135
StuG.III Ausf.G Late Production Dec.1944

  • move
Time to call in the dogs and put out the fire
To sum up, Dragon's StuG III Ausf.G Late Production Dec.1944 (6593) is a bit of a mixed bag. There are some wonderful details, generally excellent molding and execution, but more than a few let downs too. I got the feeling that this was a rushed job; the new parts had some fit issues or errors that should not be present in this day from a mainstream producer. The abundant (and generally excellent) detail that Dragon provides results in a sometimes overly complicated build with potential for awkward gaps. Some parts are way over scale and/or clunky, while others are suitably to scale and petite. The instructions could always be improved, in particular, colour call outs for the interior would be nice. Molding was generally good to excellent, no flash, but a few minor mold seams to scrape. The switch to DS tracks is, in my opinion, a big minus. At the very least, Dragon should provide both, either as two different kit boxings or both included in one, and allow the modeler to decide which to use. They might as well not bother including the tow cable. Save it for hanging pictures on a wall.

Dragon's approach to production could be better thought out, regarding the placement of the molding nubs; filling in the odd ejector pin mark would not be a horrible option in some circumstances. The reuse of older sprues, while logical, creates more than a few issues as well, but will allow for backdating should you wish, and will provide a good amount of fodder for the spares box. I wouldn't recommend this kit to a novice due to the advanced nature of some assemblies and the potential fit issues as outlined above. For an advanced modeler, this kit will not pose any problems if you pay attention and use your experience to advantage in identifying problem areas. Other let downs are the lack of spare tracks (some luggage would also be nice), schurzen and a very limited choice of marking options. Recommended with reservations. My thanks to Dragon via Armorama, and to Staff Jim for the review kit.

Kimmo
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move

About the Author

About Kimmo Happonen (Thudius)
FROM: UUSIMAA, FINLAND

I got my first kit when I was about 7 or 8 and was immediately hooked. Magazines such as Fine Scale Modeler helped to push me to go beyond what kits had to offer before photo etch and resin were commonplace. I took a break of about 8 years and now I'm back at it making up for lost time. When I'm not...


Comments

Do you sometimes get the impression that Dragon has become so overconfident in their 3D modelling and prototyping that they actually don't bother sitting a guy down at a table with a tube of glue to test assemble one of these before they run the production and ship? I am seriously beginning to think so.
SEP 13, 2013 - 06:27 PM
Does a bear wear funny hats at birthday parties? But in all seriousness, I am amazed, and not in a pleasant way, at the number of parts that have fit issues and it's not just with this kit either. The worst seem to be the simplest too. For instance, a simple drop in part will have a hole that needs filler. You would think that the CAD driver would check measurements against each other, but maybe that's just me. In contrast, I recently fiddled with a Griffon early smoke candle rack and the fit was impossibly bang on for pieces that small, taking into consideration that etch has a bit of give and take with the process used. While the issues can be overcome, they are issues that should not be present for a major player like Dragon. I can forgive cottage industry manufacturers with engineering and fit, but not so easily with a major manufacturer. Even the ancient Tamiya Leopard 1A4 I had started a while back fit well. Kimmo
SEP 13, 2013 - 11:17 PM
nice review, I read for some place the only wrong in this kit is because is dont final production for some part in the ass of this tank. But is really nice kit (except for the tracks, I prefer the Tamiya tracks or old Dragon in plastic).
SEP 14, 2013 - 06:46 AM
Thanks. As I said in the review, I'm not a Stug expert so I can't say too much about what is and isn't correct. Fortunately, there are a lot of unused parts and I think one could practically make any variant of the G/40. Kimmo
SEP 15, 2013 - 02:12 AM
Very Nice review. I also bought this kit. I've been looking through your masterpiece and how you made it. But I think there might be a bit of an issue...
JAN 06, 2015 - 01:09 PM
Only one? Kimmo
JAN 06, 2015 - 01:39 PM
This was my first Dragon kit in 1/35. I think I'll stick with Tamiya 1/35...
JAN 08, 2015 - 08:58 AM
This was actually my first modern Dragon as well, there is definitely an adjustment to be made going from Tamiya to Dragon, or any of the other new manufacturers these days. Lots of detail, lots of potential to get frustrated. Patience is the key. Kimmo
JAN 08, 2015 - 01:57 PM
Uh, no, thanks. Tamiya kits are for the most part too simplified. Kimmo, that's a very extensive review and a credit to the site. I like your yellow pre-shading under the Dunkelgelb.
JAN 09, 2015 - 02:40 AM
Thanks Bill. When I was writing it up, I thought it was far too lengthy but I wasn't really sure where to start trimming text so just left it as is. I was rather pleased with the end result of the dunkelgelb, and going over the pics again, I can't help but notice those tracks really don't do the kit justice. Kimmo
JAN 09, 2015 - 06:44 PM