M-8 Greyhound.
Armor/AFV: What If?
For those who like to build hypothetical or alternate history versions of armor/AFVs.
For those who like to build hypothetical or alternate history versions of armor/AFVs.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Which armored vehicle would you drive to work
Pave-Hawk
Western Australia, Australia
Joined: May 05, 2006
KitMaker: 900 posts
Armorama: 510 posts
Joined: May 05, 2006
KitMaker: 900 posts
Armorama: 510 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 02:08 PM UTC
MrMox
Aarhus, Denmark
Joined: July 18, 2003
KitMaker: 3,377 posts
Armorama: 1,088 posts
Joined: July 18, 2003
KitMaker: 3,377 posts
Armorama: 1,088 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 02:09 PM UTC
I like to ride in style, so I guess it has to be a m3 halftrack ....
If modern, then a Eagle from Mowag ...
If modern, then a Eagle from Mowag ...
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 02:17 PM UTC
Since we've just had a massive 75mm of snow and everyone is acting like it's the end of civilisation, probably one of these
David
David
strathcona
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2007
KitMaker: 30 posts
Armorama: 27 posts
Joined: January 19, 2007
KitMaker: 30 posts
Armorama: 27 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 02:19 PM UTC
Hello Gents!
I must add further, the vehicle I would like to drive to work , is a LAV III , like in my last post, but it is wheeled . For a tracked vehicle , it would be a Leopard C1/C2, or a Leopard 2A5/A6, these Cats are AWESOME ! Plus the Cats are relatively easy to maintain , and offer good mileage.The only downfall is lack of space for the kids. So again , Happy Modelling !
Frank
" PERSEVERANCE
You can hit a stationary Target at 2900 meters with Sabot, with a stationary Leopard C1, at nite. Stabilized Lazing Technique. Range 7B, Bergen Hohne, Germany.
I must add further, the vehicle I would like to drive to work , is a LAV III , like in my last post, but it is wheeled . For a tracked vehicle , it would be a Leopard C1/C2, or a Leopard 2A5/A6, these Cats are AWESOME ! Plus the Cats are relatively easy to maintain , and offer good mileage.The only downfall is lack of space for the kids. So again , Happy Modelling !
Frank
" PERSEVERANCE
You can hit a stationary Target at 2900 meters with Sabot, with a stationary Leopard C1, at nite. Stabilized Lazing Technique. Range 7B, Bergen Hohne, Germany.
SunTsu
Goteborgs och Bohus, Sweden
Joined: April 12, 2005
KitMaker: 48 posts
Armorama: 47 posts
Joined: April 12, 2005
KitMaker: 48 posts
Armorama: 47 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 05:45 PM UTC
Quoted Text
An M4A3E8 sherman. Because I love the classics
Jim
I'd say M4A1E8, but still...
That, or an M8 for those times when you want some speed and/or are low on fuel...
matt
Campaigns Administrator
New York, United States
Joined: February 28, 2002
KitMaker: 5,957 posts
Armorama: 2,956 posts
Joined: February 28, 2002
KitMaker: 5,957 posts
Armorama: 2,956 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 05:58 PM UTC
Stryker.............. Wheeled still moves and I think 8 wheels are cheaper than 2 sets of track(pads)
james_mcdougall_85
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: May 07, 2006
KitMaker: 169 posts
Armorama: 31 posts
Joined: May 07, 2006
KitMaker: 169 posts
Armorama: 31 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 06:13 PM UTC
I live in the Shetland Islands so it would be nice to have the option of going to work by sea. Thats why i would have a AAV-7A1. It would save me money on the inter island ferries and might even get me to Aberdeen instead of taking the ferry.
It would be fun to see how far I could get (Bergen, Norway 362Km) .
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c2/Aav.jpg
It would be fun to see how far I could get (Bergen, Norway 362Km) .
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c2/Aav.jpg
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 07:47 AM UTC
Personally I'd have a Ferret Mk 1 as a sportster runabout to get me to and from work.and to take the missus out in the evening (like she'd ever set foot in it!) . However with two teenaged girls who are into sports like hockey with lots of equipment, I'd need something bigger for the whole family, so I was thinking of getting a Saracen. With the 6 wheels and the rear cargo door, it's great for the modern family and with the new models coming with the DVD system for the kids in the back seat and individual climate controls for the rear seats, it's always a crowd pleaser. In addition, the multiple sun roofs make it easy for everyone to drive the way they want...
Paul
Paul
PanzerWolf
Michigan, United States
Joined: November 14, 2004
KitMaker: 26 posts
Armorama: 21 posts
Joined: November 14, 2004
KitMaker: 26 posts
Armorama: 21 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 08:36 AM UTC
For me it has to be a classic Panther Ausf G, great to take out the frustation of a busy commute
TankTrap
Invercargill, New Zealand
Joined: December 08, 2006
KitMaker: 456 posts
Armorama: 403 posts
Joined: December 08, 2006
KitMaker: 456 posts
Armorama: 403 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 08:48 AM UTC
StagHound Should do the trick.
orange_3D
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: July 28, 2005
KitMaker: 602 posts
Armorama: 469 posts
Joined: July 28, 2005
KitMaker: 602 posts
Armorama: 469 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 09:29 AM UTC
can i answer again?
swedish S-tank - looks very sporty
swedish S-tank - looks very sporty
SSgtMack
Arizona, United States
Joined: July 04, 2005
KitMaker: 117 posts
Armorama: 102 posts
Joined: July 04, 2005
KitMaker: 117 posts
Armorama: 102 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 11:02 AM UTC
I would go for a King Tiger (Henschel Turret). I really love those tanks. They are very intimidating.
Semper Fi!
Semper Fi!
jjumbo
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 01:01 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextNo idea what the hell this is. But It'd be a hella fun to drive down the street on.
Looks like a T29 heavy tank. It was made to counter the German Königstiger. Only a limited number prototypes were made.
As for vehicle to go to work, I'll have a Rooikat with an 105.
That's actually an American T28 Heavy Tank aka T95 Gun Motor Carriage.
It's armour was designed to be proof against any known enemy tanks and was designed for attacking heavily fortified positions .
It was going to be used in Japan but the A-Bomb put that plan on the shelf.
One was found on a target range in the U.S.A., buried under years of brush.
It's sitting at a museum somewhere in the lower 48.
jjumbo
p.s I think Accurate Armour used to produce a kit.
D_J_W
Hamilton, New Zealand
Joined: December 30, 2005
KitMaker: 436 posts
Armorama: 367 posts
Joined: December 30, 2005
KitMaker: 436 posts
Armorama: 367 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 01:12 PM UTC
Sitting in rush hour traffic is not a problem, there isn't any in this part of the world. The problem is tourists in camper vans, inter-city couriers and freight trucks, so what is needed is something with a bit of road presence :-) :-) :-) :-)
cheers
David
cheers
David
zontar
Hawaii, United States
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 1,646 posts
Armorama: 1,557 posts
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 1,646 posts
Armorama: 1,557 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 01:19 PM UTC
Great Topic!! M8 Greyhound. It's good to go topless here.
Hohenstaufen
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: December 13, 2004
KitMaker: 2,192 posts
Armorama: 1,615 posts
Joined: December 13, 2004
KitMaker: 2,192 posts
Armorama: 1,615 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 01:36 PM UTC
I've been saying for some time that if this demented government we have here bans motorcycles (purely for our own good of course), I shall buy a military vehicle, & drive it down the fast lane of the motorway @ 30 mph, or maybe 25 (Chieftain!) in the rush hour. I work shifts, so I'd have plenty of time available to make everyone elses life a misery, which is the point of the exercise. It would probably have to be something recent, or at least post-war, British & available, so a Saracen, Humber Pig, Fox or Scorpion (it has a Jaguar engine you know!) would do just fine. I'd also drive it flat out everywhere else, especially where it wasn't appropriate, & no, I wouldn't brake for slower traffic ahead (especially caravans!).
USMarine
Christchurch, New Zealand
Joined: September 17, 2005
KitMaker: 475 posts
Armorama: 259 posts
Joined: September 17, 2005
KitMaker: 475 posts
Armorama: 259 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 02:09 PM UTC
id probly have any series of the tiger tank,its some thing like 60 odd ton of pure car crushing material BUT i would do a engine transplate becuase i dont want to be stoping every 40 mins to let it cool down or do maintance on it,but if it was a pursuit with 8,9 ,10 cops on my tail just swing round the 88 n boom.well at least dreams are free (for now) lol
matt
matt
jazza
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 2,709 posts
Armorama: 1,818 posts
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 2,709 posts
Armorama: 1,818 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 03:05 PM UTC
Definitely the abrams with mine plow to sweep them road hoggers to one side.
A-Train
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 715 posts
Armorama: 433 posts
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 715 posts
Armorama: 433 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 03:56 PM UTC
Aww jeeze
"T-28
This is the sole survivor of a two vehicle super heavy tank program designed to deal with the Siegfried Line. Completed in December 1945, too late to see combat, it was not surprisingly impractical for battlefield use. With frontal armor of 12 inches, the vehicle weighed 95 tons and required four tracks. The tank featured a horizontal volute suspension and a 105 mm gun. Powered by the same V-8 used in the Pershing, the vehicle could only manage 8 mph."
I'm gonna be late again. Ah well.
And as for being designed in 1945, she looks pretty modern to me.
"T-28
This is the sole survivor of a two vehicle super heavy tank program designed to deal with the Siegfried Line. Completed in December 1945, too late to see combat, it was not surprisingly impractical for battlefield use. With frontal armor of 12 inches, the vehicle weighed 95 tons and required four tracks. The tank featured a horizontal volute suspension and a 105 mm gun. Powered by the same V-8 used in the Pershing, the vehicle could only manage 8 mph."
I'm gonna be late again. Ah well.
And as for being designed in 1945, she looks pretty modern to me.
prawdziwy-sok
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: February 09, 2007
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 5 posts
Joined: February 09, 2007
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 5 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 05:08 PM UTC
http://www.panzerbaer.de/workshop/wdieb_mod_87-a.htm
That one.
But because of gas prices I would have to report bankrupcy after couple of seconds.
That one.
But because of gas prices I would have to report bankrupcy after couple of seconds.
hogarth
Maryland, United States
Joined: June 02, 2006
KitMaker: 672 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Joined: June 02, 2006
KitMaker: 672 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 05:11 PM UTC
Well, let's see. I only live about 10 minutes from the school where I work, but that school is in the "hood" in Baltimore, one of the murder capitals of the USA......I think an LAV 25 would be fine. I don't think the crackheads have RPGs, and it's more maneuverable and faster than a tank. Plus, I'd have the chain gun to deal with any "issues" that might arise.
Rob
Rob
CavScoutSC
South Carolina, United States
Joined: August 17, 2005
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 7 posts
Joined: August 17, 2005
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 7 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 05:54 PM UTC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea what the hell this is. But It'd be a hella fun to drive down the street on.
T 28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
She is sitting near the path that takes you into the Patton Museum on Ft. Knox. That baby has 4 sets of track. Try and imagine changing/breaking track on the inside track. Ouch!!
Scouts out
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea what the hell this is. But It'd be a hella fun to drive down the street on.
T 28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
She is sitting near the path that takes you into the Patton Museum on Ft. Knox. That baby has 4 sets of track. Try and imagine changing/breaking track on the inside track. Ouch!!
Scouts out
Warsawpact
Västra Götaland, Sweden
Joined: September 25, 2006
KitMaker: 321 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Joined: September 25, 2006
KitMaker: 321 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 06:02 PM UTC
Since the third world war seems imminent i´d be driving one of these babies to work. Equiped whit maximum radiation protection and designed no to flip over when hit by the shockwave.
Linky : http://www.nemo.nu/ibisportal/5pansar/5sidor/5bilder/trojanov1.jpg
But most likely it would the Swedish Stridsvagn 103 ( S-tank). In the case of a trafficjam , just push the throttle and you´ll be litteraly flying away.
Linky: http://www.armyrecognition.com/europe/Suede/vehicules_lourds/CharS/CharS_Suede_04.jpg
Linky : http://www.nemo.nu/ibisportal/5pansar/5sidor/5bilder/trojanov1.jpg
But most likely it would the Swedish Stridsvagn 103 ( S-tank). In the case of a trafficjam , just push the throttle and you´ll be litteraly flying away.
Linky: http://www.armyrecognition.com/europe/Suede/vehicules_lourds/CharS/CharS_Suede_04.jpg
major_rocketlauncher
Joined: February 09, 2007
KitMaker: 4 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
KitMaker: 4 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 08, 2007 - 07:41 PM UTC
I would definitly drive either (a) a sherman M1A1 because it is my favorite tank or (b) a panther II because it is a such a gigantic
marathon
Texas, United States
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Posted: Friday, February 09, 2007 - 12:19 AM UTC
If gas prices and track replacemrent wasn't an issue, I'd pick an Abrams. No one would dare to cut you off or tailgate you once you lay in that 120-mm smoothbore.
But a LAV-25 would be fun too. While I do not consider myself to be a bloodthirsty person, sometimes a burst of 25-mike-mike would go a long way.....................
But a LAV-25 would be fun too. While I do not consider myself to be a bloodthirsty person, sometimes a burst of 25-mike-mike would go a long way.....................