Armor/AFV: Axis - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Axis forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
KingTiger (Octopus scheme) colors?
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 12:20 AM UTC
Very interesting Ralph,

Thanks for that. The colour issue of the octopus is definately resolved, and it's clear that the tank was pretty rusty, probably around the time the 'swastika' photo was taken, accounting for the poor condition of the turret paint scheme in that photo.

Shame we can't see what colour the bit under the schurzen is!

James
spitfire303
Visit this Community
Vendee, France
Joined: December 22, 2006
KitMaker: 1,437 posts
Armorama: 1,406 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 01:00 AM UTC
god d...n it the firewall at work blocks the panzerarchive.de, will have to wait this evening...
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 01:20 AM UTC

Quoted Text

god d...n it the firewall at work blocks the panzerarchive.de, will have to wait this evening...



Don't get too excited, you're not missing too much!

James
endrju007
Visit this Community
Wojewodztwo Podkarpackie, Poland
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,435 posts
Armorama: 1,256 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 01:36 AM UTC

Quoted Text

god d...n it the firewall at work blocks the panzerarchive.de, will have to wait this evening...



It seems we're having same problem.

By the way - I believe that Olivegrun is right color, but it was not used as a base one. Dunkelgelb was usualy used as base color.

Andrzej
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 01:58 AM UTC

Quoted Text

By the way - I believe that Olivegrun is right color, but it was not used as a base one. Dunkelgelb was usualy used as base color.

Andrzej



Not for late war vehicles i'm afraid.

In November '44 the order went out to use olivgrun as a base coat with brown and yellow used as disruptive camouflage. This continued until (possibly) April when a reversal on the order stated the dunklegelb was again to be used as a base.

Of course this changeover wasn't completely adhered to as factories used up the stocks of paint they already have, therefore AFV's produced during this time will be seen in olivgrun and dunklegelb base coat.

Even stranger, there was apparently an order allowing the use of panzergrau to be used at the very end of the war, although there is no evidence that this was instigated (IIRC it was to be instigated in June by which the war was over.)

James

(Flinches and prepares for repremand by Mr. Ackermans)
Henk
Visit this Community
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: August 07, 2004
KitMaker: 6,391 posts
Armorama: 4,258 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 02:26 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Even stranger, there was apparently an order allowing the use of panzergrau to be used at the very end of the war, although there is no evidence that this was instigated (IIRC it was to be instigated in June by which the war was over.)



I don't know how accurate that is, but I have seen it mentioned before. It would not be as strange as one might think though. During early 1945 (when this order was apparently made) much of the fighting was defensive, and in built-up areas. In that environment, Panzer Grau would have been a sensible colour choice.
Indeed, Colonel John Frost remarked, when the 2nd Parachute batalion took up position around the Arnhem bridge, that their (woodland) camouflage of the Dennison smocks was wrong for the urban environment that they were fighting in.
Also reference the Berlin Camouflage of the Britishs AFV's in Berlin during the 70's. Large blocks of White, Grey and Black(ish).


Henk
PantherF
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 02:27 AM UTC
So what is the final word on the illustrations shown? Are the colors "flipped"? Without going out and buying the book, this is the most complete overview of a paint scheme to use as a reference to copy.
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 02:59 AM UTC
I agree Henk,

Some good points.


Quoted Text

So what is the final word on the illustrations shown? Are the colors "flipped"? Without going out and buying the book, this is the most complete overview of a paint scheme to use as a reference to copy.



If I was going to go for an octopus scheme i'd say that Trojca, while perhaps not reputable, isn't far wrong.

Olivegrun base with Dunklegelb hard edged disruptive dunklegelb bands, within which numerous olivgrun circles are painted. It also appears from the photos that the wheels were in dunklegelb, although as spit mentioned, you could justify doing them in olivgrun if not intending to model this very tank.
Now then........
If you leave all your schurzen in position then you have nothing to fear (except perhaps the disruptive band on the left front that doesn't appear to continue onto the tank), if showing them removed you need to apply a different scheme in the areas the schurzen would have masked. It appears to be a hard edged scheme, and while I can't be 100%, this could likely be the factory hard edged camo seen on many tanks late in the war, again with an olivgrun base with yellow and brown disruptive colours. However, without colour photo evidence of this part of the tank it is impossible to say with any certainty. I think it could be an earlier coat of olivgrun and dunklegelb (from the b+w pics there doesn't appear to be a darker shade that would be brown). The dunklegelb being disruptive and then having green 'swirls' applied rather than dots. This is my own beleif though from looking at the available pics.
It would appear that an entirely new base coat was applied after this with the schurzen in place. Otherwise there is no reason why just the dunklegelb bands could have been re-painted and the circles added instead of swirls.

Reasons for this?
It's possible that this tank was damaged at the factory (bombing raid?) and had to have a new coat of paint before being dispatched?

Was painting done when just the hull was complete? The turret arrives from krupp and is painted in olivgrun or octopus already and doesn't match the hull and so the hull is re-painted to match?

Just a couple of ideas.

Of course non of this matters if you leave your schurzen on or model one of the 'mysterious 7'!

James
spitfire303
Visit this Community
Vendee, France
Joined: December 22, 2006
KitMaker: 1,437 posts
Armorama: 1,406 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 03:12 AM UTC
'mysterious 7'!

Wow, that's nice. who wants a build log 'mysterious 7'! soon I may have enough KT to do it

just kidding
spit
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 03:33 AM UTC

Quoted Text

'mysterious 7'!

Wow, that's nice. who wants a build log 'mysterious 7'! soon I may have enough KT to do it

just kidding
spit



lol!

How about a mini campaign?

James
PantherF
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 03:42 AM UTC
Thanks James for your input. So if I may ask, what is the 'mysterious 7'?
olds98
Visit this Community
Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Joined: November 11, 2008
KitMaker: 37 posts
Armorama: 36 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 03:46 AM UTC
I also know the story that the guy on the picture in my post is a crewmember from this tank several years later. I got a picture of him as he sits on the radio operators hatch.
I`ve also the information that the Tiger was there till the 60s.
In the Trojca King Tiger Book is a pic of the tank which was taken from the right side from the highway beneath. But there you can`t see the camo...

olds98
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 04:13 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Thanks James for your input. So if I may ask, what is the 'mysterious 7'?



This is a nickname I just made up for the 7 other Tiger B's in the same 'batch' as this one, that could well have had octopus camo, and likely had a variety of late features.

Ralph, I (and i'm sure others here would to) would really appreciate any other info on this tank or any other pics you may have of it.

Cheers,

James
John_O
Visit this Community
Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Joined: November 23, 2007
KitMaker: 569 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 04:22 AM UTC
A mini campaign titled 'Octopus Camo' would cast the net a bit wider, leaving it open for other vehicles to be included. Could be nice.

John
Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 04:43 AM UTC

Quoted Text

A mini campaign titled 'Octopus Camo' would cast the net a bit wider, leaving it open for other vehicles to be included. Could be nice.

John



Why?

Is a title like:

'The last batch of 7 unphotographed Tiger B's completed by Henschel at their Kassel plant, likely with a mix of late and early features and almost certainly on transport tracks with possible octopus camouflage and an alternate hard edged pattern, possibly olivgrun and dunklegelb under schurzen that also may not match the corresponding hull camouflage pattern above campaign'

A bit too specific you think?

James
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 08:27 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Even stranger, there was apparently an order allowing the use of panzergrau to be used at the very end of the war, although there is no evidence that this was instigated (IIRC it was to be instigated in June by which the war was over.)



I don't know how accurate that is, but I have seen it mentioned before. It would not be as strange as one might think though. During early 1945 (when this order was apparently made) much of the fighting was defensive, and in built-up areas. In that environment, Panzer Grau would have been a sensible colour choice.
Indeed, Colonel John Frost remarked, when the 2nd Parachute batalion took up position around the Arnhem bridge, that their (woodland) camouflage of the Dennison smocks was wrong for the urban environment that they were fighting in.
Also reference the Berlin Camouflage of the Britishs AFV's in Berlin during the 70's. Large blocks of White, Grey and Black(ish).


Henk



The order to allow the use of Panzer Grau was purely based on the low running stock of other camo collors. However, the order stipulated that only when NONE of the other colors were available, a plant could use Panzer Grau.

Hence we see plenty 2-color camouflage at the end.

Looking at the color pics of Berlin at the end of the War, Panzer Grau would work, however, the severe fighting and ample rubble and debris around would quickly lend any camo color a good shade of urban dust.

Panzer Grau vehicles are found around Berlin during the fighting, as vehicles from training schools and Luftwaffe airfields were called into frontline duty.
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 08:31 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I also know the story that the guy on the picture in my post is a crewmember from this tank several years later. I got a picture of him as he sits on the radio operators hatch.
I`ve also the information that the Tiger was there till the 60s.
In the Trojca King Tiger Book is a pic of the tank which was taken from the right side from the highway beneath. But there you can`t see the camo...

olds98



AFAIK the shot with the group of men has the whole crew re-visiting their old mount. So the shot with the one at the radio hatch could be from the same moment. My info says those shots were from 1954.

And how exactly is that shot in the Trojca book? Under the tank or how?
Henk
Visit this Community
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: August 07, 2004
KitMaker: 6,391 posts
Armorama: 4,258 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 08:55 AM UTC
Regards using Panzer Grau if no other colour was available, does that mean that there were ready stocks of Panzer Grau (as left over from before 1943), which were kind of 'kept in reserve', or were new stocks to be made up? Which leads to the next question, why exactly were the stocks of Dunkel Gelb, Braun and Grun running low? Lack of pigment?

H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 09:05 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Regards using Panzer Grau if no other colour was available, does that mean that there were ready stocks of Panzer Grau (as left over from before 1943), which were kind of 'kept in reserve', or were new stocks to be made up? Which leads to the next question, why exactly were the stocks of Dunkel Gelb, Braun and Grun running low? Lack of pigment?




That's right. When the Germans switched to the 3-tone Dunkel Gelb/Rot Braun/Oliv Grün scheme, that switch was almost instanteneous. A nice pic from Henschel shows a Panzer Grau Tiger and 2 Dunkel Gelb Panthers being readied for acceptance tests.

Thusly, all plants had Panzer Grau in stock throughout the war.

AFAIK the only paint that country wide was running really low was Rot Braun. This means that SOME plants DID run out of it, while others had it still in supply.

And the reason might indeed be pigment, but I have no exact info on that. It does sound like the most credible reason.
Jupiterblitz
Joined: December 30, 2007
KitMaker: 885 posts
Armorama: 796 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 09:09 AM UTC
"...why exactly were the stocks of Dunkel Gelb, Braun and Grun running low? Lack of pigment?"

Think of which raw materials had to be used to produce colors - oil is one basic ingredient.

Further production capacities were reduced by destructive bombardments and occupation.

Supplyment of the decreased stocks were impeded by air assaults during daylights.

Finishing afvs and the simple maintenance of production itself became more and more difficult - if they managed it to finish a tank, they could not wait for colors delayed.
olds98
Visit this Community
Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Joined: November 11, 2008
KitMaker: 37 posts
Armorama: 36 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 09:57 AM UTC
The Tiger is placed in front of a bridge across the A7 highway. as you might know...
The picture in the Tiger-Book is taken from this highway up and you see the right side. But it`s to far away to see details from the camo.

olds98
Kelley
Visit this Community
Georgia, United States
Joined: November 21, 2002
KitMaker: 1,966 posts
Armorama: 1,635 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 10:12 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

In the Trojca King Tiger Book is a pic of the tank which was taken from the right side from the highway beneath. But there you can`t see the camo...

olds98



And how exactly is that shot in the Trojca book? Under the tank or how?


Herbert, the pic Ralph is referring to is shot from the road near an overpass, the Tiger sits just to the left of the overpass, and the photographer was on the other side of the road that runs beneath the overpass. It would be like you were looking up at the right side of the tank. It is a small pic and indeed none of the camo pattern can be made out.

In truth, I had not thought of this pic as another one of the "Octo" 'til Ralph mentioned it. Upon taking a closer look I think he could very well be right, it's hard to make out details due to the distance of the photographer from the tank but what can be made out fits; transport tracks, ribbed front fenders, no headlight, main gun jammed at full recoil. The surrounding vegetation also seems to fit, and there is an electrical tower in what looks to be the right place. Nice "pick-up" Ralph .

Oh and to illustrate just a little what some of us have said about accuracy and Trojka. In the book he says the tank referred to in the pic I was describing above was from sPzAbt 510. A few pages later on he identifies a clear pic of the "Octo" Tiger II as being from sPzAbt 511. I have always heard (according to Schneider and others) and thought that the "Octo" TII was part of 510, go figure .

Cheers,
Mike

edit: in fairness to Trojka, I have been going through some of my refs this evening, and I had forgotten, Schneider did the same thing in TICI. In the hardback edition, page 142 Octo-sPz 511, page 454 Octo-sPz510. They are most assuredly the same tank!
Kelley
Visit this Community
Georgia, United States
Joined: November 21, 2002
KitMaker: 1,966 posts
Armorama: 1,635 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 10:38 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I have a brilliant idea (not so crazy if you really think about for few seconds). This tank was in Germany right? We know the area (Kassel?). Do we know the name of the guy from the picture on the right side? He was told to be one of the crew members. Maybe he's still alive, if not maybe his children are around and they know something about this very tank (from histories of their father). Maybe one of our German colleagues could make a few phone calls, a small trip etc.

AOTRE - Armorama Octopus Team Research Expedition. What do you say

It's not so crazy.
spit


No it's not crazy, but I doubt you would get the type of info we, as modelers and/or armchair historians, would be interested in. I have spoken to a very few Allied vets who served in the armored divisions (including my dad), and read and talked to guys who have known and interviewed German vets who served in armored divisions. In most cases they could remember very little or no info about camo colors and schemes. One in particular that stands out; an internet aquaintance came to know a German vet, who was a crewman in a Tiger II, that participated in the Battle of Berlin. They talked at length about his experiences during the war and especially Berlin. When asked about the colors and camo scheme of his tank he said (and I'm paraphrasing here) that he never really paid attention to those things. Aside from the fact that they (the crew) were busy trying to stay alive, all he remembered was that everything was covered in dust.

Still, for anyone who has a chance to talk to a WW2 vet about their experiences do it, it's definitely worth your time. Sadly many of these men have passed on and more are leaving us daily.

Best,
Mike

edit: been doing a little more checking this evening and found this: From "Tiger the History of a Legendary Weapon 1942-45" by Kleine & Kühn, the caption from the pic of the right side with a former "crew member" standing by the tank.

Quoted Text

Just after the end of the war, Heinz Wilms of 3./511 found a knocked out Tiger II from his unit. The Tiger was destroyed in the final days of the war and driver Rudi Kaiser was killed.

Kelley
Visit this Community
Georgia, United States
Joined: November 21, 2002
KitMaker: 1,966 posts
Armorama: 1,635 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 02:01 PM UTC
Hi guys, I've been doing a little more digging this evening and found the following on the ML Axis forum. I had read this before, but my mind forgets this stuff too easily . Warning this is a lengthy post, but it is interesting reading if you're an Octopus fanatic . Also, for what it's worth I now know of at least nine pics of the Octo Tiger. That includes the color shot and the one pointed out by Ralph earlier, in the Trojka book, that was taken from the road below.

Mike


Quoted Text

There can be only one... Highlander by James Blackwell Posted on Sep 14 2000, 10:11 AM

Don,

Heres a slightly reworked copy of the post I put up on July 19 that Cran mentions above - what do you think? I feel they are all one and the same vehicle we are seeing.

Whether this was a factory applied scheme and there were others done in a similar look or it was just a single creative crew livening up a green basecoated Tiger with some yellow is the big question, but short of new photos turning up its only speculaion either way as the 'octopus' scheme shot on p.142 and 454 of "TIC 1" are actually the same Tiger as far as I am concerned.

I have a feeling we first thrashed this one out very early on here or on another board (TL1 or AFVN late 98/early 99) and we came to the conclusion that Schneider was having an each way bet on the one vehicle by putting it in both sections and that the p.454 shot was simply a later view of the one on p.142 seen KO'd near Kassel?

Note for example the MG spall near the ball mount, MG barrel at same angle, the matching 'octopus sucker rings', gun locked in same recoil position, same late (rare-ish) double waffle pattern track for the 18 tooth spkt., late fender bracing, bell mantlet, "U"-shaped rain guard over the gunner's sight, missing cupola hatch, background hills and road etc., are all too similar to be coincidence. Though of interest the LHS "U" bolt has been souvenired and one of the turret track hooks broken off.

Its also the subject of the 3rd last colour plate by Restayn in "TIC 1" where it is captioned as 510 though its shown only in red primer in the first Ed. In the revised copy just out, this is the one col. plate he has redone...and sadly still got wrong - its now shown in red and brown with no yellow! The first version was in direct opposition to the text on p.9, where its claimed they (ie. 510) "...only had the red anti-corrosion primer with wide green-olive curves with paint brush size dots of the same colour", yet the second attempt while commendable and now backing the text up doesn't match the one known colour photo taken of it which shows green with yellow.

The 511 (502 re-numbered on Jan 5 1945), camo info on the 8 Tiger IIs 3.Kp. they picked up in March is similar, though says on p.5 "The Tiger IIs received directly from the factories at the end of March 1945 did not get any markings. Due to the lack of the yellow-olive primer they only had the anti-corrosion coating. In order to obscure this treacherous colour, the crews painted broad green-olive wavy stripes on the tank and added brush-sized spots." Based on the photo this looks dubious info too.

While Restayn opts for red/yellow then red/brown approach, Peter Sarson goes for the correct green and yellow in the New Vanguard Tiger II. I personally can only make out 2 colour tones not 3, so it seems Schneider may be a little out in his description and Restayn in his interpretations.

The original colour shot I mentioned above is floating around somewhere (which I'm sadly yet to find...anyone...scan please?) showing it in the green/yellow livery.

Other shots of it I've found of it so far are in the following;

p.181 of Klein & Kuhn's "Tiger - The History of a Legendary Weapon" showing it from the RHS (FWIW claimed to be "3./511" in the caption with a former tanker from the unit it belonged to in front of it just after the war) which is a fairly solid clue to ownership...

Plus p.36 of a Jap Tank Mag Special; "WWII Military Vehicle Photo File Vol.1" from '93 shows it from the Front LHS (the same pic is on p.127 of "GP17" and p.96 "German Military Vehicles in Photographs (1)" - Groundpower Special Issue Feb.'98 too).

Also AFV News Vol.25/1 Mar-Apr 1990 has a fuller view of the swastika on the nose shot (ref. p.454 "TIC 1"), on its cover. The original US Signal Corps shot of it according to Bill "Last of the Panzers" Auerbach on p.9 of this issue was; "One of the bigger panzers abandoned off the autobahn near Kassel, Germany."

Bill also mentions bumping into the guy who took the earlier b&w & colour shot of it in 1946 while at a militaria show in the US a few years back, and says;

"For those interested, the vehicle is overall dark green with cream colored stripes. The cream may be a weathered sand color but I'm not sure; the vehicle burned after being hit and the turret side is rusted. Interestingly enough, an orange outlined skull-and-crossbones is visible in the color photo in the middle of the glacis plate."

As per New Vanguard No.1 "Kingtiger", 3.Kp. of 510 and 3.Kp. of 511 received their Tiger IIs from the Henschel factory on March 31 1945 and had their battles on April 1st at Kassel where Henschel was located. So it is toss a coin time again but from the K&K info I'd personally be hedging towards 3/511 pending anything definitive.

Mirko's currently building/built this one for Euro, so now hes back from his holidays he may be able to shed more light on its true identity and knowing how deep he digs...and he may even have more shots or other info...maybe even the colour pic??

Has anyone got any other shots of it (or any other Tiger in this scheme for that matter) in other refs they can think of to help complete the picture?

JB

Short history of this Tiger II...... by Mirko Bayerl Posted on Sep 14 2000, 1:48 PM

Hi

This Tiger,including 6 other were picked up by ca . 50 "Panzersoldaten" in late March 45 at Werk Mittelfeld.They marched south of Kassel-attached to the 326 V.G.D. and should support their own troops at Fritzlar.The first fight at Werkel they destroyed about 9 Shermans.They had to give up Werkel,because of heavy american Ari-fire. Later they moved back direction Kassel and this Tiger II was given the order to secure the Autobahn .It had a very strategic position with good views to west and south.It was standing on a crossroad near a bridge over the Autobahn. It would have been an impossible task for the american tanks to destroy it-if not a german civilian had guided the Sherman tanks into a ambush against the tiger from behind. From a near distance the Shermans knocked it out. The commander of this unit-acctually-the 3.Komp/511 was an Oberlt.Hermann Helpup. The Tiger is the very last version with probably the armored plates over the cooling air intake and four (or three) bent plates for the track tension wire on the left round air outlet.It also had - as all the last Tiger II - the tranport tracks from the factory. I have another shot of it from a long distance,and all the other mentioned pics.I dont have the color-pic of it ,i am still waiting!!!!! If this Tiger had the Green or Yellow as basecolor-only God knows-or Cran,or James-I dont! I have seen other pics from the very last units and they all shows the "standard ambush" pattern. To my knowledge this is the one and only Tiger II with this Cammo-who knows?

Best Regards Mirko



Jamesite
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 11:07 PM UTC
Marco, i'd say your reasons for colour shortages are spot on.
Pigments among other things would have been sourced from all over German occupied territory or imported from neutral countries, during the late stage of the war, this would have all but ceased and i'm sure priority would have been given to more important resources like steel and oil over 'luxuries' like paint, leading to the late war shortage of paint. We know that paint was more diluted from October/November '44 for this very reason, and despite making it go further, its quite understandable that it would be in short supply by spring '45.

Mike, Thankyou for the post!
Some great info there, great to get some more info and shed light on the subject.
An orange skull and crossbones on the front glacis? Does anyone have more info on this. I can't make it out in the 'swastika pic'.
It strikes me as unlikely that this was applied by the plant or crew (given the short time they had the Tiger), this could possibly be a post war grafiti like the swastika?
I have no knowledge of allied recovery markings or the like but could it have been painted on by allied troops upon its capture? Perhaps as a marking to the dead driver or as a keep off sign?

Also given the extremely short life span of this tank as described in Mike's post, the possibility of any schurzen swapping or re-painting by the crew seems more and more unlikely. I'd say all painting must have happend in the factory if it was picked up on March 31st and in action a day later.

Also if it is true that this tank was knocked out be Shermans from behind, what explains the damage evident on the right side pic that appears to be from a much smaller calibre than a 75/76mm, i'm guessing more like 20mm?

The plot thickens....

James