1⁄35PzKpfW V 'Panther' Ausf. G,
4
Comments
The tank was glued down to the terrain module using ordinary PVA, and the finished module with the model was glued to the finished wooden plaque with two-part epoxy. The final few detail bits, like the periscopes, antenna, and MG barrels, were added and … that was that!
Conclusion
The DML kit is really a beautiful example of the model manufacturer's craft. It's very well detailed and engineered (with the curious exception of the drive-sprocket-track-fit). The design of the kit's suspension along with the numerous optional parts makes for a very flexible kit. It's really too bad that DML appears to have taken it out of production. The AM-Works PE up-date set really adds a ton of detail, though, to an otherwise very nice kit. It's also well designed and engineered. Fit of the various parts is good and very little of the set appears to be just parts added to the set to up the parts count. The PE set also contains numerous optional parts to build most variations of the Panther G. Among its nicer features are the various thicknesses of brass used, the working tool clamps, and the many keeper chains that are etched to their main assemblies. The set offers all of the detail that the experienced builder will want, yet it still has enough "easy" to use parts and "easy" to build sub-assemblies that a less experienced modeler can use to make his PE investment worthwhile. However, both the DML kit and the AM-Works PE set could use better, more comprehensive instructions, so, as with many other builds, a good selection of references is almost a requirement to build either beyond their basic out-of-the box / bag configurations. This weakness in the instructions is quite typical for DML which is very unfortunate given that their kits usually offer so many building options that are unidentified or explained. AM-Works, on the other hand, is constantly improving their instructions, and they offer up-dated information and direct customer assistance through their website. This was a fun build, and I'm pretty pleased with the final results. I think the other guys in our AMPS chapter have also enjoyed the project, and I know that we all learned and improved our PE skills. More information and build notes can be found on Armorama. DML #6370 Panther Ausf. G with AM-Works PE Live links , and on our AMPS chapter's website. Thanks again to Alliance Model-Works for the generous donation of the test-build PE up-date sets!Comments
Mike I just want to take the time to thank you for sending in such a well written article.
NOV 28, 2011 - 12:49 AM
My pleasure, Darren! I hope that someone finds it useful, informative, or at least mildly entertaining.
Happy modeling!
NOV 28, 2011 - 03:04 AM
To all of my Armorama friends, both real-world and “virtual:”
It with a heavy heart and much sadness that I must say to you all that as of today I can no longer, in good conscious, remain a member and active participant here on Armorama or any other KitMaker Net site.
For many years, I have enjoyed my time here on Armorama. I have spent countless hours sharing my own builds and works with you, my friends. Over many hundreds of hours, I have tried to repay the debt I owe to modeling by sharing my techniques and methods while also answering questions. My intent has always been to try to help others to achieve their own modeling goals and to realize their own modeling potential. Through it all, I have tried to remain civil and respectful – To disagree without being disagreeable and to always be tactful. I think that in the main, I was able to do these things.
I have especially enjoyed viewing and commenting on the works that you, my friends, have taken the time to share. It is this interaction and social contact with you that I will miss the most.
Unfortunately, two recent incidents here by one of the official staff members have made Armorama a place where I cannot remain. Many of you may be aware of these two threads started by staff member Kevin Brandt, aka: SgtRam:
Armorama::Armor/AFV::Ode to Rivet Counters
Track_Link::General and Site News::Just Curious
Although I was willing to overlook the first of these threads as a momentary lapse of judgement and civility, when Brandt pursued the targets of his vicious personal attack to another forum, I could no longer rationalize nor passively accept and condone his behaviors and actions.
As an official member of the staff here on Armorama, Brandt holds a position of responsibility and represents both the site and its publisher. His behaviors are no longer the acts of a lone, anonymous internet voice; they become an extension of Armorama and its publisher. It does not matter that he (or anyone else) performs his functions here as a volunteer. As a staff member, he, his actions and his behaviors are inseparable from Armorama.
I sent PMs and emails to some of the staff and the publisher to protest Brandt’s behaviors and to ask that the publisher, Jim Starkweather, aka: staff_jim, take responsibility for Brandt’s actions. Unfortunately, my protests fell on deaf ears.
You may read Starkweather’s open reply here:
Armorama::Site Talk::staff_jim post
We are all judged, to some extent, by the company we keep, and at the time of my protest, it was my intention to simply cease any participation on any threads or topics that Brandt started or posted to. That intention, however, has shown itself to be impractical. I cannot separate the staff member from the site.
The real issue here is one of personal and corporate responsibility and civility. As long as the publisher refuses to take responsibility for his staff members, or as long as Brandt refuses to accept and show remorse for his own actions, Armorama is a site that condones and supports such behaviors.
To remain here, to continue to participate and contribute to this site’s content, is to effectively lend my own support and endorsement to what Brandt did and said. My personal ethic will not allow me to do so.
I suppose the possibility remains that the publisher, Jim Starkweather, and or staff member, Kevin Brandt, will do the right thing. It is possible that one day they might take responsibility for Brandt’s behavior and demonstrate some remorse by publically apologizing to Kurt Laughlin and Christophe Jacquemont for Brandt’s aggressive and viscous personal attacks on them. Accepting responsibility and apologizing would do much to restore this site’s reputation and establish some reasonable boundaries for civil behavior by all.
However, unless and until that day happens, I am afraid that I must bid you, my friends, farewell and…
Happy modeling!
Mike Roof, aka: SdAufKla
MAR 29, 2015 - 06:10 PM
Copyright ©2021 by Mike Roof. Images and/or videos also by copyright holder unless otherwise noted. The views and opinions expressed herein are solely the views and opinions of the authors and/or contributors to this Web site and do not necessarily represent the views and/or opinions of Armorama, KitMaker Network, or Silver Star Enterrpises. All rights reserved. Originally published on: 2011-11-28 00:00:00. Unique Reads: 23362