Яusso-Soviэt Forum: Cold War Soviet Armor
For discussions related to cold war era Russo-Soviet armor.
For discussions related to cold war era Russo-Soviet armor.
Hosted by Jacques Duquette
Hard criticism on Trumpeter´s model kits
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 - 03:00 PM UTC
How are Trumpeter's wheeled BTR kits?
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 - 06:02 PM UTC
1. Kurt beat me to the punch. I looked through the two kits I have, the early and late D-30, and it is exactly as he said. The the "late" D-30 (kit 02329) is NOT meant to have the double baffle.
2. The Trumpeter BTR kits are VERY fun. I have already converted 2 BTR-70 early kits into 2S14's. VERY nice to work with, very well thought out, and have all the PE the kit really needs for the average builder.
2. The Trumpeter BTR kits are VERY fun. I have already converted 2 BTR-70 early kits into 2S14's. VERY nice to work with, very well thought out, and have all the PE the kit really needs for the average builder.
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 12, 2014 - 02:40 AM UTC
I didn't know Trumpeter made BTR-70 kits. I have 2 BTR-60 (early and late) and would consider any of the later versions if they were good.
Quoted Text
1. Kurt beat me to the punch. I looked through the two kits I have, the early and late D-30, and it is exactly as he said. The the "late" D-30 (kit 02329) is NOT meant to have the double baffle.
2. The Trumpeter BTR kits are VERY fun. I have already converted 2 BTR-70 early kits into 2S14's. VERY nice to work with, very well thought out, and have all the PE the kit really needs for the average builder.
hugohuertas
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Joined: January 26, 2007
KitMaker: 1,024 posts
Armorama: 1,013 posts
Joined: January 26, 2007
KitMaker: 1,024 posts
Armorama: 1,013 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 12, 2014 - 04:57 AM UTC
They do, both early and late versions, and now they've released -or are going to- the East German Army SPW-70 too.
manicmodeler
Canada
Joined: February 08, 2009
KitMaker: 82 posts
Armorama: 77 posts
Joined: February 08, 2009
KitMaker: 82 posts
Armorama: 77 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 12, 2014 - 05:32 AM UTC
My only hope is that Trumpeter would stop releasing the early and late version of the same model (Canadian grizzly and cougar) separately, I would prefer that they include both parts for the early and late version in one kit, and let the modeler decide which version is preferred.
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 12, 2014 - 11:54 AM UTC
Richard, sorry, but I doubt you will see your dream. Trumpeter is going to milk these molds like a monster. BUT...there is a great chance we will get ALL of the minor mods in the build lifetime of a particular series of vehicles.
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 12, 2014 - 11:55 AM UTC
And Yes, Trumpeter has released BTR-60, BTR-70, and BTR-80 kits. They are all very good.
Posted: Thursday, June 12, 2014 - 01:14 PM UTC
The best comment I've heard was "All models are wrong, some are useful." They were talking about finite element models, but I think it applies here. When I buy a kit, I ask what can I learn? Is there something to interest or teach my kids with this model? A cheap WWII B-17 early Revell 1/72 kit with the right markings can tell about the organization and aircraft's unit. The 1/32 scale HK B-17 model can help you plan out the full scale restoration of your actual warbird's radio room. What would YOU like to get out of YOUR model? I appreciate the ARMORAMA forum and the reviews to let me know what is available. I've enjoyed the Trumpeter modern offerings like the M1117 Guardian.
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 12, 2014 - 11:32 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The best comment I've heard was "All models are wrong, some are useful." They were talking about finite element models, but I think it applies here. When I buy a kit, I ask what can I learn? Is there something to interest or teach my kids with this model? A cheap WWII B-17 early Revell 1/72 kit with the right markings can tell about the organization and aircraft's unit. The 1/32 scale HK B-17 model can help you plan out the full scale restoration of your actual warbird's radio room. What would YOU like to get out of YOUR model? I appreciate the ARMORAMA forum and the reviews to let me know what is available. I've enjoyed the Trumpeter modern offerings like the M1117 Guardian.
The Guardian invariably getting high marks from reviewers.
SEDimmick
New Jersey, United States
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 02:13 AM UTC
Quoted Text
You identify yourself as "PatriotaModels", a company that offers conversions and corrections, right?
So what is the problem???....just cash in on Trumpeter's mistakes and sell some conversions and corrections!
I'll throw this one out there...slogging off on another manufactures product like has been done here sets a bad tone IMO.
For example, his company offers a T-72 Ural turret, well to put it nicely, isn't even as accurate as the Trumpeter D30 he is complaining about.
He IMO should be a bit more careful about calling out other manufactures issues, when his own products aren't even correct either....
Nokturnal
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: January 11, 2013
KitMaker: 65 posts
Armorama: 64 posts
Joined: January 11, 2013
KitMaker: 65 posts
Armorama: 64 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 02:50 AM UTC
Quoted Text
And Yes, Trumpeter has released BTR-60, BTR-70, and BTR-80 kits. They are all very good.
And BTR-40, and a BTR-50PK.
Anyone else get the feeling that the OP was trolling? He's not posted since the first post, and as others have noted he's got his own website/store to promote...
Perhaps this was a (not so clever) marketing technique to get more website hits?...Obviously if the content doesn't even match the quality of the company he is insulting then it's a bit foolish but it did get people talking and checking up on the guy..
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 04:22 AM UTC
So.....getting close to locking this thread up. Good discussion, but it seems to have run its course. Just don't want it popping up again with new comments in a year or two. I will give it another 24hrs.
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 07:27 AM UTC
Well I am going to weigh in with a brief reference to my comments elsewhere on Armorama regarding Trumpeter's Maz 537 offerings.
While the general shape and casting quality of the vehicle exterior is excellent, some of the basic details like the driveline (what IS actually included in the kit) defys all mechanical logic. Anyone who has even the most basic understanding of a four wheel drive vehicle will understand immediately that this part of the vehicle was simply made up out of thin air with little or no reference or study given by the designer of the model.
Reference regarding more detail on the above statement can be found at:
https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/218845&page=1
You say "if you don't like it , don't buy it.". Well if they were not the only ones offering this particular MAZ kit believe me I wouldn't be buying Trumpeter.
As it is I will put my modeler's hat on and correct the things I can't live with and will enjoy doing it, but truely I would rather spend this same time putting proper extra detail into a properly engineered model rather than waisting my time fixing totally gross errors made by the model manufacture.
While the general shape and casting quality of the vehicle exterior is excellent, some of the basic details like the driveline (what IS actually included in the kit) defys all mechanical logic. Anyone who has even the most basic understanding of a four wheel drive vehicle will understand immediately that this part of the vehicle was simply made up out of thin air with little or no reference or study given by the designer of the model.
Reference regarding more detail on the above statement can be found at:
https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/218845&page=1
You say "if you don't like it , don't buy it.". Well if they were not the only ones offering this particular MAZ kit believe me I wouldn't be buying Trumpeter.
As it is I will put my modeler's hat on and correct the things I can't live with and will enjoy doing it, but truely I would rather spend this same time putting proper extra detail into a properly engineered model rather than waisting my time fixing totally gross errors made by the model manufacture.
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 07:44 AM UTC
Quoted Text
So.....getting close to locking this thread up. Good discussion, but it seems to have run its course. Just don't want it popping up again with new comments in a year or two. I will give it another 24hrs.
Mr. Duquette
I fail to understand why you state that you will "lock down this discussion" in 24 hours. This has been a fair (though sometime a bit rude) discussion of one model maker's products both in their good points AND their failings. This is a topic which all serious modeler builders should be made aware of.
As such this thread is properly and correctly entitled and should stand as long as the Armorama website stands. If a particular manufacture/advertizer doesn't like what is said about them they should consider listening to our comments and improving their offerings.
After all, what do we know, "we're just the customer"?
Michael Koenig
ijozic
Joined: May 23, 2007
KitMaker: 109 posts
Armorama: 109 posts
KitMaker: 109 posts
Armorama: 109 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 09:07 AM UTC
Quoted Text
My only hope is that Trumpeter would stop releasing the early and late version of the same model (Canadian grizzly and cougar) separately, I would prefer that they include both parts for the early and late version in one kit, and let the modeler decide which version is preferred.
I don't really understand your problem. This way the modeller can choose as well - he just buys whichever variant he needs. He gets more decal options and Trumpeter saves a lot (hopefully the buyer too) on parts (not) wasted with each packaging.
In fact, you make it sound like other manufacturers do it regularly, but I'd say such examples are exceptions rather than the rule.
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 10:46 AM UTC
From strictly a production/cost per unit stand point, producing "two-in-one" "early and late" kits would be much more cost effective for the manufacture. Make one slightly larger plastic part set, one box, one larger set of decals, one instruction sheet and then sell twice as many units. This would decrease production, shipping and marketing costs thereby greatly increasing profitability.
Remember the old AMT "three-in-one" car kits from the 70's and 80's? They gave the model builder stock, hotrod and custom options all in one box!
Remember the old AMT "three-in-one" car kits from the 70's and 80's? They gave the model builder stock, hotrod and custom options all in one box!
KurtLaughlin
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 11:02 AM UTC
Quoted Text
You say "if you don't like it , don't buy it.". Well if they were not the only ones offering this particular MAZ kit believe me I wouldn't be buying Trumpeter.
So what they see is: We made a sale!
Essentially, the message you are sending is, "Even if a kit has gross errors, if I like the subject enough I will still buy it."
Have you told Trumpeter or their US importers about this? While not as effective as "I saw your kit but didn't buy it because . . .", it is still better than posting here.
KL
KurtLaughlin
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 11:23 AM UTC
Quoted Text
From strictly a production/cost per unit stand point, producing "two-in-one" "early and late" kits would be much more cost effective for the manufacture. Make one slightly larger plastic part set, one box, one larger set of decals, one instruction sheet and then sell twice as many units. This would decrease production, shipping and marketing costs thereby greatly increasing profitability.
And this analysis is based on . . .?
If their projection is to sell 5000 Mk A and 2500 Mk B kits and they only sell 5500 of the Mk A/B kit, how do they come out ahead?
The single largest element in manufacturing cost these days is labor. The marginal costs in this example are practically the same so it is better to sell 7500 than 5500.
. . . And this analysis is based on working the past 22 years as a manufacturing engineer and cost estimator.
KL
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 11:29 AM UTC
If the major armor model manufactures are not monitoring blogs like Armorama for trends and feedback information they are idiots! And if they are not you can bet their distributors are.
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 11:41 AM UTC
Kurt
If you can sell 5000 Mk.A kits and 2500 Mk.B kits manufacturing them separately for a total of 7500 units, why in the heck would you say you would ONLY sell 5500 units of a combined "two-in one kit". Why not 7500 of the combined kit? Shouldn't there be just as many people wanting a copy of both Marks?
And I can certainly manufacture 7500 of one kit cheaper per unit than I can make 5000 and 2500 of two different kits!
If you can sell 5000 Mk.A kits and 2500 Mk.B kits manufacturing them separately for a total of 7500 units, why in the heck would you say you would ONLY sell 5500 units of a combined "two-in one kit". Why not 7500 of the combined kit? Shouldn't there be just as many people wanting a copy of both Marks?
And I can certainly manufacture 7500 of one kit cheaper per unit than I can make 5000 and 2500 of two different kits!
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 12:12 PM UTC
Michael the only place you would save a minimal amount of money is the boxes as you would still need to make the parts from both boxes and place them in one package. Also you may sell a late and an early to the same person on some occasions and while they may purchase one of each they may not buy two of the same kit.
sharkmouth
New York, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 24 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 24 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 01:34 PM UTC
First off, you may not know me from Adam as I don't post regularly on any armor sites anymore. Yet, I have some experience many can't say they do.
That is exactly what they thought.
Well, then the companies and their distributors are idiots if this were true. Trumpeter used to have one person who I was in contact with using an online translator. It was difficult (to say the least). There are many forums so how are they to decide which to follow?
As for the original poster providing a list. I can tell you that the releases were coincidences as they only seem to reply to things like this:
One of several thousand photos and measurements taken by me over the years on trips of the subjects that interest me. Trumpeter responds to this, not lists.
I have friends at many museums and I've yet to be informed by any of them of a Trumpeter team visiting. This should help you in seeing that the designers may have never seen the subject and are definitely not experts. When photographs weren't clearly labeled, variants got mixed.
Anyway, I have seen many of the subjects whose photographs and measurements I have sent become kits. I can only wish that they look at the aircraft references I sent as well.
Regards,
Quoted Text
After a bit of research, here is the basic deal:
D-30 (early): Slotted baffle
D-30 (late): Slotted baffle with changed towing lug location
D-30A (or D-30M): New "double" baffle.
D-30J: Locally made Serbian D-30A.
Hope that helps clear it up a bit.
That is exactly what they thought.
Quoted Text
If the major armor model manufactures are not monitoring blogs like Armorama for trends and feedback information they are idiots! And if they are not you can bet their distributors are.
Well, then the companies and their distributors are idiots if this were true. Trumpeter used to have one person who I was in contact with using an online translator. It was difficult (to say the least). There are many forums so how are they to decide which to follow?
As for the original poster providing a list. I can tell you that the releases were coincidences as they only seem to reply to things like this:
One of several thousand photos and measurements taken by me over the years on trips of the subjects that interest me. Trumpeter responds to this, not lists.
I have friends at many museums and I've yet to be informed by any of them of a Trumpeter team visiting. This should help you in seeing that the designers may have never seen the subject and are definitely not experts. When photographs weren't clearly labeled, variants got mixed.
Anyway, I have seen many of the subjects whose photographs and measurements I have sent become kits. I can only wish that they look at the aircraft references I sent as well.
Regards,
ninjrk
Alabama, United States
Joined: January 26, 2006
KitMaker: 1,381 posts
Armorama: 1,347 posts
Joined: January 26, 2006
KitMaker: 1,381 posts
Armorama: 1,347 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 01:55 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Anyway, I have seen many of the subjects whose photographs and measurements I have sent become kits. I can only wish that they look at the aircraft references I sent as well.
Regards,
Well, if they ever want to do a Black prince or ARL 44 kick them my way, I have measurements galore for them!
sharkmouth
New York, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 24 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 24 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 01:57 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Well, if they ever want to do a Black prince or ARL 44 kick them my way, I have measurements galore for them!
Have you tried Meng for that subject? If I thought Dragon would release British items, I would recommend you try them as well.
Regards,
tanknick22
United States
Joined: February 19, 2009
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 1,100 posts
Joined: February 19, 2009
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 1,100 posts
Posted: Friday, June 13, 2014 - 03:10 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Hello Trumpeter,
I decided to make it official and point on some facts about the way how accurate and how selective you are producing your model kits.
I can´t ignore anymore the fact that every model kit you are producing has a lot of shape issues or missing details, which have to be solved with additional expensive etched parts from China and Co.
Let´s take an example. Your late D-30 howitzer is a joke and a diret insult to every serious paying modeller. How can you dare to sell it as a "late" version when the muzzle brake stills the same. At your catalogue you have posted a picture for the "late" type #02329 (page 39), using Yugoslav military archives:
It shows an Yugoslav late D-30 howitzer during excercise in 1997.
here´s a picture from the Yugoslav army in 2002, using the same late D-30 howitzer:
here´s my D-30 howitzer, built from SKIF:
and this is your "late" D-30 howitzer
Probably you management can remember, some 4-5 years ago, I wrote to you an E-Mail with a complete list of Soviet / Russian Cold War era vehicles. All the tanks and vehicles you are producing and selling meanwhile are from the list I sent to you. Meanwhile I´m wondering why you still producing 2-3 different Iraqi T-62 tanks, a lot of T-64 tanks and so on. You have never thought about trying to make some serious stuff from the Yugoslav civil war in the 90´s, like the M-84 and M-84A tanks, Yugoslav M-80 and M-80A APC´s or OT M-60.
You never tried to solve the issues with your SA-6 KUB air defence system (chassis or the ridiculous rockets).
What about some different sets for Soviet/ Russian tankers during Cold War era or different sets of Yugoslav army forces in 1/35. But no, you still producing German-Nazi vehicles, airplanes and soldiers from WWII in this version, and that version, at any scale and so on. Who cares for WWII anymore?
If you want to be a serious company, with your meanwhile expensive retail prices, you should take more care for accuracy and about the stuff the people want to build.
Please do not forget, quality is important, not quantity !
If you dont like thier kits dont buy them