Yes, the M706 would be something I would consider as part of the group.

Tony

Tony;I dont like the idea of pushing people out of a build but come on it says Stryker LAV not armoured cars?
whats up with that. M20's and M706's are not a Stryker or LAV, so that is a nobrainer question. There has aready been an Armoured car build. Lets keep the Campaign true

Quoted Text

---

Tony;I dont like the idea of pushing people out of a build but come on it says Stryker LAV not armoured cars?
whats up with that. M20's and M706's are not a Stryker or LAV, so that is a nobrainer question. There has aready been an Armoured car build. Lets keep the Campaign true

---

Tony,
Being that I am the 1 that requested to do a M-20 I will have to disagree here. The M-20 armor ranged from 3 mm on the hull floor, to 19 mm on the front hull and turret. This sounds like a light armored vehicle to me granted it is not a troop carrier like the Striker.
I don't know what Todd's theory of a LAV is, maybe a GMC 6X6 with armored plates welded to the sides. As far as the suggested that Armored Cars had a campaign, well some of us newer members were not around for that.
So since the campaign is not official yet and there are not a whole bunch of guy committed to this type build I would leave it as originally stated " Strikers and Light Armored Vehicles" give people more options then just Strikers.
Additionally if the 6 wheel of the M-20 are not enough I have a 8RadSd.Kfz232.
Just my opinion.

Sal;
I dont think you could confuse the word Stryker, theres is no acronym. But the Campaign was for Stryker & LAV.
Not the acronym LAV which stands for Lightly Armored Vehicle.
But Proper Noun LAV as in ASLAV, LAV-25, LAV-AD,LAV C2,LAV-AT,Recovery LAV.
I wasn't disputing what are and what aren't Lightly armored vehicles.

Everyone that has refered to the Word LAV so far has chosen a Type model of the LAV family, not an Lightly Armored Vehicle.

Hey folks,

Just to clarify, is the Mowag Pirahana is acceptable? There are no Mowag Pirahana kits on the market but seeing as the Stryker family originated from it, I'm assuming it's okay?

Eoin

Hi Todd,

I agree with you. Now exist many version LAV/Stryker family and also LAV-25, ASLAV and CDN Coyote /BIson family from many producer.
I think that this is interested Campaign.

Miloslav

The term LAV has a loaded meaning, especially when paired with Stryker. I think if you want to include the M20 and M706, it would be best to rename the campaign to something like Armored Cars or Armored Wheeled Vehicles.

That's a good suggestion, Gary. I like the title "Armored Wheeled Vehicles". I think that more accurately describes what I had in mind. Hopefully, the LAV and Stryker participants will stay with the campaign.

Would the USMC LAV-R Light Armored Vehicle Recovery by Trumpeter, Kit # 00370 fill the bill? I just picked it up on clearence and would love to use it for the campaign.

Quoted Text

---

Would the USMC LAV-R Light Armored Vehicle Recovery by Trumpeter, Kit # 00370 fill the bill? I just picked it up on clearence and would love to use it for the campaign.

---

Mike:
Well it appears now that with the Campaign name change it doesn't matter. Either way the LAV-R is allowed. It is an LAV type & an Armored Wheeled Vehicle. So your in like FLINT dude.