Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Is Dragon's Black Label Hurting the Hobby?
MrCompletely
Visit this Community
Saitama-ken, Japan / 日本
Joined: February 12, 2016
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Posted: Monday, July 31, 2017 - 05:02 AM UTC
Totally agree in regards to the G4 Jeff; mine is currently 3/4 filler! Parts that don't line up all through the damn thing!
ALBOWIE
Visit this Community
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Monday, July 31, 2017 - 05:31 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Steve, the Saladin by black Plague is one of the best (of the few available) and is respectable. It is probably Black Plagues best kit. Compare it to Tamiya's



i would agree it is better than most BL kits but it was far and away severely overpriced (You could almost buy the very expensive and high Quality Accurate Armour Saladin for the release price). It may be their best kit in that line but that says a lot about the line than the quality of the kit. The kit is generally correct in outline but is deficient in so many other ways such as the glaring over simplification of the Exhaust Muffler assembly which connects to the engine by osmosis? or the lack of any hatch details on the inner faces or hatch splash rings or the myriad of othr smaller faults. The Tamiya Saladin Turret on their 1970's M113A1 FSV was actually better detailed than the "New" BL one. True the original late 60's Tamiya Saladin is a dog but I dont consider a BL Saladin which sold for $100Aud a bargain or reasonable. It is pretty much late 70's detail and quality but it is (sadly) the best Plastic Saladin Kit available in 35th.
Al
ALBOWIE
Visit this Community
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Monday, July 31, 2017 - 05:34 AM UTC

Quoted Text

The Dragon Saladin sells for $63 on Squadron.
No inner hatch detail
No main gun sleeve
Fire extinguishers unrecognizable
DS (ugh) wheels
No exhaust pipe (just an unconnected silencer)
etc etc

Takom AML90 $33 on Squadron
Tiger Models AMX10 $52 on Sprue Bros
Hobby Boss BA10 $44 on Sprue Bros

All the above are good models with lots of detail. Dragon can't even get the wire mesh screen right on the Saladin.

I only bought one because its the only one out there and I used to drive the damn things at Duxford. Now the DML piece of junk is out do you imagine anyone else will do it? THATS why I'm pi**ed and DML can go jump in the lake.


Quoted Text

Steve, the Saladin by black Plague is one of the best (of the few available) and is respectable. It is probably Black Plagues best kit. Compare it to Tamiya's





I am so looking for a Like button, couldn't have put it better
davejr
Visit this Community
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: October 30, 2005
KitMaker: 91 posts
Armorama: 80 posts
Posted: Monday, July 31, 2017 - 07:36 AM UTC
Lol so it has finnaly happened!we've become so spoiled with the quality of todays kits that not so perfect kits like the black death kits from dml are making people think its hurti g the hobby. How soon we forget the toy like kits from the 70's that most were not even close to being accurate or to scale and that never stopped the hobby from growing lol so why would the black death lable kits hurt the hobby? As nice as kirs have become there will never be a 100% accurate kit ! Rivet counters will always find somthing to cry about !
DG0542
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: March 04, 2015
KitMaker: 125 posts
Armorama: 125 posts
Posted: Monday, July 31, 2017 - 07:46 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Lol so it has finnaly happened!we've become so spoiled with the quality of todays kits that not so perfect kits like the black death kits from dml are making people think its hurti g the hobby. How soon we forget the toy like kits from the 70's that most were not even close to being accurate or to scale and that never stopped the hobby from growing lol so why would the black death lable kits hurt the hobby? As nice as kirs have become there will never be a 100% accurate kit ! Rivet counters will always find somthing to cry about !



Irony calling kits Black Death in a post about the problem of people complaining about kits.
MrCompletely
Visit this Community
Saitama-ken, Japan / 日本
Joined: February 12, 2016
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Posted: Monday, July 31, 2017 - 09:57 AM UTC
I believe the O.P. was ASKING if people thought Black Label was hurting the hobby, NOT stating it was.Unless I'm mistaken too, the biggest percentage of us here are of a vintage that does indeed remember the old, inaccurate kits of days gone by and that is precisely WHY we decry Dragon putting out something that resembles those old dogs for (for many of us) outrageous prices. Are we expected to be filled with nostalgia instead?
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Monday, July 31, 2017 - 10:24 AM UTC
Let me use a Medieval analogy based on the nickname Black Death. The first great plague of the pandemic wiped out as much as a third of Europe's population.

That increased opportunities of those who survived and paved the way for the Renaissance. So the Black Label kits are paving the way for new subjects in model building. They show that subjects can be other than World War II. Black Label like the Black Death is opening up new opportunities.

Honestly if it wasn't for Black Label doing cold war subjects would we have Amx-13s from two companies? If it wasn't for Black Label doing Allied prototypes would we have any thing other than Panzer '46?

You may say World of Tanks, but what company delved into the heavies and experimental stuff from countries other that Germany before Dragon's Black Label?

Anything that broadens the hobby , no matter how awful the actual building experience is good for the hobby. Remember the first resin after market? Remember the first individual track link? Hideous and evil as the buboes of the Black Death, but now we cherish them.

vettejack
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: November 23, 2012
KitMaker: 1,277 posts
Armorama: 1,254 posts
Posted: Monday, July 31, 2017 - 10:56 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Steve, the Saladin by black Plague is one of the best (of the few available) and is respectable. It is probably Black Plagues best kit. Compare it to Tamiya's



i would agree it is better than most BL kits but it was far and away severely overpriced (You could almost buy the very expensive and high Quality Accurate Armour Saladin for the release price). It may be their best kit in that line but that says a lot about the line than the quality of the kit. The kit is generally correct in outline but is deficient in so many other ways such as the glaring over simplification of the Exhaust Muffler assembly which connects to the engine by osmosis? or the lack of any hatch details on the inner faces or hatch splash rings or the myriad of othr smaller faults. The Tamiya Saladin Turret on their 1970's M113A1 FSV was actually better detailed than the "New" BL one. True the original late 60's Tamiya Saladin is a dog but I dont consider a BL Saladin which sold for $100Aud a bargain or reasonable. It is pretty much late 70's detail and quality but it is (sadly) the best Plastic Saladin Kit available in 35th.
Al



Bypassing it all, I ended up some time ago purchasing the Accurate Armor Saladin. IMHO, it's a jewel of a kit, and I'll be using Keith F's post to correct the minor issues! Yes, the AA kit is expensive, but I felt I would be better off spending money to acquire mostly an accurate kit than multiple acquisitions of aftermarket features correcting other Saladin releases. Rather be mostly correct the first time out.
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Writer
AEROSCALE
#197
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
Armorama: 2,859 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 01:15 AM UTC

Quoted Text

[
Bypassing it all, I ended up some time ago purchasing the Accurate Armor Saladin. IMHO, it's a jewel of a kit, and I'll be using Keith F's post to correct the minor issues! Yes, the AA kit is expensive, but I felt I would be better off spending money to acquire mostly an accurate kit than multiple acquisitions of aftermarket features correcting other Saladin releases. Rather be mostly correct the first time out.



Problem with Resin is the cost, and that scares away the average modeler. And if it is like the other Accurate Armor kits I do have, the casting details are VERY weak compared to the plastic kits. I would rather start with plastic and add resin as needed.

retiredyank
Visit this Community
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 02:07 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I believe the O.P. was ASKING if people thought Black Label was hurting the hobby, NOT stating it was.



Exactly.
KurtLaughlin
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 04:23 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I believe the O.P. was ASKING if people thought Black Label was hurting the hobby, NOT stating it was.



Yeah, so? People are giving their answer along with justifications of how they got there.

Did I miss a post where someone called for Matt to be lynched or something?

KL
retiredyank
Visit this Community
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 05:30 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I believe the O.P. was ASKING if people thought Black Label was hurting the hobby, NOT stating it was.



Yeah, so? People are giving their answer along with justifications of how they got there.

Did I miss a post where someone called for Matt to be lynched or something?

KL



Until moral is lifted, the beatings will continue.
davejr
Visit this Community
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: October 30, 2005
KitMaker: 91 posts
Armorama: 80 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 06:50 AM UTC
Lol i only refered to the black label kits as bkack death because of how everyone cries over them and my point about comparing black label kits to 70's era kits was because the intial post asked if they were hurting the hobby and if kits right up to the end of the nighties didnt hurt the hobby why would a few dogs hurt it now . WOW!
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 07:26 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I believe the O.P. was ASKING if people thought Black Label was hurting the hobby, NOT stating it was.



Yeah, so? People are giving their answer along with justifications of how they got there.

Did I miss a post where someone called for Matt to be lynched or something?

KL



Until moral is lifted, the beatings will continue.


Don't you mean morale? As far as I know we're all pretty moral around here.

But morale can always be lifted by a good beating. That is why it's traditional that sergeants carry canes in some armies.
Scarred
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 10:34 AM UTC
There was only one kit out of hundreds that has ever sworn me off of a model company. The MP Models M50. MP Models didn't have a big line of kits but after dealing with the M50 they never got another penny out of me. There was another, an early Trumpeter kit can't even remember what it was, that was of some type of plastic that didn't take any cement I could get my hands on. CA's wouldn't stick, paint wouldn't stick, it was a hunk of junk. The next Trumpeter kit I bought was the T-72 which was a direct copy of the Tamiya kit, right down to the Tamiya sprue markings and photo copied instructions. That put me off Trumpeter for years. I've only recently started building them again, they've gotten much better and with a bigger lineup of kits. I don't believe that Black Label kits are hurting the hobby at all, what they are doing to Dragon is another story.

Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 11:26 AM UTC

Quoted Text

There was only one kit out of hundreds that has ever sworn me off of a model company. The MP Models M50. MP Models didn't have a big line of kits but after dealing with the M50 they never got another penny out of me. There was another, an early Trumpeter kit can't even remember what it was, that was of some type of plastic that didn't take any cement I could get my hands on. CA's wouldn't stick, paint wouldn't stick, it was a hunk of junk. The next Trumpeter kit I bought was the T-72 which was a direct copy of the Tamiya kit, right down to the Tamiya sprue markings and photo copied instructions. That put me off Trumpeter for years. I've only recently started building them again, they've gotten much better and with a bigger lineup of kits. I don't believe that Black Label kits are hurting the hobby at all, what they are doing to Dragon is another story.



That was ABS plastic. It was marked in tiny print on the side. Now look at the box side and you'll see PS for polystyrene. I made it through a few of those since I had ABS glue left over from an LS gun kit and I used Plastruct liquid weld. Had to for all the Plastruct open stock I'd get from architecture models.

As for MP models, guess you never did low pressure injection molded like the old MPM or Ace kits. Braille scale and that crude. I built all the MP conversion stuff as it was easier to work with than first generation solid resin conversions .

I have never sworn off a company because from tons of experience I know one kit can be a total mess and another an absolute gem. I also manage to keep track of the sharing of molds because sometimes that's to the builder's favor. Revell Germany reboxes of ICM have better quality control. Revell Germany reboxes of Dragon have much better instructions. Original Frog kits are fine avoid later Russian remoldings as they're really crappy with worn out molds, poor quality control and lots of release agent.

There used to be a place in NYC whose slogan was "An educated consumer is our best customer." That's what you have to be. I've been following stuff so long I feel like I practically have half of Scalemates database in my freaking head.
panamadan
Visit this Community
Minnesota, United States
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 1,513 posts
Armorama: 1,449 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 04:56 PM UTC
https://www.google.com/search?q=good+good+let+the+nerd+rage&rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS743US743&oq=good+good+let+the+nerd+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l2.16618j1j7&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#imgrc=iQHaw_8f40dOmM:
Bravo1102
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 05:04 PM UTC
Yeah but is nerd rage; rage at nerds or is it rage about nerdy things? I always get confused about that, not being rageful myself. Too much Prozac.

The inquiring mindless want to know.

Scarred
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 05:57 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

There was only one kit out of hundreds that has ever sworn me off of a model company. The MP Models M50. MP Models didn't have a big line of kits but after dealing with the M50 they never got another penny out of me. There was another, an early Trumpeter kit can't even remember what it was, that was of some type of plastic that didn't take any cement I could get my hands on. CA's wouldn't stick, paint wouldn't stick, it was a hunk of junk. The next Trumpeter kit I bought was the T-72 which was a direct copy of the Tamiya kit, right down to the Tamiya sprue markings and photo copied instructions. That put me off Trumpeter for years. I've only recently started building them again, they've gotten much better and with a bigger lineup of kits. I don't believe that Black Label kits are hurting the hobby at all, what they are doing to Dragon is another story.



That was ABS plastic. It was marked in tiny print on the side. Now look at the box side and you'll see PS for polystyrene. I made it through a few of those since I had ABS glue left over from an LS gun kit and I used Plastruct liquid weld. Had to for all the Plastruct open stock I'd get from architecture models.

As for MP models, guess you never did low pressure injection molded like the old MPM or Ace kits. Braille scale and that crude. I built all the MP conversion stuff as it was easier to work with than first generation solid resin conversions .

I have never sworn off a company because from tons of experience I know one kit can be a total mess and another an absolute gem. I also manage to keep track of the sharing of molds because sometimes that's to the builder's favor. Revell Germany reboxes of ICM have better quality control. Revell Germany reboxes of Dragon have much better instructions. Original Frog kits are fine avoid later Russian remoldings as they're really crappy with worn out molds, poor quality control and lots of release agent.

There used to be a place in NYC whose slogan was "An educated consumer is our best customer." That's what you have to be. I've been following stuff so long I feel like I practically have half of Scalemates database in my freaking head.



Wasn't ABS because MEK wouldn't touch it. Got it from a shop in Korea while stationed over there. The M50 was more flash than sprue and most of the parts were off register. QC shouldn't have let that one by. I've had old soviet union, yes made in communist Russia, models of some obscure scale that were better than that MP kit.
pod3105
Visit this Community
Waterford, Ireland
Joined: August 08, 2010
KitMaker: 466 posts
Armorama: 444 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 06:07 PM UTC
As many have already identified,the emergence of so many new producers releasing previously only dreamt of kits,the short answer is so obviously -what do you think😉?
Spades
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: February 08, 2003
KitMaker: 776 posts
Armorama: 477 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 10:16 PM UTC
If you want a kit of what the BLACK LABEL should had been. Go buy TAKOM or MENG. They are putting out great kits. I bought the M103 when it first came out. One day I will get to it.

Those Black Labels should be renamed "All that potential gone".
tanknick22
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: February 19, 2009
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 1,100 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 10:30 PM UTC

Quoted Text

If you want a kit of what the BLACK LABEL should had been. Go buy TAKOM or MENG. They are putting out great kits. I bought the M103 when it first came out. One day I will get to it.

Those Black Labels should be renamed "All that potential gone".



Dragon's Black Plague ( Black Lable) line just plain sucks
landshark4
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: June 04, 2012
KitMaker: 103 posts
Armorama: 88 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 11:16 PM UTC
I'm still curious about the anger and hostility issue directed at Dragon that isn't directed at other companies. It seems only Dragon generates so much rage. Yet companies, such as Tamiya, put out kits with far less detail for more, yet they are only described in the most glowing of terms. The only time anyone seems to dare criticize Tamiya is if the rerelease a kit with a new barrel or rebox Italeri. What is it about Dragon that invokes so much passion?
truenorth
Visit this Community
Canada
Joined: July 27, 2017
KitMaker: 14 posts
Armorama: 10 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 11:29 PM UTC

Quoted Text

What is it about Dragon that invokes so much passion?



Up until a few years ago, I thought Dragon was answered prayers for armour builders. But then I started feeling ripped off. First, it was "white box" kits - allegedly never to be released again - getting reissued with minor changes, and for less money. Then it was ridiculous rehashes of good kits (made-up example: Stug III G, 15 March 1944, swing shift production) without magic tracks, metal barrels or photo-etch ... but for $20-$30 CAD more.

The final straw for me was one of their recent Panther prototypes, for which I paid $100 CAD. It contained a newly tooled turret but I was expected to perform major surgery to the hull. Sorry ... for that amount amount of money I shouldn't have to do that.

Tamiya's new releases tend to be cheaper (at least here), build easier and are less fiddly. I can say the same for my few experiences with Amusing, Meng and Takom.
leopard122
Visit this Community
European Union
Joined: August 26, 2016
KitMaker: 417 posts
Armorama: 411 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 - 11:38 PM UTC
But does the model kits need to be 100% correct? If we, or some sit and take measurement on all parts to just find fault on the kits...
If the kits are not to difficult to build and looks like the tank i think it's ok...
See meng models Cougar... Yes it's very wrong in some places but still a nice kits...
I have never bought the dragon kits you mean but that is only because that there are not any i want to have but if they release one i want then i will buy it....
Just my thoughts