135
PzKpfW V 'Panther' Ausf. G,

Painting
Early into the build, I decided to build a mid / late-September '44 MAN produced tank. This allowed me to install most of the late production features, but required no Zimmerit, and made the use of the "disk" ambush camouflage scheme plausible. There is still a lot that's not completely known or understood about this camouflage, but it appears that it was applied over one of the early "factory" 3-color proto-patterns. Later, as the war progressed, each of the assembly firms seems to have settled on more-or-less recognizable factory-unique patterns, but in September '44, the factories were just beginning to apply camouflage before shipping the tanks and the patterns used appear variable.

For my model, I selected a 3-color cloud pattern seen on a MAN produced steel-wheeled Panther. This tank was produced at about the same time as my subject and is a very well photographed, with both sides and front clearly depicted in several reference sources. My planning assumption was that even if the factory camouflage patterns were variable, tanks coming off the assembly line at about the same time would have similar patterns. To replicate this pattern, I took copies of the Doyle plans in Panzer Tracts 5-3 and transferred the photographed pattern in pencil and chalk pastels (for added visual reference). I then used those drawings to guide me as I free-hand airbrushed the basic 3-color pattern on my model.

The basic finish was done with Tamiya paints. The colors were custom mixed. To mix my paints, I use an eye-dropper and dispense the paints and thinners by drop, so therefore I record the mixes by drops.

  • The "Panzer" dark yellow mix is XF-60 (20 drops) + XF-2 (10 drops) + XF-57 (10 drops).
  • The red brown mix is XF-64 (20 drops) + XF-60 (8 drops) + XF-55 (1 drop).
  • The olive green mix is XF-58 (20 drops) + XF-60 (12 drops) + XF-55 (2 drops).
To reduce the paint for airbrushing, I mix Tamiya X-20A thinner with ordinary lacquer thinner. I mix the reducer at approximately 50 drops of X-20A + 30 drops of lacquer thinner. This gives a mixed paint to reducer ratio of approximately 40 drops of paint to 80 drops of mixed reducer. To this reduced paint, I add about 5 drops of Tamiya X-22 Clear. The clear retards the drying time to keep it from drying in the airbrush tip. It also replaces some of the paint binder (without adding additional pigment) which improves the curing and adhesion properties.

I used the Uschi von der Rosten self-adhesive "disk" ambush camouflage masks over this basic 3-color camouflage. The dark yellow mix was the same as described above. A close study of photos shows that the "disk" pattern wasn't sprayed on the main gun barrel and is very suggestive that the factory painters over-lapped and turned their masks in whatever was the most convenient orientation to fit the vehicle spot being painted. I tried to replicate this on my model by using small sections of the Uschi mask and moving them after spraying small sections. The Uschi masks were very easy to use.
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move

About the Author

About Mike Roof (SdAufKla)
FROM: SOUTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES

I started modeling when I got a 1/72 Dauntless Dive Bomber for my 6th birthday in 1965 and havn't stopped since. Like many, I got my "serious" start when Monogram began putting Sheperd Paine's diorama "how-to" pamphlets in their kits in the early '70's. It was then that I realized that there co...


Comments

Mike I just want to take the time to thank you for sending in such a well written article.
NOV 28, 2011 - 12:49 AM
My pleasure, Darren! I hope that someone finds it useful, informative, or at least mildly entertaining. Happy modeling!
NOV 28, 2011 - 03:04 AM
I found it all 3, Mike...thank you!
NOV 29, 2011 - 05:49 PM
To all of my Armorama friends, both real-world and “virtual:” It with a heavy heart and much sadness that I must say to you all that as of today I can no longer, in good conscious, remain a member and active participant here on Armorama or any other KitMaker Net site. For many years, I have enjoyed my time here on Armorama. I have spent countless hours sharing my own builds and works with you, my friends. Over many hundreds of hours, I have tried to repay the debt I owe to modeling by sharing my techniques and methods while also answering questions. My intent has always been to try to help others to achieve their own modeling goals and to realize their own modeling potential. Through it all, I have tried to remain civil and respectful – To disagree without being disagreeable and to always be tactful. I think that in the main, I was able to do these things. I have especially enjoyed viewing and commenting on the works that you, my friends, have taken the time to share. It is this interaction and social contact with you that I will miss the most. Unfortunately, two recent incidents here by one of the official staff members have made Armorama a place where I cannot remain. Many of you may be aware of these two threads started by staff member Kevin Brandt, aka: SgtRam: Armorama::Armor/AFV::Ode to Rivet Counters Track_Link::General and Site News::Just Curious Although I was willing to overlook the first of these threads as a momentary lapse of judgement and civility, when Brandt pursued the targets of his vicious personal attack to another forum, I could no longer rationalize nor passively accept and condone his behaviors and actions. As an official member of the staff here on Armorama, Brandt holds a position of responsibility and represents both the site and its publisher. His behaviors are no longer the acts of a lone, anonymous internet voice; they become an extension of Armorama and its publisher. It does not matter that he (or anyone else) performs his functions here as a volunteer. As a staff member, he, his actions and his behaviors are inseparable from Armorama. I sent PMs and emails to some of the staff and the publisher to protest Brandt’s behaviors and to ask that the publisher, Jim Starkweather, aka: staff_jim, take responsibility for Brandt’s actions. Unfortunately, my protests fell on deaf ears. You may read Starkweather’s open reply here: Armorama::Site Talk::staff_jim post We are all judged, to some extent, by the company we keep, and at the time of my protest, it was my intention to simply cease any participation on any threads or topics that Brandt started or posted to. That intention, however, has shown itself to be impractical. I cannot separate the staff member from the site. The real issue here is one of personal and corporate responsibility and civility. As long as the publisher refuses to take responsibility for his staff members, or as long as Brandt refuses to accept and show remorse for his own actions, Armorama is a site that condones and supports such behaviors. To remain here, to continue to participate and contribute to this site’s content, is to effectively lend my own support and endorsement to what Brandt did and said. My personal ethic will not allow me to do so. I suppose the possibility remains that the publisher, Jim Starkweather, and or staff member, Kevin Brandt, will do the right thing. It is possible that one day they might take responsibility for Brandt’s behavior and demonstrate some remorse by publically apologizing to Kurt Laughlin and Christophe Jacquemont for Brandt’s aggressive and viscous personal attacks on them. Accepting responsibility and apologizing would do much to restore this site’s reputation and establish some reasonable boundaries for civil behavior by all. However, unless and until that day happens, I am afraid that I must bid you, my friends, farewell and… Happy modeling! Mike Roof, aka: SdAufKla
MAR 29, 2015 - 06:10 PM