Armor/AFV: Axis - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Axis forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Chipping mythical
Grizz30_06
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: April 25, 2008
KitMaker: 8 posts
Armorama: 7 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 10:24 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

I can't say much about armored vehicles but it' been my experience that if you use a piece of heavy equipment long enough and/or hard enough the paint is going to get scratched or chipped. You can only it so may trees, rocks, vines sticks, chipmunks, etc. before the paint gets beat on. A friend of mine who works in construction quoted his boss as saying "if you don't break something every once in a while you aren't working hard enough".

Do people go over-board with chipping? Well isn't that human nature?

Grizz


Despite what the Testors' weathering suggestions said in the early 80's, the analogy between an AFV and a bulldozer is not complete. The bulldozer rams itself into rocks, dirt, asphalt, cement and trees on just about a daily basis, maybe 5 days a week for months on end for many years. A world war II front line tank, only spent a fraction of its time in combat or moving to combat. Its operational life might have been counted in hours rather than decades. If the bulldozer breaks, it may cost the contractor some money. If a tank breaks, it may cost the crew its lives.



Ok I can agree with that. To be honest I think that some times people look at a scale model as a canvas to create and others maybe as a representative of a machine used in a historical context. You almost have to admit, right or wrong historically, that some people really do make an interesting model.

Grizz
Kuno-Von-Dodenburg
Visit this Community
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: February 20, 2007
KitMaker: 1,453 posts
Armorama: 1,319 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 10:29 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Well, I'm not about to touch the red oxide base coat as camo controversy, but my question is if there is any photographic evidence (if possible) at all for the single red wheels, barrels and other components. Is there any anecotal evidence in which someone specified that say, his tank had a single red wheel? Why would all wheels be camo painted (as I've seen on some models), save for one red wheel? Why would they say, "Hey, let's not paint this one!"

It may look good, but in most likelihood is wildly inaccurate to portray a vehicle as such. Others may want to believe that such a thing commonly occurred, but in my humble opinion, such things are quite doubtful.



Equally valid is the question: Do we know for sure that these things (single red oxide primer road wheels etc.) didn't occur?

Short answer: No.

And just because there's a lack of photographic evidence doesn't mean that it didn't happen or couldn't have happened. In any case, to address your earlier point about it making a vehicle overly conspicuous, surely a red oxide road wheel wouldn't provide any more of a stand-out aiming point than a bloody great white star or a Balkankreuz on the side of a turret?

In the Germans' desperate rush to get vehicles into action in the latter months of the war, and the fact that cannibalizing two or more damaged vehicles in order to make one servicable one did appear to be commonplace, I'd say that the examples you cite as being questionable are in fact perfectly feasible.

That's the sort of thing I was referring to above about too much obsessing about "accuracy": Often we'll never know for sure one way or the other, so if it's feasible and you fancy going with it - then why not?

- Steve
m4sherman
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 11:17 AM UTC
George,
I was not aware there was any contraversy over the red the Germans used. In my post I used the word "red" because I was refering to the paint sceme in general, not the exact paint used. My point was that a single red wheel would make sense if it is in the pattern apllied. The few color pictures I have seen of late war 3 tone scemes the wheels all looked yellow, or base color.

So, did spare parts come in the proper base color, or were they still in primer? The US NOS parts that I have purchased all came in the proper base color, OD or black etc. Was it the same way in the German supply chain?
404NotFound
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Joined: March 08, 2007
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 11:41 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Well, I'm not about to touch the red oxide base coat as camo controversy, but my question is if there is any photographic evidence (if possible) at all for the single red wheels, barrels and other components. Is there any anecotal evidence in which someone specified that say, his tank had a single red wheel? Why would all wheels be camo painted (as I've seen on some models), save for one red wheel? Why would they say, "Hey, let's not paint this one!"

It may look good, but in most likelihood is wildly inaccurate to portray a vehicle as such. Others may want to believe that such a thing commonly occurred, but in my humble opinion, such things are quite doubtful.



Equally valid is the question: Do we know for sure that these things (single red oxide primer road wheels etc.) didn't occur?

Short answer: No.

And just because there's a lack of photographic evidence doesn't mean that it didn't happen or couldn't have happened. In any case, to address your earlier point about it making a vehicle overly conspicuous, surely a red oxide road wheel wouldn't provide any more of a stand-out aiming point than a bloody great white star or a Balkankreuz on the side of a turret?

In the Germans' desperate rush to get vehicles into action in the latter months of the war, and the fact that cannibalizing two or more damaged vehicles in order to make one servicable one did appear to be commonplace, I'd say that the examples you cite as being questionable are in fact perfectly feasible.

That's the sort of thing I was referring to above about too much obsessing about "accuracy": Often we'll never know for sure one way or the other, so if it's feasible and you fancy going with it - then why not?

- Steve



Well, now we're getting into the realm of attempting to prove a negative, that is as Wikipedia puts it: "X is true because there is no proof that X is false."

Do we know that the Germans never once painted a single wheel lavender? Can we prove that it never happened? No, of course not. Since we don't know that this never happened, we should be able to model it then, correct?

Or perhaps more to the realm of possibility, do we know that the Germans never painted last-days tanks Panzer Grey? Can we prove that it never happened? No.

There are many things we can't prove never happened, but that shouldn't be taken as evidence that they did in fact, occur. Of course, others may have a devotion to such ideas as they are attractive and make for what some consider attractive models and that's fine, it's your model.

But attractive ideas aren't always factual ideas and can't be presented as such merely because one cannot disprove a negative. But hey, to each his own.
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 11:45 AM UTC

Quoted Text

George,
I was not aware there was any contraversy over the red the Germans used. In my post I used the word "red" because I was refering to the paint sceme in general, not the exact paint used. My point was that a single red wheel would make sense if it is in the pattern apllied. The few color pictures I have seen of late war 3 tone scemes the wheels all looked yellow, or base color.

So, did spare parts come in the proper base color, or were they still in primer? The US NOS parts that I have purchased all came in the proper base color, OD or black etc. Was it the same way in the German supply chain?



The German chain of production saw many sub-contractor produce various parts per tank.

To focus on the hulls and turrets, these were made by armour forging plants, Ruhrstahl, Krupp etc. The Tiger turrets were manufactured by Wegman and shipped to their next door neighbour Henschel on dollies.

Now, how where these deliverd? All, i repeat ALL major components were strictly ordered to be finished by the armour forging companies in the base-colour. This changed from Dunkel Gelb to Oliv Grün later in the war.

From mid September to mid December, the order was given to no longer deliver the major components in a basecoat, but only primed Rot Oxid. Now, the critical issue here is, do you go along with Jentz or do you belief he mis-interpreted a German directive.

This is what the whole Rot-Oxid as camouflage debate revolves around:
Jentz states that in this timeframe (mid Sept. to mid Dec '44) tanks were painted leaving much Rot Oxid exposed. As he sees it, the directive called for minimal use of the 3-tone camouflage.

Now the oposition to this idea is based on:
- Rot Oxid is a bright vibrant color, it is in not a color one wants on their military vehicle as it just does not help to conceal. In fact, it makes you stand out.
- Do we have any photographic evidence to support this? We would see FOUR-tone camouflage on vehicles. Since these pictures are not around, it weakens the Rot Oxid as camouflage idea.

What it probably, most likely meant, the directive to use 3-tone camo colors sparingly, is that no longer put Dunkel Gelb all over the vehicle, but only there where it will still be visible. So no longer under the Oliv-Grün and Rot Braun areas. Remember, by this time, Panzers were finished in camo at the factory, using a template.

To get back to the any parts in Rot Oxid question. It simply did not happen, it is a thing that one can not combine with the way tanks were being finished.

Once Henschel, Daimler Benz, MAN, MNH, Kraus Maffei, Demag, Hanomag or any other company did final assembly of all the sub-assemblies, the way they approached this was unchanged up until the moment the last Pz-IV, Tiger-B or Panther-G/F left the production line.

No, there were no single roadwheels NOT covered in either Dunkel Gelb or Oliv Grün.

A very, VERY good example is the Octopus Tiger-B. This tank was from the very last batch of 8 Tiger-Bs that left Henschel. It had the new camouflage scheme, which included handpainted circles. Now, if they even did that, would the workpeople really miss a single roadwheel? A barrel? They didn't.

Factory photo's taken after the Tiger factory was overrun, or for that matter, the Panther factory of MNH or DB, all show that business, right up to the last minute was still going on as usual. On the Panther line, even parts that were easily damaged were still being mounted, like the rod-tube on the Panther's hull-side.

Bottom line, the plants finished their tanks as per the instructions, as did the sub-contractors.

No one rushed their product.
Bratushka
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: May 09, 2008
KitMaker: 1,019 posts
Armorama: 657 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 11:47 AM UTC
on red road wheels i could easily see a situation where parts -road wheels- would be in stock at a factory, but a shortage of paint would have them in primer. it's not far fetched to imagine orders being given to the factory for components on hand to be sent to a front for repair parts regardless of if they were in paint or in primer. again i have read anecdotes of German tanks being in primer below the fender area behind the roadwheels. i have also read of paint applied so thinly that the primer showed through quite prominently.

another post made mention of a flourescent green being used in German 3 color camo. i know exactly what is meant because i have seen a few models and chuckled aloud over the brightness of the green. then i read several compliments on the perfect application of the exactly correct colors pertaining to the build.
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 11:54 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Well, I'm not about to touch the red oxide base coat as camo controversy, but my question is if there is any photographic evidence (if possible) at all for the single red wheels, barrels and other components. Is there any anecotal evidence in which someone specified that say, his tank had a single red wheel? Why would all wheels be camo painted (as I've seen on some models), save for one red wheel? Why would they say, "Hey, let's not paint this one!"

It may look good, but in most likelihood is wildly inaccurate to portray a vehicle as such. Others may want to believe that such a thing commonly occurred, but in my humble opinion, such things are quite doubtful.



Equally valid is the question: Do we know for sure that these things (single red oxide primer road wheels etc.) didn't occur?

Short answer: No.

And just because there's a lack of photographic evidence doesn't mean that it didn't happen or couldn't have happened. In any case, to address your earlier point about it making a vehicle overly conspicuous, surely a red oxide road wheel wouldn't provide any more of a stand-out aiming point than a bloody great white star or a Balkankreuz on the side of a turret?

In the Germans' desperate rush to get vehicles into action in the latter months of the war, and the fact that cannibalizing two or more damaged vehicles in order to make one servicable one did appear to be commonplace, I'd say that the examples you cite as being questionable are in fact perfectly feasible.

That's the sort of thing I was referring to above about too much obsessing about "accuracy": Often we'll never know for sure one way or the other, so if it's feasible and you fancy going with it - then why not?

- Steve



Well, now we're getting into the realm of attempting to prove a negative... Do we know that the Germans never once painted a single wheel lavender? Can we prove that it never happened? No, of course not. Since we don't know that this never happened, we should be able to model it then, correct?

Or perhaps more to the realm of possibility, do we know that the Germans never painted last-days tanks Panzer Grey? Can we prove that it never happened? No.

There are many things we can't prove never happened, but that shouldn't be taken as evidence that they did in fact, occur. Of course, others may have a devotion to such ideas as they are attractive and that's fine, it's your model. But attractive ideas aren't always factual ideas. To each his own.



Exactly prove not, but hypothesize, yes.

Concerning the Panzer Grau, this color was OFFICIALLY designated as permitted to be used on vehicles that were to be painted in 3-tone camouflage. But ONLY if supplies of the 3-tone camouflage colors was low.

Point of fact, that didn't happen. None of the 3-tone camou was ever in such short supply that ANY plant didn't have ONE color not in stock. We do know that Rot Braun was running low, but not to such levels it wasn't available anymore.

So, putting that together, can we say Panzer Grau was not used? With very near certainty, the answer is Yes, it was never used on late war vehicles.

Were any Panzer Grau vehicles around at the end of the war? You bet. How can that be? Simple answer, tanks and other vehicles were being commandeered from every area to be put into combat, including driving schools. These often used "outdated" vehicles to train their drivers, hence, these were on several instances, still in Panzer Grau. Why not in 3-tone? Because re-painting a frontline vehicle took precedence over a Fahrschule-vehicle.

Another source would've been the Luftwaffe. They too, as they fell under another branch of the military, had their own field-applied camouflage using RLM-colors, not RAL. That until they too received their factory finished vehicles.

So anyone fancy doing their SdKfz 7 and 88 in RLM colors?
404NotFound
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Joined: March 08, 2007
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 12:01 PM UTC
Well, that was me that mentioned the fluorescent green on German models. I mean, hey, looks great, but uh...

It's interesting that these trends are receiving these sorts of adamant responses. I mention them merely as modeling trends and perhaps doubtful ones at that, but there does seem to be some reaction that indicates some serious faith and devotion here. I could easily see some of the banter rising to the intensity usually seen on political threads elsewhere to be found on the internet...

Just mentioning trends that look as equally doubtful as blistered paint chipping like the crew went nuts with blowtorches and sledgehammers and black powder burns on barrels. Hey, it's just models, ya know, not something I have an emotional investment in. I take the topic seriously, but I don't take myself seriously. Jes' tryin' to learn here...
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 12:04 PM UTC

Quoted Text

on red road wheels i could easily see a situation where parts -road wheels- would be in stock at a factory, but a shortage of paint would have them in primer. it's not far fetched to imagine orders being given to the factory for components on hand to be sent to a front for repair parts regardless of if they were in paint or in primer. again i have read anecdotes of German tanks being in primer below the fender area behind the roadwheels. i have also read of paint applied so thinly that the primer showed through quite prominently.

another post made mention of a flourescent green being used in German 3 color camo. i know exactly what is meant because i have seen a few models and chuckled aloud over the brightness of the green. then i read several compliments on the perfect application of the exactly correct colors pertaining to the build.



Your anecdotes I have to say are mistaken. Since armourforging companies deliverd the hulls in basecoats, the area behind the roadwheels was also finished in the basecoat.

Also, production plants painted their vehicles quite different from how we approach our models. When a Panther was being sprayed, the didn't tiptoe around the tracks and wheels, they just blasted the spraygun to get the paint in every nood and cranny, under the fenders, behind the wheels, everywhere. They didn't say "oh I can't be bothered with that area aft of the roadwheels." Chances are the tanks would be rejected for service.

As to paint being applied too thin, it could be this is a mix-up with the earlier field applied camouflage. That was delivered to the Werkstatte in paste per tank. They than thinned this to be ready for spraypainting. But then it wasn't sprayed over primer, but over the Dunkel Gelb basecoat.

I think these questions, and I might even use the word Myth for certain ideas, are very good basis for setting up a FAQ about German armour in modeling.
404NotFound
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Joined: March 08, 2007
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 12:29 PM UTC
As far as end-war Panzer Grey on late-war tanks is concerned, I believe that mythos started with Panzer Colors, correct?

That said, I seem to remember a Humbrol flyer when I was 13 (and that was a while ago...) that called out for Panzer Grey for late-war vehicles.
Bratushka
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: May 09, 2008
KitMaker: 1,019 posts
Armorama: 657 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 03:08 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

on red road wheels i could easily see a situation where parts -road wheels- would be in stock at a factory, but a shortage of paint would have them in primer. it's not far fetched to imagine orders being given to the factory for components on hand to be sent to a front for repair parts regardless of if they were in paint or in primer. again i have read anecdotes of German tanks being in primer below the fender area behind the roadwheels. i have also read of paint applied so thinly that the primer showed through quite prominently.

another post made mention of a flourescent green being used in German 3 color camo. i know exactly what is meant because i have seen a few models and chuckled aloud over the brightness of the green. then i read several compliments on the perfect application of the exactly correct colors pertaining to the build.



Your anecdotes I have to say are mistaken. Since armourforging companies deliverd the hulls in basecoats, the area behind the roadwheels was also finished in the basecoat.

Also, production plants painted their vehicles quite different from how we approach our models. When a Panther was being sprayed, the didn't tiptoe around the tracks and wheels, they just blasted the spraygun to get the paint in every nood and cranny, under the fenders, behind the wheels, everywhere. They didn't say "oh I can't be bothered with that area aft of the roadwheels." Chances are the tanks would be rejected for service.

As to paint being applied too thin, it could be this is a mix-up with the earlier field applied camouflage. That was delivered to the Werkstatte in paste per tank. They than thinned this to be ready for spraypainting. But then it wasn't sprayed over primer, but over the Dunkel Gelb basecoat.

I think these questions, and I might even use the word Myth for certain ideas, are very good basis for setting up a FAQ about German armour in modeling.



i can't claim to be an expert on manufacturing processes in WWII Germany. but, as i said in a post on another thread, when it comes to German armor "everything you know is wrong." it seems like it doesn't matter what one reads or what one is told. for every person who says A happened, another will say, oh no, that's a myth, B really happened and A never could! people claim MRI quality insight from old, scratchy B&W photos, anything anybody says from first-hand experience is pooh-poohed away as insignificant, mindless blather. i am beginning to have more respect for those who just tune out all the "experts" and build as they want! historical accuracy is not achievable because no matter what one does, someone will say "No. That's wrong." I would bet even if one went back in time and build a model while looking at the real thing and used factory paint someone would challenge it. as recently as a couple weeks ago the subject comes up in another thread from a paint supplier asking about the blue color used in German armor interiors (marketing input requested or something). i opened another thread asking directly about interior colors and got very little response. in MONTHS of combing thru this forum trying to find information about colors, this is the first I ever heard of blue being used. a few people, myself included, commented on the original post that we all thought interiors were a shade of white. well, lo and behold the blue was correct and i think one person shared that on the thread i started. strange that so few "experts" seemed to know that little bit of information. the thread led me to a link for a book being worked on that has many historically researched details including color analysis from existing vehicles that are untouched in terms of restoration. i am looking forward to it being released and i am thnkful to the individual who provided the link. i'm sure when it is released it will also be faulted with inaccuracies. it's no wonder there hasn't been a fact book about WWII armor! who would subject themselves to such a pounding from their peers? i believed based on my readings that as the war progressed hard and fast rules went out the window. with bombings and slave labor, shortages and the craziness that must have existed. if AFVs were withheld from active combat because they weren't correctly painted or properly fitted with all the appropriate accessories is unbelievable. no military that was a fighting force would do something like that! (Yes sir. The enemy tank batallion is 2 kilometers away and advancing rapidly. No sir, we cannot use our tanks. The paint is improper. I understand. Yes, the retreat will begin immediately.) Japan, when out of time to properly train pilots filled cockpits with men who were trained only enough to get them into the air and find their targets. the Russinas sent more men into combat than there were weapons for expecting they could use the weapons of dead comrades. And the shot anyone who tried to retreat. Germany sent old men and children to face the Russians and the Allies, but i'm supposed to believe they with held armor and parts until it was 100% properly prepared? Desperate time call for desperate tactics.

i gotta say, this is the first thread on this forum that has raised my blood pressure!
beepboop
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: May 23, 2004
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 127 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 03:31 PM UTC
Jesus Christ, who cares?! This is a hobby, not the historical record. Hell, even if it was the historic record, it still wouldn't matter - the exact paint colour or bolt patterns of fighting vehicles are totally unimportant to the course of history. They effects nothing. It wouldn't have made the blindest bit of difference to the course of history what shade Olive Drab was, or whether or not Panzers had chipped paint when they were blown up.

Rivet-counting drives me nuts because it's nothing more than a bunch of anal retentives trying to put down other people and take the fun out of what they're doing. I couldn't care less if people want to paint panzers bright pink - I might not personally want to copy that, but I sure as hell wouldn't criticise them for daring to portray something artistically rather than accurately. Modelling is about turning lumps of plastic into representations of warmachines for recreation. It's not some deadly-serious professional occupation upon which our very lives depend.

To me it's this simple - you build a model, paint it, and if you're happy with the outcome then mission accomplished.
Removed by original poster on 10/23/08 - 09:58:05 (GMT).
cach7
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: October 13, 2002
KitMaker: 444 posts
Armorama: 439 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 03:42 PM UTC
You guys need to get a hobby!
Removed by original poster on 10/23/08 - 09:58:53 (GMT).
cach7
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: October 13, 2002
KitMaker: 444 posts
Armorama: 439 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 03:51 PM UTC
It almost looks dark green with a brown camo pattern.
c5flies
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 03:51 PM UTC

Quoted Text

You guys need to get a hobby!



Oh jeez, Mike, I just spewed coffee all over my keyboard
Removed by original poster on 10/23/08 - 09:59:18 (GMT).
m4sherman
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 03:56 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Jesus Christ, who cares?! This is a hobby, not the historical record. Hell, even if it was the historic record, it still wouldn't matter - the exact paint colour or bolt patterns of fighting vehicles are totally unimportant to the course of history. They effects nothing. It wouldn't have made the blindest bit of difference to the course of history what shade Olive Drab was, or whether or not Panzers had chipped paint when they were blown up.

Rivet-counting drives me nuts because it's nothing more than a bunch of anal retentives trying to put down other people and take the fun out of what they're doing. I couldn't care less if people want to paint panzers bright pink - I might not personally want to copy that, but I sure as hell wouldn't criticise them for daring to portray something artistically rather than accurately. Modelling is about turning lumps of plastic into representations of warmachines for recreation. It's not some deadly-serious professional occupation upon which our very lives depend.

To me it's this simple - you build a model, paint it, and if you're happy with the outcome then mission accomplished.



I fully agree with your last statement. While I am not a rivet counter, I do try to build models as accurately as possible given the base model, and I do care up to a point. As I stated before, if I do not like the technique, I do not use it, which is good advice. I am very gratefull this is not the historical record, Hollyweird has ruined that enought!

I think that the originator of this discussion was simply trying to feel out the reason for a specific painting technique that he might not agree with. We have diverged from that just a bit.

Herbert, re the spares question, thanks for the answer.
Removed by original poster on 10/23/08 - 10:16:05 (GMT).
m4sherman
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 04:16 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

It almost looks dark green with a brown camo pattern.

thats what i thought at first but opted for grey , maybe my tired old eyes aint up to it anymore



The first pic shows a battle weary Panther D, so an area repainted red area would happen. Your second one is strange for a couple reasons. The step like thing on the turret, and that huge cross on the turret sides. Could this be one of those French post war Panthers that I heard were used in some movies?
404NotFound
Visit this Community
Tennessee, United States
Joined: March 08, 2007
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 322 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 05:18 PM UTC
Wow, a lot of emotional reaction in this thread from people that say others are taking things far too seriously... As I like to say, there's a lesson here somewhere, I just know it...

But seriously, if I may, is this or is this not a thread about modeling trends? Are there certain topics within this genre that must not be broached? If so, who gets to decide this? Are we missing something here?

Anyway, c'mon folks, relax. Paint your barrels red if that's what you hafta do. You don't have to explain yourselves. It's OK. Really.
Kuno-Von-Dodenburg
Visit this Community
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: February 20, 2007
KitMaker: 1,453 posts
Armorama: 1,319 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 07:56 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Well, now we're getting into the realm of attempting to prove a negative, that is as Wikipedia puts it: "X is true because there is no proof that X is false."

Do we know that the Germans never once painted a single wheel lavender? Can we prove that it never happened? No, of course not. Since we don't know that this never happened, we should be able to model it then, correct? ... There are many things we can't prove never happened, but that shouldn't be taken as evidence that they did in fact, occur.



Oh come on, friend.

I wasn't talking about painting wheels lavender, or Tigers sky-blue pink or anything like that - but I think you know that really .

My point was simply this: That we know the broad parameters within which paint colours & schemes were applied, the periods when they were applied and the various colours and combinations of same that were used.

Which means that (even in the absence of definitive photographic evidence), various permutations are indeed possible or feasible within said boundaries - and thus there's some scope for artistic license because we can't say for sure one way or the other (whereas we know that, say, lavender was in all likelihood never used, and we can also say with almost 100% certainty that there were no tanks painted bright scarlet with royal blue polka-dots).


Quoted Text

But attractive ideas aren't always factual ideas and can't be presented as such merely because one cannot disprove a negative. But hey, to each his own.



That statement assumes that the overriding motivation of all modellers is indeed to build and present their work as "factual".


Quoted Text

Jesus Christ, who cares?! This is a hobby, not the historical record. Hell, even if it was the historic record, it still wouldn't matter - the exact paint colour or bolt patterns of fighting vehicles are totally unimportant to the course of history. They effects nothing. It wouldn't have made the blindest bit of difference to the course of history what shade Olive Drab was, or whether or not Panzers had chipped paint when they were blown up.

Rivet-counting drives me nuts because it's nothing more than a bunch of anal retentives trying to put down other people and take the fun out of what they're doing. I couldn't care less if people want to paint panzers bright pink - I might not personally want to copy that, but I sure as hell wouldn't criticise them for daring to portray something artistically rather than accurately. Modelling is about turning lumps of plastic into representations of warmachines for recreation. It's not some deadly-serious professional occupation upon which our very lives depend.

To me it's this simple - you build a model, paint it, and if you're happy with the outcome then mission accomplished.



Have to concur, Ian.

I try my best to get my builds as accurate as possible (within the limits of my skills, patience and the time available to me for modelling) - but not to the extent of researching every minute detail and spending hour upon hour upon hour (of valuabe modelling time!!) scouring through endless references and fretting over whether some hatch might be a thou too far forward, or worrying that some fender might be a quarter of a mm too thick in scale.

If other guys get their enjoyment from going into such painstaking detail, then that's all well and good - but I do sometimes detect a definite undercurrent of snobbery (disdain, even) among some "accurists" and rivet-counters that's directed against guys who build more just for fun and relaxation.

- Steve
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 01:56 AM UTC

Quoted Text

if this pic is an original color print take a look at the bin on the rear of this panther it seems to be in red primer !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Uhm... that is thrown up mud...
H_Ackermans
Visit this Community
Gelderland, Netherlands
Joined: July 11, 2006
KitMaker: 2,229 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 02:05 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Jesus Christ, who cares?! This is a hobby, not the historical record. Hell, even if it was the historic record, it still wouldn't matter - the exact paint colour or bolt patterns of fighting vehicles are totally unimportant to the course of history. They effects nothing. It wouldn't have made the blindest bit of difference to the course of history what shade Olive Drab was, or whether or not Panzers had chipped paint when they were blown up.

Rivet-counting drives me nuts because it's nothing more than a bunch of anal retentives trying to put down other people and take the fun out of what they're doing. I couldn't care less if people want to paint panzers bright pink - I might not personally want to copy that, but I sure as hell wouldn't criticise them for daring to portray something artistically rather than accurately. Modelling is about turning lumps of plastic into representations of warmachines for recreation. It's not some deadly-serious professional occupation upon which our very lives depend.

To me it's this simple - you build a model, paint it, and if you're happy with the outcome then mission accomplished.



Have to concur, Ian.

I try my best to get my builds as accurate as possible (within the limits of my skills, patience and the time available to me for modelling) - but not to the extent of researching every minute detail and spending hour upon hour upon hour (of valuabe modelling time!!) scouring through endless references and fretting over whether some hatch might be a thou too far forward, or worrying that some fender might be a quarter of a mm too thick in scale.

If other guys get their enjoyment from going into such painstaking detail, then that's all well and good - but I do sometimes detect a definite undercurrent of snobbery (disdain, even) among some "accurists" and rivet-counters that's directed against guys who build more just for fun and relaxation.

- Steve



Might I just counter that by saying the opposite happens just as much. Just look at what Ian says about people like me who DO care about knowing everything about a specific vehicle.

We are anal-retentive and only live to put others down.

I call foul un such statements, really. That is just below the belt kind of bantering.

I just happen to be really, really very much interested in the production history of the Tiger and the Panther.

I often tend to think, to those who put down people who really put a lot of effort into getting thing accurate, why do you even bother coming over here? Why not just stick to Airfix kits, paint your tank in gold with silver lining but just don't persecute anyone who wants to get it right.