Campaigns
Where Armorama group builds can be discussed, organized, and updates posted.
Dragon OOB Campaign
Tojo72
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Posted: Friday, September 30, 2011 - 03:32 AM UTC
I would think that unless you use the method where you melt the plastic and scribe the zimm pattern in,it wouldn't be allowed.But Sal will have the final say on that one.
ltb073
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: March 08, 2010
KitMaker: 3,662 posts
Armorama: 3,078 posts
Posted: Friday, September 30, 2011 - 03:35 AM UTC
Hi sorry I have been away at work no internet
@ Paul if you build wingy thingy as well as you build armor then I'm looking forward to that
@Stan yes you can put your build in a diorama but if you chose a figure kit it has to be in a diorama.
@Kevin adding home made Zimm is like using putty to fill seams so that is ok but an AM Zimm set would not be allowed
Hope that cleared up some questions and I'm still at work so when I get a chance over the weekend I will write up the proposal and get it submitted
stansmith
Visit this Community
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: July 18, 2010
KitMaker: 611 posts
Armorama: 584 posts
Posted: Friday, September 30, 2011 - 03:56 AM UTC
thanks for letting me know, i'm in then.
panzerbob01
Visit this Community
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Friday, September 30, 2011 - 07:19 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi sorry I have been away at work no internet
@ ....
@Kevin adding home made Zimm is like using putty to fill seams so that is ok but an AM Zimm set would not be allowed
Hope that cleared up some questions and I'm still at work so when I get a chance over the weekend I will write up the proposal and get it submitted



@Kevin: Well, Pard - guess I guessed wrongly!

@Sal: I suppose I am somewhat confused! If "OOTB" means out of the box, and no zimm comes in the box, why is this allowed? I'm not actually protesting here, but I am curious... I would not have thought puttying seams and sinks (repairing faults in the kit - not adding details, but doing "good modelling") equated with adding on a detail (zimm is an added detail). By this measure, it becomes a gray thing indeed as to what counts and what does not! I am currently guessing that "OOTB" means here "no formal AM kit or bits added", but scratch detailing is OK? If I can add putty zimm, can I replace molded-on fender brackets with items made from sheet styrene, or build a radio rack from styrene or tin-foil? These are not formal AM kits, but certes also not from the box.

I'm really much interested in clarification: This is exactly the discussion we've been having at our club meeting as we get closer to our next show and some of us clamor for an "OOTB" category and others dwell on the definition. And it's this kind of grayness about OOTB that has lead some clubs and shows to say "skip it" as a contest category. Which, IMHO, is very sad - as OOTB allows a modeller to demo his/her skills without the "distraction" of having added a bunch of stuff. The OOTB build showcases what you can do with what you got in the kit, or so I thought. PS: I guess I am pretty conservative about it and say that the parts must be in the box - no making parts (such as adding conduits from sprue from the box, etc.), no scratch add-ons, no PE or AM kits and bits (cans, gun barrels, etc.). The "gray area" for me comes when the kit instructions say to "get a piece of brass or copper wire and use it to make a tow pin" - and no wire is provided (somthing seen to happen in some Italeri kits, etc.). But that's my perspective and understanding.

Bob
GaryKato
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: December 06, 2004
KitMaker: 3,694 posts
Armorama: 2,693 posts
Posted: Friday, September 30, 2011 - 07:29 PM UTC
I know that in the "Strictly OOB" campaign here, you had to use only what was in the box. But I guess that is why they put in "Strictly". Some kits provide the ends for tow cables but the builder is supposed to provide the string or wire for the cable itself. In the "Strictly OOB" campaign, that was not allowed. It's up to the leader here to decide/clarify.
ltb073
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: March 08, 2010
KitMaker: 3,662 posts
Armorama: 3,078 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 01, 2011 - 01:59 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Sal: I suppose I am somewhat confused! If "OOTB" means out of the box, and no zimm comes in the box, why is this allowed? I'm not actually protesting here, but I am curious... I would not have thought puttying seams and sinks (repairing faults in the kit - not adding details, but doing "good modelling") equated with adding on a detail (zimm is an added detail). By this measure, it becomes a gray thing indeed as to what counts and what does not! I am currently guessing that "OOTB" means here "no formal AM kit or bits added", but scratch detailing is OK? If I can add putty zimm, can I replace molded-on fender brackets with items made from sheet styrene, or build a radio rack from styrene or tin-foil? These are not formal AM kits, but certes also not from the box.

I'm really much interested in clarification: This is exactly the discussion we've been having at our club meeting as we get closer to our next show and some of us clamor for an "OOTB" category and others dwell on the definition. And it's this kind of grayness about OOTB that has lead some clubs and shows to say "skip it" as a contest category. Which, IMHO, is very sad - as OOTB allows a modeller to demo his/her skills without the "distraction" of having added a bunch of stuff. The OOTB build showcases what you can do with what you got in the kit, or so I thought. PS: I guess I am pretty conservative about it and say that the parts must be in the box - no making parts (such as adding conduits from sprue from the box, etc.), no scratch add-ons, no PE or AM kits and bits (cans, gun barrels, etc.). The "gray area" for me comes when the kit instructions say to "get a piece of brass or copper wire and use it to make a tow pin" - and no wire is provided (somthing seen to happen in some Italeri kits, etc.). But that's my perspective and understanding.

Bob



Bob, I can understand the confusion here and I too belong to a club, that has lawers in it that feel the need to argue everything, even if it dont pertain to them, it must be there nature. But in MHO I feel that putty is like paint you wouldn't build a kit without painting it so if you want to use putty or some type of Mr. Surfacer to enhance your build I dont see a problem with it
Additionally, like in the Strictly OOB Campaign my kits directions called for the addition of wire that was not included. I therefore had to use the plastic tow hooks instead of the nice PE ones that came with the kit
So for this campaign what I am looking for is for you to build any Dragon/Cyberhobby kit with all the goodies that are included with the kit, the way the manufacture intended. No Aftermarket, expensive PE kits will be allowed. If the directions say to use a piece of wire that not included that is fine. If the carpet monster eats a piece and you need to make a new 1 from evergreen or the instructions say to attach a jerry can and there is no bracket to attach it to, that will be ok as well. What I dont want here is an entire reconfiguration of the turret with evergreen, or the addition of a bunch AM barrels and tracks.
This is not intended to be a scratch build campaign but 1 where you build your Dragon Kit the way the instruction state.
I loved the Tamiya Campaign, which is where I got this idea, all those old kits coming out of the stash, but a lot of those kits needed a little AM help and the guys are doing a great job there, some really fantastic builds. Dragon kits cost more so the need for the AM is less. So lets leave this campaign to Dragon OOB
Hope that cleared things up
panzerbob01
Visit this Community
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 01, 2011 - 05:43 PM UTC
Sal:

Thanks!

Hey, my club's PREZ is a lawyer!

So, as this seems more "OOTB - lite and flexible", what about my adding on some scratch conduits and wiring and head-phones around a radio set? No AM - just a little stretched sprue or solder and a little styrene sheet...?

Maybe what could be cool is a "Dragon w/out AM" or a "Dragon with scratch only" campaign! Where one can fix the ills and make those bits as we want (good old-school modelling and scratch work) but cannot buy and add on the PE, AM barrels and tracks! This would surely short out the carpers (like me!) and be a money-saver for some!

Bob
ltb073
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: March 08, 2010
KitMaker: 3,662 posts
Armorama: 3,078 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 02, 2011 - 04:20 PM UTC

Quoted Text


So, as this seems more "OOTB - lite and flexible", what about my adding on some scratch conduits and wiring and head-phones around a radio set? No AM - just a little stretched sprue or solder and a little styrene sheet...?
Bob



Yes, Dragon OOTB lite, Campaign has been submitted. Now lets keep our fingers crossed cause I have about 15 Dragon Kits in the stash that need to be built
GaryKato
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: December 06, 2004
KitMaker: 3,694 posts
Armorama: 2,693 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 - 03:36 PM UTC
Campaign approved. Here is the link to the campaign page for enlisting.
Dragon OOB
ltb073
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: March 08, 2010
KitMaker: 3,662 posts
Armorama: 3,078 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 - 05:53 PM UTC
Thanks Gary, ok guys let's sign up and start thinking what we are gonna build.
Anybody care to design a simple DML red and white ribbon, my computer skills are less then my modeling skills and I have no idea how to do those things
Tojo72
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 06, 2011 - 09:12 AM UTC
Currently the free Dragon kits I have in my stash not committed to any campaigns are :

Panzer I-A DAK
Panzer IV Vorpanzer #6301
M-7 Priest


Any thoughts,doesn't mean I wont get more more but thats the choice for now.
steph2102
Visit this Community
Isere, France
Joined: April 23, 2011
KitMaker: 735 posts
Armorama: 606 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 06, 2011 - 09:47 AM UTC
hello,
happy to be your campaign SAL. I think my choice is made, I will make the Sherman Thunderbolt VII.
panzerIV
Visit this Community
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: January 02, 2007
KitMaker: 781 posts
Armorama: 676 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 06, 2011 - 10:26 AM UTC
hi Sal

can you confirm for me that you are allowing winged aircraft aswell in campaign or do we have to build armour aswell? the quote of your reply in earlier post confused me haha

'' @ Paul if you build wingy thingy as well as you build armor then I'm looking forward to that ''

cheers tony
ltb073
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: March 08, 2010
KitMaker: 3,662 posts
Armorama: 3,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 06, 2011 - 10:42 AM UTC

Quoted Text

hi Sal

can you confirm for me that you are allowing winged aircraft aswell in campaign or do we have to build armour aswell? the quote of your reply in earlier post confused me haha

'' @ Paul if you build wingy thingy as well as you build armor then I'm looking forward to that ''

cheers tony



@ Anthony, yes wingy thingys are allowed, any Dragon/Cyberhobby kit for that matter
@Steph Sherman Thunderbolt VII, looking forward to that
@Anthony C. I would vote for the Panzer IV Vorpanzer with the big Hansi decal

Myself I just received a new shipment of Dragon Kits today, Thanks Toddmann, I think I will go with the Sd.Kfz.186 JagdTiger #6285
http://www.scalehobbyist.com/images/products/DML/DML00006285/DML00006285_0_l.jpg
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Writer
AEROSCALE
#197
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
Armorama: 2,859 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 06, 2011 - 03:27 PM UTC
How is this for a ribbon?

panzerbob01
Visit this Community
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 06, 2011 - 03:34 PM UTC
Anthony C.;

Hi!

Dragon Pz 1B DAK version or Pz IV vorpanzer (6301)? Hmmmmm. I'm on that 1B kit right now. I've only fingered the sprues in the bags on that Pz IV.

Two way different things! The Pz 1B is an older kit but actually pretty nice - but tiny tracks you need to remove from sprues... Its modest in complexity and has proven to be mostly a straight-forward build, albeit there are several things which could use help and modification... The Pz IV vorpanzer kit is a way-big monster bulging with parts. It may take some of us modelers more than a weekend to build . It IS cool, and it does have magic tracks I'm sure there are things that could be improved in this one, too. Coolness-wise, go with it! Prepare yourself and allocate some serious bench time! Oh, and yeah, if there is a huge "Hansi" decal, USE IT

I know nada about the 3rd kit on your list, so won't suggest you do that one!

Bob
vonHengest
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Armorama: 4,817 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 06, 2011 - 05:24 PM UTC
Sal: Enlisted, number 5

Kevin: I like it! Anyway you can add a thin black outline to the text so it doesn't disappear in the white?
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Writer
AEROSCALE
#197
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
Armorama: 2,859 posts
Posted: Friday, October 07, 2011 - 12:48 AM UTC
Here, how is this?

ltb073
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: March 08, 2010
KitMaker: 3,662 posts
Armorama: 3,078 posts
Posted: Friday, October 07, 2011 - 04:03 AM UTC
Hey Kevin Thanks for the ribbon design I actually like it better the 1st way but l'll let the members weigh in with there .02 cents and we'll see what they think
and guys don't forget to enlist Gary has put the link up and has made it official for us
vonHengest
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Armorama: 4,817 posts
Posted: Monday, October 10, 2011 - 06:32 PM UTC
Sal's right Kevin, it does look better the way you originally had it. Thanks for trying out a thought, and I vote for your first ribbon
JimF
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: July 05, 2002
KitMaker: 717 posts
Armorama: 621 posts
Posted: Monday, October 10, 2011 - 07:02 PM UTC
We're up to seven now
steph2102
Visit this Community
Isere, France
Joined: April 23, 2011
KitMaker: 735 posts
Armorama: 606 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 - 03:32 AM UTC
hello
KEVIN very beautiful ribbon. I prefer to go first ruban.STEPH
ltb073
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: March 08, 2010
KitMaker: 3,662 posts
Armorama: 3,078 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 - 04:08 AM UTC
Welcom to the campaign guys.
Ok, it looks like 3 votes for Kevins 1st ribbon and none for the 2nd. So being I just tried to upload the DML Ribbon onto the Campaign page and screwed it all up I am sending out a call of help to Gary, Can you please help us out and put the 1st DML Ribbon on to the Campaign page. See I warned you guys that I lacked computer skills. Thanks in advance
GaryKato
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: December 06, 2004
KitMaker: 3,694 posts
Armorama: 2,693 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 - 05:21 AM UTC
The problem was that the ribbon was a JPEG file while the campaign page needs a GIF file. In the graphics program I use, it is a simple matter of opening up the original and then using "Save As..." to convert it to whatever format I need. After that it is just a matter of following the directions in the thread for campaign leaders.
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Writer
AEROSCALE
#197
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
Armorama: 2,859 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 - 09:03 AM UTC
GIF Format