. I should have added the extra armor to the turret. At the time I did not think it was a significant part of the build. Now I do, if I wanted a proper representatin of a Afgan vehicle. I was careless but it seems to be a good lesson for those in the process of building a LAV III at the moment

As always Jason, your knowledge has played a vital role in my build and I very much appreciate it. I now know much more now than when I started on the build. Thanks again. I'll be seeking your help on my furure Canadian build. So don't stray too far...
strathcona
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2007
KitMaker: 30 posts
Armorama: 27 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 - 11:13 PM UTC
Hooah, Charles!
Great build , it really does capture the look of this vehicle! Alot of hard work , but it was well worth it ! I like the empty water bottle , on the antenna, we put types of glow sticks , in the there, it helps prevent " friendly fire " incidents .
Frank
jasondiggs
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: December 13, 2004
KitMaker: 120 posts
Armorama: 108 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 14, 2007 - 05:31 AM UTC
Thank you Jason. I got it now.
Lagumiles
Joined: December 30, 2003
KitMaker: 156 posts
Armorama: 135 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 01:33 AM UTC
Great job anyway but there is another point that it scares me, I have a doubt about the upper hull I try to explain with pictures.



There is a step on the side just behind the exhaust tube grill that should not be there in my opinion.
Then the hull sides results too high, but I could be wrong.
Regards
Moreno
 _GOTOTOP