Hosted by Darren Baker
Pascal's M2A3 Bradley (Meng 1/35)
pascalbausset
Moselle, France
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 11:45 PM UTC
I just receive the brand new M2A3 Bradley w/Busk3 kit; Here the huge card box on my printer.
The armor ERA in complete or semi suite :
Tracks are very nice, easy to assemble and perfect. Comparison with real things :
Gingersdad
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 31, 2014
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Joined: January 31, 2014
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 12:08 AM UTC
Great!!! Let's see more!
panamadan
Minnesota, United States
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 1,513 posts
Armorama: 1,449 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 1,513 posts
Armorama: 1,449 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 02:45 AM UTC
I'm looking forward to seeing this built.
Rock on Garth.
Dan
Rock on Garth.
Dan
Recon
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: October 19, 2002
KitMaker: 1,571 posts
Armorama: 764 posts
Joined: October 19, 2002
KitMaker: 1,571 posts
Armorama: 764 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 03:16 AM UTC
I will be following this build closely. Waiting for mine to show up.
Mike
Mike
pascalbausset
Moselle, France
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 03:23 AM UTC
Thx
Running gear in place, suspension arms are movable:
Engine transmission and engine air intake system ready to install:
Now dry fit in the hull :
Running gear in place, suspension arms are movable:
Engine transmission and engine air intake system ready to install:
Now dry fit in the hull :
pilote14
Pas-de-Calais, France
Joined: November 01, 2010
KitMaker: 459 posts
Armorama: 432 posts
Joined: November 01, 2010
KitMaker: 459 posts
Armorama: 432 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 05:16 AM UTC
another fantastic building !
pascal tu es penible ! lol
pascal tu es penible ! lol
terminators
France
Joined: February 20, 2012
KitMaker: 1,932 posts
Armorama: 1,907 posts
Joined: February 20, 2012
KitMaker: 1,932 posts
Armorama: 1,907 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 05:18 AM UTC
Whow you have it ! This kit looks very nice.
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 05:27 AM UTC
Of course, first rate work as always... just one question though... when do you find time to sleep?
Will definitely follow this!
Hisham
Will definitely follow this!
Hisham
Maxymilian
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: March 21, 2009
KitMaker: 379 posts
Armorama: 299 posts
Joined: March 21, 2009
KitMaker: 379 posts
Armorama: 299 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 06:55 AM UTC
Just when you think no one can bring anything new to the hobby, Meng do it. I think that their models are game changers.
Very nice build so far. Makes me think to buy one.
Very nice build so far. Makes me think to buy one.
ejasonk
Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Joined: October 14, 2007
KitMaker: 314 posts
Armorama: 226 posts
Joined: October 14, 2007
KitMaker: 314 posts
Armorama: 226 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 08:35 AM UTC
How is the quality of plastic? I was a bit disappointed with the plastic in their T-90 kit, which was pretty soft in my taste.
pascalbausset
Moselle, France
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 09:51 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Of course, first rate work as always... just one question though... when do you find time to sleep?
Will definitely follow this!
Hisham
As I'am retired I have suffisant time for modeling sleeping and many other occupations
Thanks for your comments.
Plastic is the same as the one i've seen in all the Mengs kit (Merkavas, D9R), but this is not very important, due the high qualityy from this new kit.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 10:35 AM UTC
I can't wait to get mine. It looks great. Keep up the good work.
18Bravo
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 01:39 PM UTC
That's coming along nicely. The engine photos are going to help you quite a bit.
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 06:43 PM UTC
Another one, you guys are killing me! Keep up the great work, I'll be watching
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 - 07:05 PM UTC
Quick question, if I may, are there any other vehicles that use this same engine set up?
Hisham
Hisham
18Bravo
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 06:51 AM UTC
The Paladin PIM should use a nearly identical set up.
From what I have gathered, the one usually seen online is the prototype. There is what I call a later version that has the "D" shaped removable plate on the front left slope just like the Bradley does. I'm using the Meng engine for my PIM build that I started a little over a month ago.
The Meng engine/tranny set is a great starting point. In the Bradley the engine is very hard to see unless you remove the interior access panel next to the driver. The transmission itself just lacks a few small details the can be readily scratch built - control rods, springs, oil lines. Kudos to Meng for not casting them onto the casing. It's far easier to add them than it is to shave them off and then add them.
From what I have gathered, the one usually seen online is the prototype. There is what I call a later version that has the "D" shaped removable plate on the front left slope just like the Bradley does. I'm using the Meng engine for my PIM build that I started a little over a month ago.
The Meng engine/tranny set is a great starting point. In the Bradley the engine is very hard to see unless you remove the interior access panel next to the driver. The transmission itself just lacks a few small details the can be readily scratch built - control rods, springs, oil lines. Kudos to Meng for not casting them onto the casing. It's far easier to add them than it is to shave them off and then add them.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 07:32 AM UTC
The AAVP7A1 RAMS/RS version also uses the same engine and tranny. The radiator and intake setup is a little different, but they are the same basic parts.
pattesmaq
Haute-Alpes, France
Joined: June 27, 2012
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 80 posts
Joined: June 27, 2012
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 80 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 08:13 AM UTC
hello pascal
the model ist very nice
pat
the model ist very nice
pat
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 08:13 AM UTC
I will be following this build closely.
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 09:01 AM UTC
Nice start pascal, looking forward to seeing more
Jedge3
Michigan, United States
Joined: July 17, 2010
KitMaker: 258 posts
Armorama: 208 posts
Joined: July 17, 2010
KitMaker: 258 posts
Armorama: 208 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 09:03 AM UTC
Looks great. Really looking forward to getting this kit in the near future.
The_musings_of_NBNoG
Oregon, United States
Joined: January 08, 2012
KitMaker: 520 posts
Armorama: 516 posts
Joined: January 08, 2012
KitMaker: 520 posts
Armorama: 516 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 09:22 AM UTC
I made my self a promise not to buy another kit untill 1/2 of my $3K stash is built.........
this kit is severly testing my resolve.....
Please Post ALOT of Photos
.
...so I can vicariously enjoy it as well!
this kit is severly testing my resolve.....
Please Post ALOT of Photos
.
...so I can vicariously enjoy it as well!
pascalbausset
Moselle, France
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 04:28 PM UTC
Thanks all!
Some more work, and the hull for a test shot :
And nowt BUSK3 question.
Meng make a BUSK 3 version frm the M2A3., with 3 decorations and markings for 3 Bradley two OIF iRAQ 2005 and one Kuwait 2003. The kit need to be build with the low row of ERA tiles on side skirts.Like this :
But I can't see a pic from this version in Iraq. All the Bradley pics I have are without these tiles :
Some more work, and the hull for a test shot :
And nowt BUSK3 question.
Meng make a BUSK 3 version frm the M2A3., with 3 decorations and markings for 3 Bradley two OIF iRAQ 2005 and one Kuwait 2003. The kit need to be build with the low row of ERA tiles on side skirts.Like this :
But I can't see a pic from this version in Iraq. All the Bradley pics I have are without these tiles :
pascalbausset
Moselle, France
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 04:57 PM UTC
Another example :
18Bravo
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 01, 2014 - 05:07 PM UTC
It's coming along nicely.
I didn't have any input on the older markings, but I can tell you that for 2003 and 2005 the interior won't be correct. The seats are for the later variant. If you want to do a Bradley from those years you'll have to use the older seat arrangement. For 2007-8, use my photos and you can't go wrong.
I didn't have any input on the older markings, but I can tell you that for 2003 and 2005 the interior won't be correct. The seats are for the later variant. If you want to do a Bradley from those years you'll have to use the older seat arrangement. For 2007-8, use my photos and you can't go wrong.